ISIS planning ‘nuclear tsunami’

[eznutz]

Nuclear annihilation across the globe. This is what a German reporter who successfully embedded with the Islamic State says the terror group is planning. Jurgen Todenhofer released his findings in a book titled “Inside IS - Ten Days in the Islamic State,” reports the UK’s Daily Express.

“The terrorists plan on killing several hundred million people. The west is drastically underestimating the power of ISIS. ISIS intends to get its hands on nuclear weapons,” says Todenhofer, calling the group a “nuclear tsunami preparing the largest religious cleansing in history.”

“They now control land greater in size than the United Kingdom and are supported by an almost ecstatic enthusiasm the like of which I’ve never encountered before in a war zone. Every day hundreds of willing fighters from all over the world come. They are the most brutal and most dangerous enemy I have ever seen in my life. I don’t see anyone who has a real chance to stop them. Only Arabs can stop IS. I came back very pessimistic.”

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/28/l-todd-wood-isis-planning-nuclear-tsunami/

 

[trtinajax]

Wow! Would the good buddies of Justin and Thomas really do that to the world. Maybe Justin should use his powers of speech and ask them to please not do that.

Of course that may help to explain the sudden emptying of the middle east countries outside of Syria.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Nuke Isis before they nuke us would seem like an easy answer, but it isn't. Hopefully, ISIS won't cause the next WW.

 

[nottyboi]

Nuke Isis before they nuke us would seem like an easy answer, but it isn't. Hopefully, ISIS won't cause the next WW.

I think this is nonsense. The west has not even deployed 1% of its military capacity against ISIS. If the threat were really that great, there would be B-52s B1's and B2 circling over Syria constantly with special forces roaming the hills calling out targets. It would be over in weeks. Its also pretty clear on which side the Chinese and Indians would fight, as well as the Russians. In addition to all that conventional capacity IS faces about 10000 nuclear warheads. In the war of civilizations you can count on at best about 250M muslims vs about 6.5B infidels and moderate muslims..with the technological advantage FIRMLY in the hands of the infidels. I am not sure if there are 250Mx 70 virgins available in paradise.

 

[red]

Where are they getting these nukes? Iraq didnt have them. Remember?

 

[saxon]

Where are they getting these nukes? Iraq didnt have them. Remember?

Nukes are available on the black market, especially from Russia. Many former military and intelligence officers are now involved in organized crime. You can buy almost anything from the Russian mob.

 

[Big Sleazy]

Why don't we join up forces with Russia, China, and Iran and wipe ISIS off the map ? That's what Putin offered at the UN yesterday.... oh ya, because ISIS is a CIA, MOSSAD, MI6 creation. Otherwise we would be over there kicking ISIS ass. But we're not. Why not ?

 

[Titalian]

I think this is nonsense. The west has not even deployed 1% of its military capacity against ISIS. If the threat were really that great, there would be B-52s B1's and B2 circling over Syria constantly with special forces roaming the hills calling out targets. It would be over in weeks. Its also pretty clear on which side the Chinese and Indians would fight, as well as the Russians. In addition to all that conventional capacity IS faces about 10000 nuclear warheads. In the war of civilizations you can count on at best about 250M muslims vs about 6.5B infidels and moderate muslims..with the technological advantage FIRMLY in the hands of the infidels. I am not sure if there are 250Mx 70 virgins available in paradise.

I agree, this is pure propaganda, from other sources. Its not hard to point the finger as to where this is coming from. Its in many peoples interest to keep the terrorist threat alive.

 

[red]

Nukes are available on the black market, especially from Russia. Many former military and intelligence officers are now involved in organized crime. You can buy almost anything from the Russian mob.

So why hasn't it happened? Because this is a fantasy. If this was true then iran would just buy nukes instead of building their own.

 

[fuji]

Where are they getting these nukes? Iraq didnt have them. Remember?

Pakistan, Iran, you just need one lunatic military commander with a nuke who likes the idea of blowing up New York, a terrorist willing to serve as a suicide bomber, and a container on a ship. Get as close to port as possible and detonate it when the Americans start trying to open the container, or the container gets unloaded, whichever comes first.

 

[red]

Pakistan, Iran, you just need one lunatic military commander with a nuke who likes the idea of blowing up New York, a terrorist willing to serve as a suicide bomber, and a container on a ship. Get as close to port as possible and detonate it when the Americans start trying to open the container, or the container gets unloaded, whichever comes first.

Sure but iran doesnt have nukes.

This nuclear fantasy has been used to instill fear for years. Its just crap and will never happen.

 

[rt-24]

also, please note the source (washingtontimes)

 

[fuji]

Sure but iran doesnt have nukes.

Yet. And this kind of thing is why they never should.

Note that waiting for it to happen before responding means millions die before you act. There are certainly people in the world with piles of money who would nuke the US, Canada, EU, if they could.

Non proliferation enforcement and nuclear security agencies exist to make sure they never will.

#1 reason why Iran must be stopped.

 

[nottyboi]

Nukes are available on the black market, especially from Russia. Many former military and intelligence officers are now involved in organized crime. You can buy almost anything from the Russian mob.

No they are not. Maybe Pakistan or N. Korea may have some looser controls on them, but anyone that tries to sell a nuke has a death warrant on them. No intelligence service around the world would hesitate to kill them on sight if capture and a long torture session is not available. The top intelligence organizations are pretty obsessed with this, not just because a nuke can do so much damage, but because of the fear it will trigger a nuclear war.

 

[red]

Yet. And this kind of thing is why they never should.

Note that waiting for it to happen before responding means millions die before you act. There are certainly people in the world with piles of money who would nuke the US, Canada, EU, if they could.

Non proliferation enforcement and nuclear security agencies exist to make sure they never will.

#1 reason why Iran must be stopped.

Great but has nothing to do with isis getting nuke which is extremely unlikely. Kooky even

 

[Titalian]

Pakistan, Iran, you just need one lunatic military commander with a nuke who likes the idea of blowing up New York, a terrorist willing to serve as a suicide bomber, and a container on a ship. Get as close to port as possible and detonate it when the Americans start trying to open the container, or the container gets unloaded, whichever comes first.

You should write comic books. This is pure propaganda And I'd worry more about Pakistan than Iran. LOL

 

[danmand]

Pakistan, Iran, you just need one lunatic military commander with a nuke who likes the idea of blowing up New York, a terrorist willing to serve as a suicide bomber, and a container on a ship. Get as close to port as possible and detonate it when the Americans start trying to open the container, or the container gets unloaded, whichever comes first.

Oh, a lunatic military commander. Are Israeli commanders immune to mental illness? Or does only Iranian military commanders develop mental health issues?

And, Ahem, Israel has nuclear weapons, Iran does not.

 

[GPIDEAL]

I think this is nonsense. The west has not even deployed 1% of its military capacity against ISIS. If the threat were really that great, there would be B-52s B1's and B2 circling over Syria constantly with special forces roaming the hills calling out targets. It would be over in weeks. Its also pretty clear on which side the Chinese and Indians would fight, as well as the Russians. In addition to all that conventional capacity IS faces about 10000 nuclear warheads. In the war of civilizations you can count on at best about 250M muslims vs about 6.5B infidels and moderate muslims..with the technological advantage FIRMLY in the hands of the infidels. I am not sure if there are 250Mx 70 virgins available in paradise.

The problem with your scenario is that ISIS is not a nation to bomb. They are guerrilla warriors and terrorists. Their nukes will be sneaked in, not launched within ICBMs.

 

[Titalian]

Oh, a lunatic military commander. Are Israeli commanders immune to mental illness? Or does only Iranian military commanders develop mental health issues?

And, Ahem, Israel has nuclear weapons, Iran does not.

Actually there is nothing more treacherous than a Israeli Mossad.

 

[Keebler Elf]

ISIS intends to get its hands on nuclear weapons...

Yeah, like every other terrorist organization.

Intent is one thing, Reality is something altogether different.