I have had Blizzaks and Michelins and now have the Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires. I would rank them this way:
1. Nokian Hakkapeliitta - For me a good tradeoff between wear and traction. Perhaps a little less steering precision than the Blizzaks.
2. Blizzak - Less straight line wander at speed. Still good traction on hills. Tight handling for a winter tire.
3. Michelin - Good for ice. Maybe you pay for that stickiness on the wear side.
I did not get quite as much wear out of the Michelins. All three are far better than all-weather tires for winter driving. There is nothing wrong with the Michelins if you get a great price. The Hakkapeliittas make a big 4 wheel drive sedan go like a tank.The Blizzaks and Michelins let me drive a rear wheel drive sports car in winter conditions without killing myself.
I’ve never had a set of Blizzaks but I agree with the rest of this. Just brought the Hakk’s this year and put them on an AWD sedan and holy shit!!!!! My street was a sheet of ice on Wednesday and drove down the street, around a slow curve and stopped like it was dry, couldn’t believe the grip I had. I find the Hakk’s a little louder and not as sharp as the last two sets of Michelin X-Ice but the tread is way more aggressive so I expected that. I usually get 60-70k out of the Michelin’s so I’m interested to see how these stack up.

