Especially when you are Phil and try to red them in isolation or don't really know how to read them.
Interesting read re. Global warming
- Thread starter Moraff
- Start date
Dudes...no body gives a shit about global warming anymore...give it up, it's hay-day has come and gone. we are on to much greater, and more popular issues ie; bullying....do you inow anyone who ISNT a victim of bullying these days??? or who doesnt know someone who is bi-polar or ADHD??? c'mon lets get current and drop last decades now dead topics.
I agree.
It's pretty much a dead issue -- even so-called progressives like Barack Obama don't really care about it anymore.
Short term memory problems lately, Phil?
From post 69 on this thread:
There are two problems with your theory that there has been no warming in the last 16 years.
First, its wrong.
Second, you do not take into consideration the lag time with CO2 in the atmospher.
No its not wrong. Phil Jones has admitted no warming in last 16 years or so
Okay, can you explain the science behind this delay?? And can you also please tell us how many years/decades we have until the delay is over and the warming kicks in??
Phil Jones did not say that, but I expect that even were I to explain to you what he did say you'd continue on with repeating the same claim.
Tell you what, with your obvious belief in your understanding of the science why don't you give it a shot, then I'll correct you when you come up with the wrong reasons. Which I guarantee you will, you're not smart enough to understand it.
Thats what I thought. Groggy cant answer my simple question.
I'll repeat it again:
Can you explain the science behind this delay?? And can you also please tell us how many years/decades we have until the delay is over and the warming kicks in??
I'm waiting for a detailed response, groggy
Might wanna try spelling that again so we know what you're talking about
Too thick to figure it out? Your position is so weak you have to resort to that. The word is 'read'.
You usual quality post. Back in your create. Did you change your cargo pants and wash your crocs this week yet?
Don't let Phil see you spelling mistake. He 'll get all pissy.
According to the article in the original post, Jones did say the Earth had reached a plateau (although he now says 16 years isn`t enough time to know).
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html
What I find interesting is Jones` assertion that we don`t know what the climate is doing.
Hmm.
Back in April, I started a rather controversial thread that cited James Lovelock saying we don`t know what the climate is doing (https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...dmits-we-don-t-know-what-the-climate-is-doing). In response, I was accused of being a Creationist-like member of the Flat Earth Society who doesn`t know a thing about science.
Now that Phil Jones is saying the same thing, I wonder if he and the others at the IPCC are also Creationist-like members of the Flat Earth Society who don`t know a thing about science?
He doesn't? How so?
What struck me from the initial read of the report id the choice of '16' years to track, not a more conventional 10, 15, or 20. I guess they need to cherry pick the best years to make their opinion stand. On a longer time line it's not unusual to to a 10/15 year anomaly. on a longer time line, say 150/250 years, the trend is definitely up. Records show that 1998, 2010, and 2012 were there of the hottest years of record. If you look a the trend on a dec ade by decade basis, the trend id definitely up for many decades.
Donors had to put the squeeze on Obama to get him to even mention the issue at the Democratic convention:
http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-election/obama-being-pressed-to-respond-on-climate-20120904
Meanwhile, a look at the overall content of the speeches at the convention found it was virtually a non-issue for Democrats.
http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/06/c...on-it-once-in-over-80-speeches-over-two-days/
And, of course, Al Gore was nowhere to be seen at the convention.
http://www.tampabay.com/news/politi...ent-at-democratic-national-convention/1249843
Can't get much past you today.
I see you cherry pick your targets, good to know, and much like your scientific facts.
'Virtually' a non issue?
Al Gore was much the same like Cheney, Bush and Steele. As I said earlier Gore is yesterday's man. It's much bigger than him now. If Obama didn't care about the environment why did he make a decision that was quite unpopular regarding the pipeline?
