Not sure if I think this is more early D&D or Conan.
This is all gorgeous, but given there are a bunch of photo threads, I think the point here was specifically non-photgraphic art.This is my kind of art.. isn't it considered 'erotic'
Ahh okay.. thanks so much for letting me know... I only looked at the first two pages of posts and I saw a couple of pics there but I should have looked further. This would be my favorite then..This is all gorgeous, but given there are a bunch of photo threads, I think the point here was specifically non-photgraphic art.
You want to start a thread with erotic kink/BDSM pictures, though, and I am totally down to enjoy and post to that. (We have the outfit one, but that's just clothes and not all the other aspects, really).
I like the touch of the scars on the thigh.Ahh okay.. thanks so much for letting me know... I only looked at the first two pages of posts and I saw a couple of pics there but I should have looked further. This would be my favorite then..
View attachment 171263
Personally, I think it refers to the quality of the art. The digital resolution can be amazing on a crappy piece of art imo.After looking at all posted pictures I am confused: does "high quality" refer to the quality of the art or the digital resolution of the pictures? I was hoping for the former, but, I guess, I was wrong.
I guess, I hide my sarcasm too muchPersonally, I think it refers to the quality of the art. The digital resolution can be amazing on a crappy piece of art imo.