Greedy bitch...
- Thread starter Ed Thomas
- Start date
Probably has as much to do with wanting "pay back" as it does with wanting more money. She's upset he's dumped her for a younger, hotter woman.
Ask any of our fine legal representatives here.You never really meet your wife/husband, until you meet them across a court room....
She has no other way to "hurt" him other than trying to get as much of his money as possible. A scorned woman is a scary thing because all logical boundaries are discarded. It wouldn't surprise me if she made claims in court about mental and sexual abuse. The courts should deny her any further funds.
Mine too. He only has $17 Billion left. How will he ever survive? It might even take him a couple months to earn back the billion he had to pay out. OTOH with the drop in oil prices, he might be down to only $9 or $10 Billion. Maybe terb can take up a collection to help out the poor dude.
Pre-nups aren't ironclad at all. If a judge rules that there is a significant difference between what the spouse would receive under the agreement, and what she would have received without one, he can rule the prenuptial agreement unfair and have it set aside. Since the main point of a prenuptial agreement is to ensure a spouse doesn't receive what they would otherwise have, that makes prenuptial agreements somewhat useless.
But if that's not enough for you, there are several other problems with pre-nups. For one thing, they don't protect future earnings. For another, they can get thrown out if they don't have a solid record of what they're protecting, or if a judge rules the spouse was under duress (ie, pre-nup was signed the day before the wedding rather than far in advance).
It's ridiculous that a pre-nup is even required. But even more ridiculous that it's so ineffectual.
But if that's not enough for you, there are several other problems with pre-nups. For one thing, they don't protect future earnings. For another, they can get thrown out if they don't have a solid record of what they're protecting, or if a judge rules the spouse was under duress (ie, pre-nup was signed the day before the wedding rather than far in advance).
It's ridiculous that a pre-nup is even required. But even more ridiculous that it's so ineffectual.
She charged 100K+interest for every blowjob what she did in the past 26 years and the girls here are the expensives right? 
Prenuptial wouldn't have changed anything about this case. She would still have been awarded the money. Those agreements are worthless in cases where a spouse can claim they have become "accustomed to a lifestyle".
Im not convinced SHE is the greedy one. If THEY built the business, reportedly now worth 18 billion.....is she due more? Less? Who knows. I don't have all the numbers in front of me. Nor the business relationship information.
May be she is due more money, morally and ethically, if not legally ( due to the cheque being deposited)
May be she is due more money, morally and ethically, if not legally ( due to the cheque being deposited)
