Kenpachi is not the OP who saw Hilton. He is just stating his opinion.Kenpachi, are you kidding... Just chalk it up to bad expierence and move on. You could have left at any time. I have used PK before and they have always been very reasonable with me. This is not a prefect industry and your not always going to get what you thought you were. I have ended up with a cbj a few times and was not happy but I still stayed, so its on ME.
Keep up the good work PK...
I agree with Anynym mostly. But here is a scenario, if I'm going to pay the lady's time to hold my hands for 1 hour, great, we have no problem just as long as she holds my hands for 1 hour. If she says no, I will only hold onto your wrist, after I paid her for 1 hour, then we have a problem. It's called a scam.Forgive me for staying off the topic of the original post, but ... (1) there has always been a clear distinction between Goods (chattels) and Services. And time spent with a girl in this industry is a Service. And while a "discount" on a future service might be offered by some (e.g. if you get a bad haircut, they might give you a discount on your next bad haircut), it's not as common as the complaint. (2) it's the lady's TIME you're paying for, nothing more. If you spent the time, you got the service contracted for, regardless of other expectations you may have had about how that time might have otherwise been spent. Nobody is saying there aren't higher expectations, or that there may be issues if certain expectations aren't met, but that's where public discussions and reviews come in. Financial compensation should not be expected by adults in such a situation.
Well said. That's my attitude as well.I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with kenpachi. No matter how many parallels you draw to customer service in other industries, this industry is different. I understand that this hobby is expensive, but ultimately the client should never expect a partial refund or credit because a session didn't go completely as planned. Some agencies may try to make it up, but in my opinion this is not necessary. The fact is that Pink Kitty is a successful agency, despite their philosophy that the customer is not always right, shows that they are not scamming people. The not-so-great or more restrictive sessions are a risk that you take whenever you participate.
I go into any session with minimal expectations from an escort - just sex (CBJ and/or CFS). She may be advertised as providing every acronym under the sun, DFK, BBBJ, DATY, CIM etc., but to me every encounter is YMMV, and if she chooses not to provide every item on the menu for whatever reason, I understand. If I'm not satisfied, I chalk it up to experience and move on.
That being said, you are completely within your rights to express your opinions and tell others about your experience - that's what this board is for. Some girls are more YMMV than others, and sharing this information will temper expectations accordingly.
I have to disagree with you on that. We all know that the statement of "paying for the time" is just taking advantage of a loophole in the US criminal code on prostitution that has been copied here in Canada. If you see an SP, it's not for her time, it's for the service she is providing, and everybody knows that. If an sp or an agency is promising a specific service, then it must be provided for the majority of clients (and can be denied to only those who lack hygiene and are disrespectful). When I see an sp I am not paying her to tell her about my day (I can do that with my friends for free), but to have intercourse with her. And if an sp advertizes that she is a sub and she turns out not to be a sub, then that is a scam even if she "officially" says on her website that you are paying for her time only.(2) it's the lady's TIME you're paying for, nothing more.