I think experience matters, if he turns out to be a bad scout than you can him...filling out a blind evaluation is interesting and I'm sure there was some interesting results, like what if some 15-year old kid had a great score...
Going from an NHL scouting position to the assistant GM of a USHL team is a huge, gigantic slide...
Rather than fire the lesser person, why not hire the person more qualified in the 1st place?
I guess my question at this point is
why not hire the person who scored higher in the evaluations?
If a 15 year old had a great score, which evidently didn't happen, then the powers that be make a decision.
Hire him/her, and see if it pans out.
Or, just hire the person with testicles because, darn it, that's who have always been hockey scouts.
I've left a couple jobs in my career to take a position paying less (I don't know if that's true in this instance).
The new position gave me more varied experience in my field.
A couple years later, in both instances, I ended up making more money.
If you can show Ms. Needham's salary with the Leafs and the Steel, we can evaluate that more fairly.
Life isn't always about the digits on a paycheck, it can be about experiences.