Is Little Darlings new website current?

[bsi]

I see my other thread got hijacked into a pissing contest about domain registration Would it be rude to ask that those combatants keep their discussion over there and not contaminate this thread? Unless they can contribute to this topic.

But in that thread, it was mentioned that LD has returned to the free site. When I went to it, it had many girls that I did not recognize, plus some previous girls who I thought had left.

http://littledarlings.rare-escort.com/inside.php

Does any one know if this site is current? I am curious if Riley is still there and if incalls are still provided. After 0/3 attempts booking incalls (no voice message returned), I stopped calling them in October.

Janet looks good too. And the descriptions of many other the other new girls looks tasty.

Anyone?

 

[Little Darlings]

We have gone back to
www.littledarlings.rare-escort.com

Riley is back as well as Layla and Nadia, along with many new faces such as Dawn, Angelica, Jade, Sami, Kyrstal and Alexis. Now remember gents all ladies book on and off as they wish to work. I can say that Janet works nights after 8pm and days before 3pm. Dawn and Kyrstal are pretty much avaliable any time. Riley is avaliable after 7pm. The rest of the ladies are hit and miss. ALL ladies are listed on the ABOUT ME PAGE.

The web site will be updated within the next few weeks.
Thank you gents for the patience.

 

[Oil Please]

I see DANA Sanchez is back at Little Darlings ! As Layla.

 

[Mr. Dajodo]

Just checked out the LD web site and it looks pretty good. Clean, uncluttered, and easy to navigate which I like. If I could make one suggestion for improvement it's in the photo section. When you click on most of the thumbs to highlight them the highlight goes smaller than the original thumbnail not bigger. Dawn and Santana's pictures are the exceptions to this. Everything else seems fine to me.

 

[Mr. Dajodo]

I would suggest that you research the reviews to get better idea of the look of the lady in comparison to the pictures until LD can get some better photos taken.

KWI[/QUOTE]

After reading the two new reviews of sinfullysweetescorts.com (KWI Design) and looking at the pictures of those girls I'm just wondering how are they any better than LDs pictures? When you look at the LD pics. they look like they were taken in someones bedroom or in a motel room. Look at the SS pics and the background is almost the same. Similar poses as well. Look at the shot of Stacey of LD kneeling on the bed with her hands on her thighs. Now check out Mysie of SS kneeling on the bed with her hands on her thighs in a similar pose. Big boobed girls Tonya of LD vs. Scarlett of SS with similar shots of them with their thumbs seductively tugging on their panties at the hip. In fact to me the two websites pictures almost look like the same person took them, although they likely were not.

I'm not trying to start a fight her but if you want to talk about unflattering shots some shots of Mystie of SS make her look sickly thin. One shot, the second one in from the left, of her in the blue bra and panties, makes her look like an amputee. Seriously it looks like her left arm is severed from the elbow down! (to some guys thats their fetish but anyway that's another topic)

I'm not saying this ones pictures are better than that ones pictures but to me, quality of shots/poses they are the same. I must say though the thumbs of the girls on the KWI sites expand 3 or 4 times when highlighted compared to the LD thumbs were some stay the same size or go smaller.

 

[Mr. Dajodo]

Ok SS is new and they might invest in better quality shots down the road. I'll buy that. C&E has been around for well over a year and do their pictures look better than LD? NBM? I know they are newer than C&E, but still to me their shots are no better.

I don't dislike you KWI. Thats not true at all. I have never meet you to form an opinion of you one way or the other. I was just commenting on some of the things you say in this post and others. In this post you implied the LD pictures aren't very good. All I am saying is SS, NBM & C&E shots to me are no better. No worse also. Allureyou. Now there are some unappealing shots. Belinda with her big dirty brown eye lookin' up at the lens. Yewww.

For the record I think it's great you have moved on to web design. They look 100 times better than anything I could do. In your previous carrier I read nothing but good about sessions with you. I liked you enough 3 years ago to book with you twice. Never did see you though, first I had to cancel and the second time you did.

So there. I'm not a total asshole to you. Just 75% of one.

 

[Mr. Dajodo]

Yes.

*also I never thought or was trying to imply that you took the pictures on the sites designed by you.

 

[Oil Please]

I like this site. Its easy to use. When will you be putting more pics on the site?

 

[fip]

Perhaps my browser is off but the site doesn't behave for me

I like this site. Its easy to use. When will you be putting more pics on the site?

When I click on a picture of a lady the thumbnail is 1" tall. Then the page of thumbnails dims out and the thumbnail takes over but at about 3/4ths of an inch in size. I suppose I could use my windows machine to browse these sites but with so many sites that take over your machine once you click on an image, I don't think I can trust them all.

fip

 

[i am one]

When I click on a picture of a lady the thumbnail is 1" tall. Then the page of thumbnails dims out and the thumbnail takes over but at about 3/4ths of an inch in size.

That's what it's supposed to look like.

I can't believe it takes some agencies so long to update their website, roster or add photos. When I'm at work and tell the webmaster I want something done, he'll have the updated page live within an hour.

 

[Mr. Dajodo]

When I click on a picture of a lady the thumbnail is 1" tall. Then the page of thumbnails dims out and the thumbnail takes over but at about 3/4ths of an inch in size.

fip

Thats what I meant in post #4.

Guess they haven't improved this yet.

 

[Angela@SinfullySweets]

I would suggest that you research the reviews to get better idea of the look of the lady in comparison to the pictures until LD can get some better photos taken.

KWI

After reading the two new reviews of sinfullysweetescorts.com (KWI Design) and looking at the pictures of those girls I'm just wondering how are they any better than LDs pictures? When you look at the LD pics. they look like they were taken in someones bedroom or in a motel room. Look at the SS pics and the background is almost the same. Similar poses as well. Look at the shot of Stacey of LD kneeling on the bed with her hands on her thighs. Now check out Mysie of SS kneeling on the bed with her hands on her thighs in a similar pose. Big boobed girls Tonya of LD vs. Scarlett of SS with similar shots of them with their thumbs seductively tugging on their panties at the hip. In fact to me the two websites pictures almost look like the same person took them, although they likely were not.

I'm not trying to start a fight her but if you want to talk about unflattering shots some shots of Mystie of SS make her look sickly thin. One shot, the second one in from the left, of her in the blue bra and panties, makes her look like an amputee. Seriously it looks like her left arm is severed from the elbow down! (to some guys thats their fetish but anyway that's another topic)

Mr. Dajodo,

I came across this thread and have read your concerns regarding our photos very carefully. While I may disagree with you on most of your issues, I want to ensure all the gentlemen here, that we are doing the best we can and hopefully we will continue to grow into a much better agency as we go on. We have just updated our photos again, and this will be Mystie's 3rd set of photos since we started just a little over 2 months ago.

I can assure you that we have not copied location or poses, nor have we used the same photographer. The ladies I have hired have never done this sort of work before this and therefore have never had to pose for pictures either. They just did what came naturally. The typical poses that you would see anywhere. If you have any ideas for poses or locations, you are more then welcome to email or PM me your suggestions.

Again, I am sorry that you feel there are some issues regarding our photos, however our clients seem to like them and that is really all that concerns me the most - our clients.

Sinfully Yours,
Angela Haven

 

[Oil Please]

I think the pictures are great. Best website is shwa land

 

[gramps]

LIttle Darlings website doesn't work anymore. Anyone know if they are still arround.

 

[hot stuff88]

They are still around but having some technical difficulties.I was talking to Joe earlier today and he is working on the problem.If you want to book your better off to call and see who is available.