Blackmail is the only exposure. Ignore what Ceiling Cat stated. That is impossible in Ontario and he's made that up. In Ontario, even a commonlaw can't take half the house or half the assets unless they've been deemed equivalent to a spouse and that takes 3 years of living together. Since the Sugarbabe will never be living with you, she would never qualify as a spouse and therefore never be entitled to anything. Even though you may not like the keep your personal info to yourself to avoid blackmail and pay cash scenario, that would be the only way to try to avoid blackmail and even that may not be enough as she could try to get the info about you without you actually volunteering it.I would be worried about potential blackmail. If and when you decide to end the arrangement what's to stop her from demanding continued payment for not informing your wife of what's been going on behind her back?
If you marry the sugarbabe, then what Celing Cat described will happen.Ignore what Ceiling Cat stated.
'If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ...' Obviously you want the fantasy of an exclusive arrangement with this younger girl but a document to enforce her loyalty to the extent of excluding other personal relationships almost broaches trafficking / enslavement and would be tough to enforce (IMO).She's not a SP, at least as far as I've been able to establish without hiring a private investigator. Just someone who is attracted to older men and likes 'being looked after.'
I am pretty sure OP mentioned that he is "fixed" so I don't think he is concerned about a paternity suit. But as long as we are discussing "arrangements" of this nature in general it is worth pointing out that no arrangement, no matter how many lawyers were involved in the drafting and review of it, can shield a person from child support payments if a relationship produces a child. Child support belongs to the child and the mother does not have the right to contract out of the child's right to support before the child is born.So don't worry about it. Just make sure you wear a condom.
I wouldn't rely on books, the internet or forums for specific legal advice, but some of the counselors here appear to give sound advice for starters.Whenever legal questions like this come up, I always go to a litigation lawyer with all my questions and ask him. Sometimes I even get the person to accompany me to the meeting. It only cost $200-300 for an hour consultation. After going to the same lawyer a couple times, you build a relationship with the lawyerwhereby you can easily give a quick call or email to get the lawyer to answer a question like this for free. Don't rely on the forums for legal matters.
Exactly. Also, there's the possibility that the more she knows about the OP, the greater the risk for blackmail since he's married.If you are going to these lengths to maintain your privacy and anonymity then don't get into an arrangement. You may as well stick with SPs.
Your only legal exposure is a possible paternity suit down the road.
She is not a spouse, even common law. And the agreement is probably not legally enforceable. It's unlikely that the courts would ever enforce a contract for personal social and sexual companionship. Even in a world where prostitution may well be on the verge of becoming legally acceptable in Canada, the courts would be loathe to make an intimate agreement enforceable in the courts.
So don't worry about it. Just make sure you wear a condom.
This part disturbs me. You're married and you are demanding this. Really?It will be an excusive arrangement, she won't be allowed to see others.
I can see how the court would loathe to enforce in favour of male, but what if the facts were pro-female? For example, lets say Mary agrees to sleep with John for half a year and then John has to pay 30k for her education. John reneges. What would be the reason not to enforce against John? He received consideration and it was not illegal.Your only legal exposure is a possible paternity suit down the road.
She is not a spouse, even common law. And the agreement is probably not legally enforceable. It's unlikely that the courts would ever enforce a contract for personal social and sexual companionship. Even in a world where prostitution may well be on the verge of becoming legally acceptable in Canada, the courts would be loathe to make an intimate agreement enforceable in the courts.
So don't worry about it. Just make sure you wear a condom.
Traditionally, courts have refused to enforce any contracts which involved prostitution as being immoral and therefore, improper. Nowadays, I suspect that they may change tack and say that any agreement which involves personal intimacy is not appropriate for formal legal enforcement. I'm guessing as the topic has not yet arisen. Currently, we still have the traditional argument or "immorality".I can see how the court would loathe to enforce in favour of male, but what if the facts were pro-female? For example, lets say Mary agrees to sleep with John for half a year and then John has to pay 30k for her education. John reneges. What would be the reason not to enforce against John? He received consideration and it was not illegal.
Perfectly stated!^^^^^^ good advice if you are a single guy and or a married guy who is not concerned about your wife finding out .
the OP is looking for the cherry on his sundae, at least thats my read based on his posts. He will not be able to conduct this affair without evidence. There will be little love notes, hotel bills, , phone calls, selfies ...... its his reward for the wealth he has accumulated and he feels like he deserves this.
this will therefore all come down to the sugar baby. is she mature? does she want to extract more than the arrangement? if so, he is fucked. if not, he may have the good times he seeks! all my efforts would therefore go into making sure i know who the sb is.
a written contract? LOL.