S
Is The Threat Of ISIS To Canada Putting Bill C-36 On The Back Burner?
- Thread starter lovelatinas
- Start date
I hate this fucking government. Mackay and Harper can fuck themselves and rot in hell.
Thank you for your insight on gun control... I wasn't aware the gun of choice by the gang-bangers was a .22 or deer rifle.
Fair enough, punish them in the only way we can by not giving them your vote. However if you think Justine or Mulclair will go near this law once it is in place you are mistaken.
I have absolutely no intention whatsoever of ever voting Conservative under any circumstances whatsoever never, never, ever, never, never, ever!
What a vile and odious regime this is. 376 days and counting. It can't come soon enough. I wish it was sooner. God how I hate these people!
DO you believe if challenged which it will be Mulclair or Justine would appeal and bring in more ridiculous laws? If The Reformers were to win another majority, they will strengthen their position with appointments in the SCC, they will further go after porn and other sexual domains, they rule with God in mind. They need to go and be decimated in 2015.
Never mind ISIS, those idiots are pipsqueaks compared to what Mother Nature latest scourge Ebola. Harper insisted that Canada play a combat role, Secretary of State Kerry just wanted us take the humanitarian initiative. Harper is such a studmuffin! Have you heard his new theme song.
I think that the Liberals and the NDP don't want to go anywhere near this. If it is challenged, and IF it is struck-down by the SCC then they may have to. But that will be years from now.
My point is they (NDP or LIBERAL) will only reopen this bill if their hands are forced (by SCC). Don't think a change in government in 2015 will mean a change in C36.
Typical anti-gun rhetoric. Don't let facts get in the way of a good argument.
Btw, the government didn't choose to make this an issue. Bedford challenged the law and the SCC's decision tossed out the old laws. Also, this isn't about consensual sex. This is about commercial sex, of which an implicit assumption is that it is consensual.
Agreed. People seem to forget the role of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition, and the reality of retail politics.
There's much more to the Firearms Act than the long-gun registry.
All firearms owners still need to hold a Firearms License (PAL)
By law, ownership of any handgun needs to be approved by the OPP (CFO) in Ontario
By law, handguns still need to be registered
By law, handguns cannot be carried openly or concealed
By law, handguns can only be transported in a locked case between home and an approved range via the most direct route.
BY law, handguns need to be stored in a locked metal case with a trigger lock
Not that these legal requirements matter to gangbangers anyway.
Every time I see such comments, I"m tempted to vote Conservative again. Then I give my head a shake......
Someone made a comment in another thread which does hold some truth.
"People who don't vote Conservative because of Bill C-36 can't see past the end of their dick".
I believe people are entitled to vote on a single issue, but that mentality could be worse.
I hate what Harper is doing with this Bill C-36 and perhaps other laws concerning privacy of communications or personal info (with Homeland Security), but if the economy or business isn't strong, you won't be able to poon in the first place.
Justin has a lot of fluff, but how bad can it be with him in power?
What's the real risk of the hobby with trusted independents or agencies?
"People who don't vote Conservative because of Bill C-36 can't see past the end of their dick".
I believe people are entitled to vote on a single issue, but that mentality could be worse.
I hate what Harper is doing with this Bill C-36 and perhaps other laws concerning privacy of communications or personal info (with Homeland Security), but if the economy or business isn't strong, you won't be able to poon in the first place.
Justin has a lot of fluff, but how bad can it be with him in power?
What's the real risk of the hobby with trusted independents or agencies?
"I won't vote Cons because of C36" - that just sounds dumb to me (unless your livelihood depends on the industry or you're an 18 year boy exploding with jizz).
"I won't vote Cons because they trample individual freedoms" - I can get my head around that, but then again, I don't see how the left/socialiasts (greater common good, blah blah barf) would do better?
JT has some ideas I don't like (long gun registry, urban gun bans). He's also green when it comes to geopolitical issues (but that can be solved by good advisors).
Anyways, back to the OP's point - C36 won't fall off the table because of ISIS. But you'll note how they rammed through the final reading and the vote on sending troops. The problem is not that C36 will be forgotten. The problem is that taking the country to war is a much bigger/more serious issue that will capture media attention. Who gives a crap about philanderers getting their dicks wet now?
"I won't vote Cons because they trample individual freedoms" - I can get my head around that, but then again, I don't see how the left/socialiasts (greater common good, blah blah barf) would do better?
JT has some ideas I don't like (long gun registry, urban gun bans). He's also green when it comes to geopolitical issues (but that can be solved by good advisors).
Anyways, back to the OP's point - C36 won't fall off the table because of ISIS. But you'll note how they rammed through the final reading and the vote on sending troops. The problem is not that C36 will be forgotten. The problem is that taking the country to war is a much bigger/more serious issue that will capture media attention. Who gives a crap about philanderers getting their dicks wet now?
You sound like a Conservative with a capital C. You likely vote for them for purely ideological reasons -- it doesn't matter how much they infringe on your personal rights ( for example in 2 months time it won't be safe for you to be posting at a website such as this one so C36 is not just about 'exploding with jizz'!) - I'm sure even if Harper admitted to smoking crack you would still vote for him.
You are right, however, it is the message that this Government have been trying to convey in the name of freedom. So as their supporters are gun owners they want to assure them that the long gun registry infringed their rights, and not only abolished that law, but ordered all the records to be destroyed. The law was originally passed so that it would be extended to severely restrict the use to other types of arms, but lo and behold we are back to square one. Now it is getting more and more easy to get hold of these weapons, and needs to be legislated to prevent it's spread, not legislating for turning "johns" into criminals for exercising their rights to indulge in the oldest profession. You might as well vote Conservative if you buy their ridiculous arguments.
