Israeli occupation to blame for fatal Palestinian attack on cafe - Tel Aviv mayor

[basketcase]

Hamas is stuck in one of the most densely populated areas on the planet, under constant surveillance and intrusion by Israelis and are living in what is recognized as 'the world's largest open air prison'.

Where did you think they would go?

Can't go close to the borders, where 25% of Gaza's arable land is a 'shoot to kill' zone, can they?

By the way, the only one defending terrorism here is you, where you are still defending bombing schools and hospitals filled with what you call 'cockroaches'.

Plenty of open land for Hamas to operate in.
https://www.google.ca/maps/@31.4159835,34.4581697,42987m/data=!3m1!1e3


And your whole line of argument is a joke. You are saying that Hamas can't launch terror attacks from open land because if they do Israel will stop them. Sure sounds like a win-win to me. The Palestinians get rid of the massively corrupt terrorists who are preventing peace from occurring and the Israelis aren't subject to terror attacks.

If they launched their terror attacks from open land they would only be committing crimes against humanity once with Israelis as the victims. Since they hide in Gaza's population centers they also commit crimes against humanity with Palestinians being the victims.

But you just want to make excuses for Hamas terror instead of even hinting at criticism.

 

[exceed]

Yes, you tried to excuse Messi by pretending he was trolling. What I want to know is in what world is a guy "trolling" when during an irrationally anti-Israel tirade he praises Hitler?

Can you explain how you thought that was a troll comment and what point/humour was supposed to be projected other than racial hatred.

How is "We need Hitler, bring him back from the dead." and "Powerful words. But +1" trolling?

Bullshit I never tried excusing him for anything, what was being said was He's obviously trolling to incite a feedback. And if you get angry with him it will only suit his purpose.

you and Fuji continued to frame me after 5 years, it takes a special kind of hatred for you to do that. Both of you are quite unique human beings

 

[Frankfooter]

Plenty of open land for Hamas to operate in.
https://www.google.ca/maps/@31.4159835,34.4581697,42987m/data=!3m1!1e3

Would you like to pinpoint where on the map you think they should fire rockets from?
Perhaps you can give them a schedule to work from, while you're at it?


According to the real reports they don't use human shields at all, that's just more of your nonsense.
Of course, those same reports say that only Israel uses human shields.

Are you against human shields by both sides?
Don't you think both sides should be charged for all war crimes, like using human shields?

And of course, Israel kills way, way more civilians then Hamas.
But you don't care about those 'cockroaches' as you call them, do you?

 

[basketcase]

Would you like to pinpoint where on the map you think they should fire rockets from?...

That's exactly the fucking point. They shouldn't be firing rockets.



And yes, plenty of farmland in that sat image if Hamas still wanted to commit terror but protect Gaza's people.

 

[basketcase]

....
But you don't care about those 'cockroaches' as you call them, do you?

Keep on being a dishonest piece of shit.

 

[Frankfooter]

That's exactly the fucking point. They shouldn't be firing rockets.

I agree.

Of course they also shouldn't be living under foreign military occupation for half a century.
As the UN says, its all because of the occupation.

The 2015 report found the Israeli occupation "to be the main trigger of humanitarian needs among Palestinians in the occupied territory."

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/06/concerned-israel-excessive-force-160613052459420.html

 

[Frankfooter]

Keep on being a dishonest piece of shit.

As you clearly stated, you call civilians killed by Israel 'cockroaches'.

And judging by your claim of 2000 civilians, it is quite clear that you consider Palestinian armed combatants to be civilians but you have stated that Israeli civilians are valid targets.

And as long as Hamas chooses to attack civilians for a racist, genocidal goal they should be considered cockroaches.

I was considering giving you a pass on this one, but since you keep attacking others on this board for posts they apologized for, I don't see the need.

 

[basketcase]

I agree.

Of course they also shouldn't be living under foreign military occupation for half a century.
As the UN says, its all because of the occupation.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/06/concerned-israel-excessive-force-160613052459420.html

And your usual justification of terror.

Hamas routinely and proudly launches terror attacks, intent on murdering any Jewish civilian they can find and instead of criticizing them all you do is come up with disgusting justifications.

 

[Frankfooter]

And your usual justification of terror.

This was a statement from the UN.
So now you don't think the occupation is responsible for all the violence and now you blame the UN?

You are on a roll.

 

[fuji]

Now that's another bogus lie you made up I've tried multiple times typing in the keys words on Google and it does not bring up the thread you posted on your link. In any event you are exposed on what you are, a liar that consistently harasses members here that made out of context foolish statements in the past.

No reasonable person would spend a considerable amount of time to go through every single post in the last 5 years to prove what was a stupid statement. You do have an agenda and you are paid, otherwise it wouldn't make no sense.

You need better Google skills then.

site:terb.cc exceed hate

First result for me.

 

[basketcase]

This was a statement from the UN.
So now you don't think the occupation is responsible for all the violence and now you blame the UN?

You are on a roll.

So you don't even have the decency to stand behind your own claims and there is absolutely no excuse for Hamas launching terror attacks. Why are you so reluctant to criticize Hamas for sending suicide bombers and gunmen to shoot up restaurants?

And blaming the 'occupation' for Palestinian terrorism is like blaming Donald Trump for racism. Palestinian terror was happening before 1967 and before 1948.

 

[Frankfooter]

So you don't even have the decency to stand behind your own claims

The UN stated that the occupation is the source of all the troubles there.
I stand by that statement.

While you are now accusing the UN of 'justifying terrorism' and claiming that is the issue, not the half century illegal, military occupation.

 

[fuji]

The UN stated that the occupation is the source of all the troubles there.
I stand by that statement.

While you are now accusing the UN of 'justifying terrorism' and claiming that is the issue, not the half century illegal, military occupation.

The occupation is not the source, Palestinian terror attacks predate it. On the contrary, it's Palestinian terrorism that has prevented the occupation from ending.

 

[nottyboi]

The occupation is not the source, Palestinian terror attacks predate it. On the contrary, it's Palestinian terrorism that has prevented the occupation from ending.

Well of course you are right, that is why elements in Israel seek to perpetuate terrorism and Hamas. You are SLOWLY starting to understand ...soooo slowwllllly.

 

[fuji]

Well of course you are right, that is why elements in Israel seek to perpetuate terrorism and Hamas. You are SLOWLY starting to understand ...soooo slowwllllly.

No one in Israel seeks to perpetuate Hamas, kook.

 

[Frankfooter]

CBC has an interesting article on anti-semitism today.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/social-activism-anti-semitism-bocott-divestment-sanctions-1.3633252

They note that the tactics used here and by the Israeli government to conflate criticism of Israeli government policy with criticisms of Jews has lead to an increase in anti-semitism across the globe.

At the core of all this, of course, is the conflation of all Jews with the policies of Israel, a classic form of anti-Semitism.

But — speaking of indifference to irony — that conflation is nowadays driven at least partly by the government of Israel itself.

The Palestinians, having been told for decades to embrace non-violent resistance, finally came up with the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement.

It has been embraced by progressive groups worldwide, and Israel and its supporters have counterattacked.

The Israeli foreign ministry has urged Western governments to treat BDS, which is essentially a decision about how not to spend your money, as anti-Semitic, criminal hate speech.

It has had some success with that approach: in France, protesters who urged supermarket customers not to buy Israeli products were convicted of inciting hatred.

Several U.S. states, most recently New York, have passed anti-BDS laws and regulations. As Gov. Andrew Cuomo tweeted last week: "It's very simple: If you boycott against Israel, New York will boycott you."
...

The conflation of all supporters of BDS with Jew-hating is as scattershot and sweeping as the conflation of all Jews with Israel.

It ignores the inconvenient truth that some pro-Israeli Jews are embarrassed by that country's current government, as well as the fact that some of the strongest proponents of BDS are Jewish.

But it is all of a piece with the scorched-earth nature of modern political discourse.

There is us, and them, and no-man's land in between. Detail and nuance and history are just annoyances, to be marched past, or over.

Arguments on whether Israel is apartheid, for instance, are not 'anti-semitic', they are legit discussions about illegal actions by a government.

 

[fuji]

CBC has an interesting article on anti-semitism today.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/social-activism-anti-semitism-bocott-divestment-sanctions-1.3633252

They note that the tactics used here and by the Israeli government to conflate criticism of Israeli government policy with criticisms of Jews has lead to an increase in anti-semitism across the globe.



Arguments on whether Israel is apartheid, for instance, are not 'anti-semitic', they are legit discussions about illegal actions by a government.

Yes, it's antisemitic. It's a lie you tell in order to incite hatred. It's inherently antisemitic, as are you.

 

[basketcase]

CBC has an interesting article on anti-semitism today.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/social-activism-anti-semitism-bocott-divestment-sanctions-1.3633252

They note that the tactics used here and by the Israeli government to conflate criticism of Israeli government policy with criticisms of Jews has lead to an increase in anti-semitism across the globe.

...t.

The usual shit that the Jews are to blame for anti-semitism.

BTW. Our government and numerous other western governments have condemned the Israeli Apartheid and BDS movements as being hate movements.

 

[Frankfooter]

The usual shit that the Jews are to blame for anti-semitism.

See, there you go proving the article correct.
You conflated discussion on Israeli government's apartheid policy with Jews.
We are talking government policy, we know that there are numerous Jews here and there that disagree with Israeli policy, including its apartheid policy.

You just proved the article correct.

 

[fuji]

See, there you go proving the article correct.
You conflated discussion on Israeli government's apartheid policy with Jews.
We are talking government policy, we know that there are numerous Jews here and there that disagree with Israeli policy, including its apartheid policy.

You just proved the article correct.

Israel doesn't have any apartheid policies liar. Your constant hate lies to demonize Israel disgust people . That's why Canada condemned you and the other antisemites in BDS.