Israeli women brutally raped
- Thread starter stinkynuts
- Start date
- Status
Mounting evidence
The evidence of sexual violence presented during the session at the UN was ample and overwhelming and came from different sources.
While Greyman spoke about his experience from the search and rescue operations, Yael Richert, a superintendent with the Israel Police, shared information gathered during the investigation so far.
She said survivors of the terror attack told investigators they witnessed Hamas terrorists perpetrating sexual violence against the victims. She quoted testimonies of several individuals all of whom either directly witnessed sexual violence or saw clear evidence of it.
“There were girls with broken pelvis due to repetitive rapes, their legs were split wide apart in a split,” Richert quoted one survivor of the Nova music festival massacre as saying.
We heard girls that were pulled out from the shelters. Girls that shouted. They raped girls. Burnt them just after that. All the bodies outside were burnt
Yael Richert, superintendent, Israel Police
“We heard girls that were pulled out from the shelters. Girls that shouted. They raped girls. Burnt them just after that. All the bodies outside were burnt,” Richert said, reading from another testimony.
Shari Mendes, an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reservist who looked after the bodies of female soldiers killed during the attack, also described the evidence she saw, saying many of the bodies arrived in “bloody shredded rags or just an underwear and their underwear was often very bloody.”
Photographs and videos from the scenes back Mendes’ accounts. A video geolocated by CNN to a neighborhood in Gaza, showed a young, barefoot woman pulled from the trunk of a Jeep by a gunman and then forced into the backseat of the car. Her trousers were soaked with what appeared to be blood.
“Our team commander saw several female soldiers who were shot in their crotch, intimate parts, vagina, or shot in the breast. There seem to be a systematic genital mutilation of a group of victims,” she added.
The evidence of sexual violence presented during the session at the UN was ample and overwhelming and came from different sources.
While Greyman spoke about his experience from the search and rescue operations, Yael Richert, a superintendent with the Israel Police, shared information gathered during the investigation so far.
She said survivors of the terror attack told investigators they witnessed Hamas terrorists perpetrating sexual violence against the victims. She quoted testimonies of several individuals all of whom either directly witnessed sexual violence or saw clear evidence of it.
“There were girls with broken pelvis due to repetitive rapes, their legs were split wide apart in a split,” Richert quoted one survivor of the Nova music festival massacre as saying.
We heard girls that were pulled out from the shelters. Girls that shouted. They raped girls. Burnt them just after that. All the bodies outside were burnt
Yael Richert, superintendent, Israel Police
“We heard girls that were pulled out from the shelters. Girls that shouted. They raped girls. Burnt them just after that. All the bodies outside were burnt,” Richert said, reading from another testimony.
Shari Mendes, an Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reservist who looked after the bodies of female soldiers killed during the attack, also described the evidence she saw, saying many of the bodies arrived in “bloody shredded rags or just an underwear and their underwear was often very bloody.”
Photographs and videos from the scenes back Mendes’ accounts. A video geolocated by CNN to a neighborhood in Gaza, showed a young, barefoot woman pulled from the trunk of a Jeep by a gunman and then forced into the backseat of the car. Her trousers were soaked with what appeared to be blood.
“Our team commander saw several female soldiers who were shot in their crotch, intimate parts, vagina, or shot in the breast. There seem to be a systematic genital mutilation of a group of victims,” she added.
Greyman described finding a woman who was shot in the back of her head, lying on her bed, naked from her waist down. A live grenade was planted in her hand.
And then there was the body with the nails.
“I was called into a house, I was told there are few bodies over there. I saw in front of my eyes a woman, laying (down). She was naked and she had nails …,” Greyman managed to say before pausing for a long time, struggling to get the words out.
“She had nails and different objects in her female organs. Her body was brutalized in a way that we could not identify her,” he added, the trauma clearly visible on his face.
And then there was the body with the nails.
“I was called into a house, I was told there are few bodies over there. I saw in front of my eyes a woman, laying (down). She was naked and she had nails …,” Greyman managed to say before pausing for a long time, struggling to get the words out.
“She had nails and different objects in her female organs. Her body was brutalized in a way that we could not identify her,” he added, the trauma clearly visible on his face.
I still wonder if any of these rape/murder/immolation victims were featured in sexy pics of IDF babes previously posted on TERB?
I'm waiting for frank to cite "75 years of occupation", or "is this worse than the genocide Israel is perpetrating against 2 million Gazans".
He'll have no problem justifying it. "I condemn all violence but....."
Oops. I was a few seconds too slow typing. One of the other KKK brothers beat him to it. But he used the exact justification I predicted.
Disgusting.
Its just the latest nonsense from the IDF, its not at all believable if you look closely, but you won't.
Same as the Hamas headquarters under Al Shifa, its propaganda meant to dehumanize Palestinians to justify genocide.
Works really well on angry racists who would never doubt the IDF.
The first of these stories was the 40 beheaded babies, and that took a month for Haaretz to investigate and debunk.
The photo of the woman they said was raped was found to be an old photo of a Kurdish woman.
There are direct testimonies of survivors of the rave who say Hamas treated them well and it was the IDF that came in with Apaches and tanks and killed most of the Israelis.
And the 'evidence' comes from the first responder group ZAKA, which is founded by a serial rapist.
In essence, here is a good summary:
After the beheaded babies nonsense fell apart now they are coming up with this other bullshit. Somehow women being raped is supposed to mitigate deliberately slaughtering babies and children. somehow doing it with MK 82 bombs dropped from F-16s is more acceptable?
Seems there was some evidence, though:
.
.
Your classic strategy.
When the facts are against you, claim they are lies, throw in some "genocides", an "ethnic cleansing" here or there, claim racism, intentionally misinterpret what someone else says and then throw in a bunch of phony propaganda clips and you think you've won the debate. You are so very predictable.
I'm glad to see that you are being as neutral, objective and non-biased as ever. Which means you were NEVER any of those. Your attempt at a charade lasted a day or two after after Oct. 7. Now it's just full on rabid....
An excerpt from your link:Seems there was some evidence, though:
.
During the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas on Israeli towns, Israeli women and girls were reportedly raped, assaulted and mutilated by Hamas militants.[1][2] Hamas was accused of committing acts of gender-based violence, war crimes and crimes against humanity in keeping with the recognition of The International Criminal Court (ICC) that sexual violence is a war crime and a crime against humanity.[3][4][5][6]
Our KKK (franK, Kautilya and Klatuu)continue to deny it.
Yes!!!
MAX BLUMENTHAL!!!!!!
Frankie, you can't admit that your precious HAMAS did anything wrong, can you?
Looks like I need to repost this:
copied and pasted from the internet, and directed at KKK and their ilk...
But what about the people who can never admit they’ve misstepped, no matter the circumstance? What makes them incapable of apologizing even when they’re obviously in the wrong? For these people, admitting wrongdoing and offering an apology is too psychologically threatening. Offering an apology implies that they’ve harmed another person in some way, which can elicit feelings of shame.
People who cannot apologize often have such deep feelings of low self-worth that their fragile egos cannot absorb the blow of admitting they were wrong. So their defense mechanisms kick in — at times, unconsciously — and they may externalize any blame and even dispute basic facts to ward off the threat of having to lower themselves by offering an apology. When they double down on their wrongness by blaming circumstances, denying the facts, or attacking the other person or people involved, non-apologizers can make themselves feel empowered rather than diminished.
Unfortunately, many of us mistakenly interpret these people’s fragility-driven defensiveness as a sign of psychological strength. That’s because outwardly they appear to be tough individuals who refuse to back down. But they don’t do this because they’re strong — it’s because they’re weak.
Psychologically speaking, admitting that we’re wrong is emotionally uncomfortable and painful to our sense of self. In order to take responsibility and apologize, our self-esteem needs to be strong enough for us to absorb that discomfort. Indeed, if our self-esteem is higher and stable, we can tolerate the temporary ding that such an admission involves — without the walls around our ego crumbling.
But if our self-esteem is seemingly high but actually fragile, that ding can pierce through our defensive walls and score a direct hit to our ego. Indeed, as a rule of psychological thumb, the more rigid one’s defense mechanisms are, the more fragile the ego they’re protecting.
The mistake we often make when faced with someone who’s habitually incapable of apologizing is to become irate (for good reason, of course) and try to win our argument with them (because we’re right!). But the sad and frustrating reality is we can never win. Even if we demonstrated that they were wrong in stark, inarguable facts, they will either deny those inarguable facts or pivot to a personal attack by saying something like “Why do you always make things difficult and unpleasant?!?”.
In these situations, the best we can do is to make our points as calmly and as convincingly as we can and then disengage from the argument when it becomes unproductive — like when they dispute the facts, come up with ridiculous excuses or pivot to petty remarks."
Gee, why do you think Hamas wouldn't extend the ceasefire by simply releasing more female hostages.
A little afraid of the sexual abuse truth coming out from the mouths of the hostage victims, perhaps?
A little afraid of the sexual abuse truth coming out from the mouths of the hostage victims, perhaps?
Do they really need ceasefire though? They cannot win this militarily. All they have is whining to incite western useful idiots which is going pretty well right now. If anything, continuation of the military actions is quite helping. More civilian casualties more whining. Win win.
Do I believe that Hamas will rape women (of any religion)?
Oh, I absolutely do.....
Oh, I absolutely do.....
Holy fuck you guys are disgusting. Just keep showing how little humanitarianism means when you can use an excuse to generate hatred.
- Status
