Various Clarifications
1. Why do we have two publicly funded school systems?
A. The courts did this one to us, not the politicians. All the politicians did was implement the decision of the courts. This happened during the Liberal government's tenure.
2. Why were the Tories headed for a deficit in 2003, despite their "balance the books policies"?
A. A great deal of government spending is determined through labour arbitration decisions to determine salaries. This is the case for the hospital sector, fire, judges and crown attorneys, police, ambulance, and, in many cases the education sector (where striking teachers are legislated back to work). Until governments can truly control public service wage costs, no government can avoid miscalculation of its budget. Of course, that's a different thing than intentionally incurring debt by overspending.
3. Can you make peace with teachers?
A. No. Even Bob Rae admitted that. Trade unionism does not work when there is no competition. In our education system, no teacher needs to worry that students will start attending some other school (and, therefore, the teacher will lose her job) if labour disputes are unreasonable and disruptive. It is a system where there are no negative consequences for unreasonable behaviour. How can you make peace within a system like that?
4. The price of hydro.
Before privatization, Ontarians (including corporations) paid a dramatically subsidized price for Hydro. This subsidy accumulated as enormous debt for Hydro. The cost of carrying that debt threatened the ability of Ontario Hydro to operate and produce power. Privatization was seen as a way to divide this debt between more producers and offload debt (or at least the accumulation of debt) from the government. This subsidization went on for so long that the sudden shift to market prices reflecting the true cost of electrical production shocked and infuriated the public. The PCs compromised their principles and got back into the game of rate freezes, and thererfore rate regulation. However, everyone should understand that these measures will not reduce the cost of producing electricity. If you don't pay for it in your hydro bill, you will pay for it in your taxes. If you pay for it in your hydro bill, you'll pay according to your use (including corporations, remember). If you pay in your taxes, middle class income earners will subsidize the energy consumption of the rich, the poor, and corporations. I'd rather not subsidize other people.
Unfortunately, so many issues get argued without acknowledging the fundamental facts which underpin both sides of the argument.