Based on another thread where Holmes on Homes was mentioned, I thought rather than derail that thread to start another one on Holmes.
I am curious to know what people think of Holmes on Homes. There are probably more than a few people on this board either directly in, or associated with the Trades.
Personally, I am a fan of Holmes on Homes. I like his work ethic. I like the fact that he harps on doing things that exceed "the code" rather than just meet "the code" (The Code being the Ontario Building Code.)
I also like the fact that he is Canadian and never hides that fact for his show. He seems like a right on kind of guy.
However, he and the show sometimes make me wonder a bit.
90% of what Holmes claims is bang on. I think he definitely knows what he's doing and he actually is doing a lot of the work himself unlike just about every other fool out there in the home reno show world - Bob Villa as a screaming example (now there's a complete moron).
My one criticism of Holmes is that he gets a little preachy about getting permits. I believe very strongly that if one is building an addition, one needs a permit, however, I am not so convinced that you need a permit to build a new kitchen.
My other criticism of Holmes is that on some of his shows, the people truly deserve what they got, or Holmes goes way beyond what the original contractor was hired to do.
For example, there was one show that a lady and her daughter had had a fire in their East York house and the insurance company had sent in a crew to fix the joint. Now the work that the original contractor had done was definitely substandard, however, Holmes takes it upon himself to gut the ENTIRE HOUSE. The original contractor was only hired to fix the fire damage, which he did. In the episode, Holmes discovers a long abandoned oil tank in the back yard and makes a huge production out of it (which it is I grant you.) HOWEVER, the original home owner had lived there forever and had converted from oil to gas way back when and he had left the oil tank in place. That's his (the original owner's) fault. They don't mention that in the show and they try to make it seem like it was the current contractor's fault, which it was not. I'd bet that way back when when the owner's husband wanted to convert to gas that he was told how much it was to remove the buried oil tank; he had a shit fit and told the guy to leave it there and abandon it in place. Also, the entire yard was a pig's sty - how is that the responsibility of the fire contractor? Also, the main sanitary stack had collapsed beneath the basement floor (typical in older homes). How is that the fire contractor's responsiblity?
There have been other episodes like this as well.
But as a whole, I do like the show, my only gripe about that would be that there no longer seems to be any "new episodes" I just seem to catch the repeats all the time.
Curious to know the peanut gallery's opinion?
I am curious to know what people think of Holmes on Homes. There are probably more than a few people on this board either directly in, or associated with the Trades.
Personally, I am a fan of Holmes on Homes. I like his work ethic. I like the fact that he harps on doing things that exceed "the code" rather than just meet "the code" (The Code being the Ontario Building Code.)
I also like the fact that he is Canadian and never hides that fact for his show. He seems like a right on kind of guy.
However, he and the show sometimes make me wonder a bit.
90% of what Holmes claims is bang on. I think he definitely knows what he's doing and he actually is doing a lot of the work himself unlike just about every other fool out there in the home reno show world - Bob Villa as a screaming example (now there's a complete moron).
My one criticism of Holmes is that he gets a little preachy about getting permits. I believe very strongly that if one is building an addition, one needs a permit, however, I am not so convinced that you need a permit to build a new kitchen.
My other criticism of Holmes is that on some of his shows, the people truly deserve what they got, or Holmes goes way beyond what the original contractor was hired to do.
For example, there was one show that a lady and her daughter had had a fire in their East York house and the insurance company had sent in a crew to fix the joint. Now the work that the original contractor had done was definitely substandard, however, Holmes takes it upon himself to gut the ENTIRE HOUSE. The original contractor was only hired to fix the fire damage, which he did. In the episode, Holmes discovers a long abandoned oil tank in the back yard and makes a huge production out of it (which it is I grant you.) HOWEVER, the original home owner had lived there forever and had converted from oil to gas way back when and he had left the oil tank in place. That's his (the original owner's) fault. They don't mention that in the show and they try to make it seem like it was the current contractor's fault, which it was not. I'd bet that way back when when the owner's husband wanted to convert to gas that he was told how much it was to remove the buried oil tank; he had a shit fit and told the guy to leave it there and abandon it in place. Also, the entire yard was a pig's sty - how is that the responsibility of the fire contractor? Also, the main sanitary stack had collapsed beneath the basement floor (typical in older homes). How is that the fire contractor's responsiblity?
There have been other episodes like this as well.
But as a whole, I do like the show, my only gripe about that would be that there no longer seems to be any "new episodes" I just seem to catch the repeats all the time.
Curious to know the peanut gallery's opinion?