Derp derp derp. I know exactly what is taught at the MBA level in finance. The math is at a very simple level, something a high school student could pick up from a basic text. Considering how many people haven't touched any series math since their first few years of undergrad they have no choice. The Management Science people seem to get exposed to the heavier math, they did in the one second year "Q" course I did, I didn't see too many finance people. Msc in finance, I'd guess that would be different, but I wouldn't know. Unlike some people I will not use google in an attempt to pretend that I do.
As for drunk, I just called bullshit and put forward some quotes from a finance prof, one of which is illustrative of the attitude, the rest just funny. You got drunk from that?
Cool story brah. Actually you are right, I bought Bre-X just before it started to catch fire and sold it a dollar from its top. I do that every year becasue I spent 200 hours a week analyzing investments. I also have a 12 inch penis. If I should believe you, you must believe me.
In the real world, there are many people who spent 80+ hours a week on analyzing investments and have access to the resources that would put the 5 richest kings of Europe to shame, and they still don't do much better than the market average in the longer term. Yeah, but your "hubby" would be disappointed with a 100% gain in a year.
Your claim. " I cannot imagine what he will be like if he ever has a year where he does not get at least 100%. "
Obviously for all your supposed intellect you don't understand compound math. Try doubling a dollar 30 times, never mind going up 5 fold.
Mathematics says 1: You are full of shit and 2: You are too stupid to know it or you couldn't be bothered to craft a more believable story.
Also none of your examples are 1 year returns and are exceptions that prove the rule. You were claiming this as standard for all investments every year.
Yes you do, if you didn't you would ignore me. You care deeply because you want to present this image by inventing a fake wife.
Also you do fully understand why I think you are a fictional character. Plenty of other people know you are a fictional character.
Your knowledge base does not match your claimed med school background. I figured that out on chat when you were blathering on about med school a while back and it just screamed at me that no med school student would have so little knowledge of the process. It screamed someone who was pretending. Your medical advice is also off base.
Your claims of intellect also scream false. Anyone with a clue would know the story you present is both unbelievable and unprovable, yet here you are trying to prove it over and over... even though it is impossible. If that isn't low IQ, I don't know what is.
You claim to be so smart, educated and well read yet you show up in a WWII thread showing a stunning amount of ignorance which only makes sense when combined with your appearance in a retro pop culture thread. Your posting is obviously a shallow attempt to brag about how young you are and thus how lucky Loki is.
Someone dragging such marks and the like would not have lost a scholarship and had to go whoring.
The idea that you found your husband at your first client is also highly unbelievably, technically possible but Pretty Woman unbelievable. Also I recall Loki on the chat rooms moping about how his new paramour was seeing clients. It stuck me as a bit pathetic back then.
An intelligent person who understands investing would not keep harping on suggesting that everyone buys 400 oz bars of gold and everyone else who doesn't is a sucker. The amount is too high for most real people to afford. Nobody can be that unconnected to reality, the only possible reason is to use it as a chance to push the narrative further down people's throats.
You or rather your creator is a horrible person and needs to work on his fiction writing abilities.
And for no reason, here is Apu.
