Yes, I'm sure they decided to marry just because of the economy.Paraphrasing, "Give the people a wedding to distract them from the real issues ..."
Well, if this was the plan it seems there hasn't been much to worry about for a looooooong time. When was the last one. Your cynicism is blinding.Paraphrasing, "Give the people a wedding to distract them from the real issues ..."
Yes, I guess I'm not a hopeless romantic like yourself.Well, if this was the plan it seems there hasn't been much to worry about for a looooooong time. When was the last one. Your cynicism is blinding.
Actually you'd be surprised how close those two are in outlook. Check it out.Yes, I guess I'm not a hopeless romantic like yourself.
The Royal Wedding (in these times) have been replaced by "Celebrity Weddings".
And, the amount of press and merchandise speaks to the cynicism in me.
T-Mobile did. They got the pockets.Somebody put a LOT of effort into making that video.
U.S. taxpayers pay far more for the U.S. Presidency.It is to be hoped that the people enjoy it. They bloody well pay for it.
Comparing Liz II to the american president again, Duck?U.S. taxpayers pay far more for the U.S. Presidency.
Poor sucker you are. You have lost it.The facts are the facts.
Here we go again, you must be bored. It cost the British public a $1.00 each, oooooooh!It is to be hoped that the people enjoy it. They bloody well pay for it.