Gravy train found: Billy Bishop Airport

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,489
11
38
But they did address it, and were told email notification was not sufficient notice to the employees. That is well beyond an employee taking advantage of the regulations to which he has access, when the employee starts digging for (IMO) ridiculous excuses to continue to draw an 'entitlement' which is over the top. Aardvark, you are arguing that an employee who has his place of work temporarily changed to a new location within the same city should get paid for his commute, because he has to turn left on Lakeshore instead of right. This is not a guy getting moved temporarily from Toronto to Windsor; this is within the City of Toronto. Its entitlement-itis run amok.
Pearson is in the City of Mississauga. Not Toronto.

Draft your version of a fair and proper rule and post it. But stop with nonsense like '…within the same city'. Apparently the existing rule already has that sort of ignorant stupidity aplenty.

But it is in no way entitlement run amok to simply apply the existing rules agreed on in a contract. Try that one on your mortgage company to get off paying what you owe when you owe it.
 

CapitalGuy

New member
Mar 28, 2004
5,771
1
0
Jamesbond and oldjones are PERFECT examples of unionists run amok. Their assertions (well, oldjones' assertion; jamesbond seemingly created an account simply to tell me to fuck off) that a ridiculous loophole that is being exploited and that an organization's management tried to plug that loophole was rejected by unions, simply shows how out of touch with common sense and reality the socialists are. Normal everyday Canadian workers are being PAID to drive to work every day, and the unions see nothing wrong with it. This is why unions are dying a slow but necessary death. They did their good for us in the past, but are now simply sucking the life away from everything they touch. Its a good thing they won't exist 50 years from now.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts