Not sure I noticed if anyone mentioned another basic point. Sure anyone can sue anyone, but you probably won't win and even more so if you do win, what makes you think you have any chance of collecting from an sp? Maybe she owns a home? Some do.
If an SP outed a client, couldn't she be sued under the Privacy Act?
- Thread starter barnacler
- Start date
I've been outted. No you won't win a law suit. The problem is, what is revealed is true. You can't be mad someone told a truth. "That bad man told my mother I'm a hooker!" "Well, are you a hooker?" "uhh, yes" "I rest my case".**
It's not criminal. Only if physical harm is threatened. How do I know this? A few yrs ago I spent hours with police pouring through the things competitors did to me & my family, including piles of documentation, records, finger prints on threatening mail sent to my family, voice recordings, emails, IP addresses, privy info about their further plans to harass me, etc.**
As for FB, always always always block people from being able to see your friends list! Don't add or answer unknown people. Even replying to a msg then allows that user to see more of your profile. Don't engage with anyone you know in this hobby world with your personal fb. Etc etc etc.**
Think ahead, plan for the worst, have your story straight, and protect yourself before this shit happens.
It's not criminal. Only if physical harm is threatened. How do I know this? A few yrs ago I spent hours with police pouring through the things competitors did to me & my family, including piles of documentation, records, finger prints on threatening mail sent to my family, voice recordings, emails, IP addresses, privy info about their further plans to harass me, etc.**
As for FB, always always always block people from being able to see your friends list! Don't add or answer unknown people. Even replying to a msg then allows that user to see more of your profile. Don't engage with anyone you know in this hobby world with your personal fb. Etc etc etc.**
Think ahead, plan for the worst, have your story straight, and protect yourself before this shit happens.
If you are worried about being outed by SP simply get one of those Internet aps for your phone like text me. I am pretty sure you can call from it too. Or stick to the reputable incall agencies without any worries of being outed.
Sexy Friends Toronto
There is nothing wrong with this law. I get pictures from certain ladies once in a while. These pictures were ment for my personal view only. I would never dare to publish them or share with others.
People who do deserve to be punish.
I once had a client tell me if I contacted the police and showed them e-mails that he had sent to me that it was an invasion of privacy. In the end, I never did because he agreed to leave me alone but I have the right to protect myself from harm.
I think you can advise police of harassment, threatening or similar types of these emails against someone and no bs privacy thing is going to protect these losers.
I'm no lawyer but my knowledge would say...no? I could be wrong.
My experience with unfortunate run ins with LE is they are trying to nail the "clients". As in "do you have someone coming now?" But if you're smart you know how to talk to LE to avoid this. A girl should never out a client unless he's being a danger to her. Then she has ALL the right to do so.
My experience with unfortunate run ins with LE is they are trying to nail the "clients". As in "do you have someone coming now?" But if you're smart you know how to talk to LE to avoid this. A girl should never out a client unless he's being a danger to her. Then she has ALL the right to do so.
There is absolutely no law in Canada that protects your personal privacy in the way many of you think it does.
Most legislation covers public bodies which must protect your personal information. The only law that involves private companies is the "Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act" which essentially just covers the data you provide companies.
The only thing on your side is a common law expectation of privacy under the idea of "intrusion upon seclusion": The key features of this cause of action are, first, that the defendant’s conduct must be intentional, within which I would include reckless; second that the defendant must have invaded, without lawful justification, the plaintiff’s private affairs or concerns; and third, that a reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive causing distress, humiliation or anguish. A claim for intrusion upon seclusion will arise only for deliberate and significant invasions of personal privacy. Claims from individuals who are sensitive or unusually concerned about their privacy are excluded: it is only intrusions into matters such as one’s financial or health records, sexual practices and orientation, employment, diary or private correspondence that, viewed objectively on the reasonable person standard, can be described as highly offensive
Most legislation covers public bodies which must protect your personal information. The only law that involves private companies is the "Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act" which essentially just covers the data you provide companies.
The only thing on your side is a common law expectation of privacy under the idea of "intrusion upon seclusion": The key features of this cause of action are, first, that the defendant’s conduct must be intentional, within which I would include reckless; second that the defendant must have invaded, without lawful justification, the plaintiff’s private affairs or concerns; and third, that a reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive causing distress, humiliation or anguish. A claim for intrusion upon seclusion will arise only for deliberate and significant invasions of personal privacy. Claims from individuals who are sensitive or unusually concerned about their privacy are excluded: it is only intrusions into matters such as one’s financial or health records, sexual practices and orientation, employment, diary or private correspondence that, viewed objectively on the reasonable person standard, can be described as highly offensive
Before suing ask yourself if she has the money to pay you if you win. Suing for an uncollectable judgment is a waste of time.
You can always share info with police, he was on crack
Even if there was a privacy issue (which there probably was not) worst case scenario is you would tell the judge what was in emails and he would grant your request to turn them over to law enforcement
