Google Glass could be the next iPhone?

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
A new Forrester report shows that 12 percent of the U.S. population is willing to wear the augmented reality eyeglasses on an everyday basis.

Get ready, Google Glass may soon be as omnipresent as the iPhone. People will be seen walking down the street, grocery shopping, and riding the subway with the wearable tech sitting on their faces.

According to a new report by Forrester, 21.6 million U.S. online consumers, or 12 percent of the population, are willing to wear augmented reality eyeglasses if they come from a trusted brand. Forrester's report is based on surveys with more than 4,600 U.S. adults in April.

"Not since Apple's iPhone debuted in 2007 has a computing device attracted as much attention as Google Glass," Forrester analyst Sarah Rotman Epps writes in the report. "We have no doubt that in time, Glass will be the next iPhone."

Google Glass is an augmented reality wearable project. The device comes in the form of eyeglasses that can record videos, take photos, chat, get directions, look up facts on the Web, and more. While the Explore Edition prototypes shipped to developers in April, the glasses aren't expected to arrive on the market for the general public until 2014.

Epps calls those consumers who are excited to get their hands on the tech "Glass Gravitators." Half of the people in this group are generally younger, Gen Y or Z, and are interested in high-tech eyewear for utility-based apps, like navigation, camera, and place and product information. Other early adopters will most likely be people who could use the hands-free device while working, like doctors, construction managers, and farmers.

There are still several kinks that Google has to iron out before the "Glass Gravitators" will buy them. Epps points out that the short battery life and limited Mirror API currently make the gadget too limited for mass consumption. However, she writes, as Google works on improvements and new apps while the device is still in the development stage, the eyeglasses could become the "next great platform."

"Google Glass is a 'when,' not 'if' product," Epps writes. "We think it's just a matter of time until Glass takes off."
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57590384-93/google-glass-could-be-the-next-iphone/


pretty lofty prediction, but I agree with it and can't wait to get my hands on a pair. I did get to try them out recently at Dundas Square and seeing what they can do now and knowing there is so much more to come, I'm sold.

luckily when they are finally released to the general public they wont look the same and will be much cheaper.

Currently there are 2000 developers who are using them on a daily basis.
in July 8000 more people from all walks of life will be included in the experimental/exploration state of the glasses. soon you will be hearing and seeing reports from the likes of Doctors, construction workers, artists, musicians, athletes and almost everything else you can think of.
over 50000 people applied to the shared twitter/google+ campagn #ifihadglass
of which 8000 people willing to shell out $1500 and travel to Google locations to pick them up were selected
 

i am one

Well-known member
Jan 4, 2002
1,220
58
48
Canada
I look forward to trying Google Glass, but I know I'll never use them full time, or even part time. I disliked wearing glasses when I had to. That was the whole point of having laser eye surgery done, so I wouldn't have to wear glasses. Now that I have perfect vision why would I want to wear glasses again that aren't for fashion reasons?
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I doubt it but time will tell.... they will need to release it to have anything other than a hype impact.... for every positive review there are 1-2 negative reviews...
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
There are some cutting points in this ... Ala flying car for nerds...

Google Glass Will Fail.


Philip De Cortes in I.M.H.O.
4 min read
Google Glass Will Fail.

Note: A lot of the ideas here came from a conversation I had with Greg Schlomoff. We were talking about the impact Google has had on the world versus Facebook, which lead to a conversation about Google Glass.

Call me short sighted, but I really don’t think there’s much of a future for Google Glass or the new Pulse by Withings.

Why you ask? Well, that’s easy:

Google Glass forces me to adopt a new device, instead of replacing an old one.

I don’t wear glasses. I don’t carry a small 8 gram rectangular device to clip onto my belt. I carry a phone, I sometimes wear a watch, and I wear a belt. I don’t wear any bracelets, I don’t wear glasses
.

If you want me to start carrying a new device, you have to offer me an incredible value proposition, that none of my current devices offer. In the case of Google glass, it does may of the same things my cell phone does, but it doesn’t REPLACE my cell phone.

If it made glasses better (for those who wore them), then it would have a significant value proposition for that demographic. Problem is…people who wear glasses can’t wear Google Glass. The one demographic they could have gotten traction with, they cut out of their beta.

It’s not a micro improvement on something we already use, it’s a completely new device.

The iPhone worked because it created an incremental improvement around the user experience of telephones. Smart Phones already existed, people were already using portable devices as joint telephones and computing devices. (Ah, the ol’ Palm Pilot. I miss it at times). Apple created a device that enabled you to interact with it in a differentiated manner (the swipe touchscreen), with a powerful user experience around their apps, their unique operating system.

It even cannibalized a very important part of its business: The iPod. It effectively integrated the iPod into a the phone, and made it so we had to carry one less device in our lives.

The iPhone made what I already had in my pocket, so much better.

If Glass, or Pulse, or any of these wearable device companies truly wanted to get early adoption, they’d focus on creating devices that replace any items I currently have. Why not create a watch or a belt or belt buckle?

I don’t buy the efficiency argument.

The argument is that it will make it so I don’t have to pull out my phone every time I want to do something. Fair enough. Is that a really big pain point though? Do I complain every time I have to pull out my phone to take a picture? No - I don’t. There have been maybe two occasions in my entire life where I missed a cool picture because I couldn’t whip my phone out fast enough. That opportunity cost doesn’t justify adding the burden of glasses to my face permanently.

The feedback I keep hearing from people is that the user experience is awkward. The tilt your head back + voice command platform is disruptive, and somewhat antisocial. If efficiency was one of the main drivers of adoption, they should have focused more intently on the user experience of Glass. Bad UX doesn’t translate to a more efficient platform, no matter how many steps were cut
.

Additionally, The cost of adding something to my face significantly outweighs the benefits of efficiency.

It’s a physical barrier between the wearer and the world

I feel this every time i talk to someone who has Google Glasses on. It’s hard to explain, but I feel like there’s a barrier between us - I wonder if they’re going to interact with Glass at some point and do something in the middle of our conversation. It feels like they have their phone out, and they’re about to make a call, but are trying to talk to me at the same time - I’m not sure whether our conversation should be brief, or if I should be trying to meaningfully engage with the person.

Some people also seem to feel threatened by Google Glass. They wonder if they’re being recorded, and they feel like the tool could be used against them in some way.

As Greg put it, Google Glass is the equivalent of flying cars, We’ve had flying cars for some time now, but they haven’t been adopted. It’s one of those things that sounds cool to us nerds, but is wholly unpractical.

Now, you could argue that some of the arguments made above will simply go away as we get accustomed to interacting with Glass (both as wear-ers and outsiders). I don’t think that’s right. I think the culmination of all of these negatives significantly outweigh the benefits Glass adds to our lives, and that they will keep Glass from being adopted.

Google Glass will add a significant burden to my life, and it’s unclear what the advantages are. I’m going to look weird. I don’t wear glasses. It’s not replacing anything, it’s going to be IN ADDITION to what I have. With google glass I’m going to have two ways to take pictures, two ways to see if I have any new messages, two ways to do X. It may do some things better than my phone, but it isn’t replacing my phone.

If it replaced my watch, however, that would be a different story. It’s easy to add a lot of value veyond telling time, and I think I’m ready for a new watch anyways.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts