...
And how about resolution 1701?
Another resolution Israel doesn't have to uphold?
...
Here is the demands of 1701 (from wikipedia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1701)
My comments are in bold.
The Resolution demands:[1]
* Full cessation of hostilities (OP1) -
done by both sides for now
* Israel to withdraw all of its forces from Lebanon in parallel with Lebanese and UNIFIL soldiers deploying throughout the South (OP2)
UNIFIL has stated Israel has withdrawn
* Hezbollah to be disarmed (OP3)
Nowhere near. In fact Hezbollah brags about how much better armed they are now
* Full control of Lebanon by the government of Lebanon (OP3)
Hezbollah still controlls the south and parts of Beruit and has repeatedly threatened its own government with violence - including the current crisis over Hezbollahs assassinations which has essentially halted all parliamentary process for the past year.
* No paramilitary forces, including (and implying) Hezbollah, will be south of the Litani River (OP8).
Not done - not anywhere near. Hezbollah routinely stop the UNIFIL patrolls from entering sensitive areas through the use of force and has fortified many civilian areas.
The Resolution at the same time also emphasizes:[1]
* The need to address urgently the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers, that have given rise to the current crisis.
Hezbollah shipped back their dead bodies in exchange for child killers.
It could be argued that Israel still violates Lebanese air space but compared to the massive violations that Hezbollah creates, I don't think your argument holds weight (as usual)