Depends entirely on how you define "lead the US into new wars", of course.President Trump was the first president since Carter that did not lead the US into new wars. An inconvenient truth for Trump haters I know.
President Obama came into office seven years ago pledging to end the wars of his predecessor, George W. Bush. On May 6, with eight months left before he vacates the White House, Mr. Obama passed a somber, little-noticed milestone: He has now been at war longer than Mr. Bush, or any other American president.
Yes, this is true,
And Trump's failure to win election means he didn't get to tie this record yet. (He can only break it if he manages a third term, of course.)
But, depending on how you are defining "at war", he still has a shot at it, so don't give up hope!
Do you know nothing of US foreign policy since WWII?Now how can such a nice-guy president be at war for so long and hold that record?
Pretty sure Trump haters didn't go back in time and get Obama involved in wars.Answer: because Trump haters give him a pass on that and keep it quiet.
Also, on what planet was it "kept quiet" that the US was is conflicts throughout Obama's time as President?
It was a pretty constant subject of discussion.
Hell, you even posted (more than once) New York Times articles about it.
That's not exactly being "kept quiet".





