As I stated, not the time to do this. But it remains an undeniable fact that some tragedies spark more of an emotional feeling and get people to give support. There's a large number of tragedies involving many people dying (e.g. recently a plane went down carrying military personnel and refugees - 250 dead). Why is it some get frontpage coverage while others are barely mentioned in passing? I just read an article about the mass shooting at a Mosque in Quebec where 6 died. As the article stated, there were some true acts of heroism as people attempted to stop the shooter, in some cases losing their own lives. The big differences are the victims were male and Islamic. Has there been the same outcry of support? Are people worldwide looking to donate to the victims (one guy is paralyzed)?Semple is only 1 of many who support her position. In fact far from not having anyone else say this sort of racist hateful message, she has a lot of people either saying the same thing or wishing they had said it. The feminist left is devoid of any pride of principles. These morally bankrupt sudo every-things, will sell out anything to make themselves look superior in some, even if it means at some moment, making themselves look like scumbags
Race, age, sex, etc. are all factors. Even the country - a busload of British people dying would get more coverage/support than a busload of Mexicans. It's hard to say they are clearly the reason why some tragedies are more "tragic" than others but they are definitely pieces for consideration. I remember something similar in the Maritimes involving a team bus/van crash. I don't believe it got the same daily coverage as seen on sports channels.
Or people just treat other tragedies similarly/equal.Well, perhaps all hockey clubs should have one person of color, in case of an accident.That way the monetary and the emotional outpouring can be "pure".