Holy crap!

stang

Banned
Oct 24, 2002
4,946
0
0
S ontario
I wish someone would do me wrong! I can use the money.
But seriously is this too much?:


"The Canadian-born creator of the Spawn comic books, whose combined companies enjoyed earnings exceeding $50 million, is now in bankruptcy court after he borrowed a former NHL player’s name for one of his sinister character creations.

Todd McFarlane Productions Inc. of Tempe, Ariz., was forced to file for Chapter 11 protection from creditors on Friday after a U.S. jury awarded hockey player Tony Twist, also a Canadian, $15 million dollars claiming that McFarlane used his name without permission and that his publicity rights were infringed.

McFarlane created a violent mob boss character in the 1990s named Antonio Tony Twist Twistelli.

Twist, who played for the Quebec Nordiques and the St. Louis Blues, racked up over 1,000 penalty minutes before he retired in 1999, he was known for his fighting rather than his puck handling and skating skills.

He claimed the vicious comic book character hurt his image and cost him endorsements.

McFarlane made an appeal, arguing that his work was free speech, but the U.S. Supreme Court rejected it last January. The bankruptcy filing allows the comic creator’s company to continue operating and to adjust to its new financial situation, freeing it from the threat of creditors' lawsuits.

The ruling will definitely put a damper on McFarlane’s spending habits. In 1999 he shelled out $3 million for Mark McGwire’s 70th homerun baseball. Last year he paid $450,000 for Barry Bonds’ 73rd homerun ball and he owns another Sammy Sosa ball."

December 18, 2004
 
Yeah, and the loser hockey player too. He probably made more off the judgement than he did ever playing hockey. Especially for Quebec! lol

What a effed up world we live in!

What's next? If someone uses my name "tboy" in a movie I can sue for a part of the profits from the film?
 
tboy said:
If someone uses my name "tboy" in a movie I can sue for a part of the profits from the film?
TTBoy was in lots of porn flicks. Maybe you can "stick it to him" if you're man enough.
 
That lawsuit should have been thrown out.
I read Spawn and I remember the character (Tony "Twist" Twistelli) and the comic book did not mention or indicate that it was based on Tony Twist the former NHL player. I had no idea until I read about the lawsuit.
I really doubt that he lost huge endorsement contracts because of this comic character. He lost them because there are better and more well known sport figures than him.
He just did it for the money. What a lame lawsuit and a sad day for freedom of speech!!!
 
And I don't even like Todd Macfarlane.
He's a friggin goof!!!!
 
yychobbyist said:
I doubt very much that the jury award alone would put Mcfarlane's company into bankruptcy.
The bankruptcy filing should free up any bank accounts that are frozen so the company can function. It should also discourage lawyers from lining up to get involved in the case once the promise of big money goes away.
 
[
He claimed the vicious comic book character hurt his image and cost him endorsements.

December 18, 2004 [/B][/QUOTE]


Seriously....what kind of endoresement deals does Tony Twist get?
 
Re: Re: Holy crap!

Seriously....what kind of endoresement deals does Tony Twist get? [/B][/QUOTE]

Esp. since he retired 5 years ago-LOL!!
 
This also reminds me of the guy in the US who had a weight problem which he also blamed on McDonalds. It is their fault he says as they never told him the hamburgers and fries were fattening.....

I just wish instead of using "the law", Judges could use "common sense"........
 
tboy said:
This also reminds me of the guy in the US who had a weight problem which he also blamed on McDonalds. It is their fault he says as they never told him the hamburgers and fries were fattening.....

I just wish instead of using "the law", Judges could use "common sense"........


if ya want common sense on the bench. You need to make it illegal for lawyers to be judges. Pass laws that put common folks on the bench, ones that would follow the laws
 
There was a lawsuit in the States that was just nuts....A burglar got caught in the chimney of the house he was breaking into and was stuck there for 2 days(the homeowners were out of town). He sued the homeowners for having an unsafe chimney....it hadnt been cleaned in a long tme..hence he got stuck.
The craziest part is he was awarded money!
 
ClownBoy said:
No you don't want common folks on the bench - I see these "common folks" every day running red lights, going 140kmh with kids in the cars & speeding in school zones in vans. No thanks.

I want judges who can apply the laws that we craft. Lets vote for Judges. That way it reflects society opinions but they utilize the laws in place.

When judges become politicians they become less.

Common folk may not understand the complex systems in place. But that would force it to become something we might understand, too. And reduce the need for lawyers not increase it.
 
ClownBoy said:
Sorry - too much at the whim of the common folk. I don't want my fate determined by some back woods, dumb country f%#@ who's "common sense" is different then mine.

I want someone deciding things that is less emotional, can apply reason & resonableness & understand the BS of lawyers - who better then a former lawyer?

I've seen too many examples of the common folk - Simpson jury, George Bush & any reality TV. No thanks.

Are you a lawyer? Or already a judge? If so, I think your testimony is somewhat tainted.

There is no way you can defend some of the ludicrous decisions made by the courts recently.