Improving English

Jade4u

It's been good to know ya
Dear Sir,
The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility. As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter. There will be growing publik enthusiansm in the sekond year when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf 20% shorter. In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage, where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing the "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from words kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vl hav a reil sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Zen ve vil rul ze vorld!!!!

Signed: Richard Thurman, Oxon, UK
 
stacey4u2luv said:
The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter. .........

Looks like the keyboards will have to keep that C after all.

stacey4u2luv said:
In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted to reach the stage, where more komplikated changes are possible.
 
High_Roller said:
There is a langauge called Esperanto. There are groups around the world, who believe that this should be a universal language for the world. Here's their website:

http://esperanto-usa.org/node/3?PHPSESSID=43aed9ddea47ed9229fc892e282093b6

Esperanto is one of several "universal" languages, esparanto being the largest of all. Esperanto is one of the better ones because it is more based on the sounds that other cultures use, thus making it easier to learn by all. Other less successful attempts at a universal language are more based on Euro-languages, where others e.g. East Asians may have difficulty learning.

Is a universal language neccessary, yes i think so. But there would be many who would say that money could be better spent on reducing poverty. I do believe that over time a language will eventually dominate and become an unoffical universal language. I think it will be either Spanish or Chinese (Mandarin). Reason being Spanish-speaking people in the US is rising and since a lot of commerce is based on the US, others would need to speak Spanish in order to communicate. China is also becoming an influental market and people will have to speak Chinese in order to take advantage.

Cincerly
VonAnEnMiPokit
 
1HandInMyPocket said:
I do believe that over time a language will eventually dominate and become an unoffical universal language. I think it will be either Spanish or Chinese (Mandarin). Reason being Spanish-speaking people in the US is rising and since a lot of commerce is based on the US, others would need to speak Spanish in order to communicate. China is also becoming an influental market and people will have to speak Chinese in order to take advantage.
Already is.

Spanish, official lang of U.S. service industry.

Chinese & Korean, taken over for Japanese tourist signs in Europe. Pretty funny, easier to find travel brochure in Chinese & Korean than in English.