In the 21st century, anti-Zionism means anti-Semitism

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!

Muhammad met with Ibn Abi al-Huqaiq, al-Katibah and al-Watih[57] to discuss the terms of surrender. As part of the agreement, the Jews of Khaybar were to evacuate the area, and surrender their wealth. The Muslims would cease warfare and not hurt any of the Jews. After the agreement, some Jews approached Muhammad with a request to continue to cultivate their orchards and remain in the oasis. In return, they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims.[57] According to Ibn Hisham's version of the pact with Khaybar, it was concluded on the condition that the Muslims "may expel you [Jews of Khaybar] if and when we wish to expel you." Norman Stillman believes that this is probably a later interpolation intended to justify the expulsion of Jews in 642.[49] The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of dhimmis, (non-Muslims under Muslim rule).[11][13][14]
 

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,586
3,256
113
ROTFLMFAO!!!!!

Muhammad met with Ibn Abi al-Huqaiq, al-Katibah and al-Watih[57] to discuss the terms of surrender. As part of the agreement, the Jews of Khaybar were to evacuate the area, and surrender their wealth. The Muslims would cease warfare and not hurt any of the Jews. After the agreement, some Jews approached Muhammad with a request to continue to cultivate their orchards and remain in the oasis. In return, they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims.[57] According to Ibn Hisham's version of the pact with Khaybar, it was concluded on the condition that the Muslims "may expel you [Jews of Khaybar] if and when we wish to expel you." Norman Stillman believes that this is probably a later interpolation intended to justify the expulsion of Jews in 642.[49] The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of dhimmis, (non-Muslims under Muslim rule).[11][13][14]
Clueless.

But thanks for confirming there was no massacre. Just a victory for the Muslims. And the page you linked to outlines the uses of the phrase being chanted….not a single chant talks about a massacre of Jews

Absolutely clueless.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,110
21,993
113
The death squads were busy again.


Terrorizing children.

And using children as human shields.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Klatuu

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
Clueless.

But thanks for confirming there was no massacre. Just a victory for the Muslims. And the page you linked to outlines the uses of the phrase being chanted….not a single chant talks about a massacre of Jews

Absolutely clueless.
Can't solve 2 and 2, eh? Pretty normal for your kind. Don't beat yourself up.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,307
6,665
113
You were talking about a British woman who moved to a 'settlement' and was driving with her two girls, ...
Thanks for admitting you think it's okay to target people simply for having Jewish licence plates while in the West Bank. Every single one of the rights groups you pretend to support are clear that driving while Jewish isn't a terrorist act and are clear that even if settlements are illegal, simply living in one does not make one a war criminal or an armed combatant.

It's is also part of your disgusting double standard to claim that it's okay to target a car because maybe one of the passengers would join the army while also claiming that the PIJ terrorist heading their war crime rocket division is an innocent civilian and Israel can't shoot back at Palestinian gunmen.

You're a disgusting racist and you know it but somehow you have a completely irrational cognitive dissonance to convince yourself that you're somehow the good guy.

More terrorism/war crimes for you to justify.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,307
6,665
113
Yes you have, continually.
You've called the settlers in the flag march 'random Jews'...
Bullshit. Find one post where I said people in a racist march were really good guys. I can find many posts where I condemned them as racist trash but in your insane world view, you need to pretend that I back them.

On the other hand, you have repeatedly justified attacks targeting people your own groups consider to be civilians as in the post I quoted above. I guess it's one place where you actually agree with Palestinians instead of telling them what to want.
1685493133251.png
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,307
6,665
113
Clueless
...
Yes, people calling for death of people because of their religion are clueless and deserve to be condemned. So do the people who agree with them.

I've repeatedly condemned the ultra-nationalist Jews who chanted "death to Arabs". Of course you won't condemn calls for the death of Jews because. Do you agree with them?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,110
21,993
113
Thanks for admitting you think it's okay to target people simply for having Jewish licence plates while in the West Bank.
Thank you for confirming apartheid in the form of license plates based on race.

You've stated you think its ok for Israelis to target Palestinians if they think they are militants, now you have to accept that if Palestinians think those foreign settlers are militants or terrorists they also have the same rights.
Oh wait, you support apartheid so of course you don't think Palestinians should have any rights, let alone the right self defence.

You don't believe in basic human rights for Palestinians, do you?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,110
21,993
113
Both sides should stop targeting civilians, but since you refuse to say Israel should stop targeting civilians its unreasonable to expect those suffering the illegal occupation to play by rules you won't hold Israel to.
From your article:

Over the past year, Palestinian gunmen have repeatedly targeted troops carrying out arrest raids, military posts, Israeli settlements and civilians on the roads.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant was set to hold an assessment on the recent attack later on Tuesday, his office said.

Tensions between Israel and the Palestinians have been elevated for the past year, with the military carrying out near-nightly raids in the West Bank, in the wake of a series of deadly Palestinian terror attacks.


Sounds like Palestinians are responding to the death squads by attacking Israelis who are illegally occupying their land.
They should clearly identify themselves as civilians or move to a place that isn't illegally occupied and undergoing violent resistance.

Or Israel should end the occupation and/or apartheid.

 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,307
6,665
113
Both sides should stop targeting civilians, ...
And still claiming that the PIJ terrorist heading their war crime rocket team is a civilian while a woman driving her daughters for a visit is a valid target. Shit your racism is repugnant.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,307
6,665
113
Thank you for confirming apartheid in the form of license plates based on race.
...
Another of your moronic claims trying to justify attacking someone simply because of their perceived plate.

Israeli registered cars have a specific plate used by Israeli Jews, Israeli Arabs, and rental companies based in Israel. Pretty disgusting that instead of claiming that Jews are valid targets because some other Jews have committed violence, you've now moved to claiming that simply having an Israeli registered plate makes on a valid target.
 
Toronto Escorts