Allure Massage

GM to skip Windows Vista

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
46,948
5,751
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
The Latest MS BS...

...to stimulate lagging sales and get businesses to switch to Vista....before they do it ALL OVER AGAIN when they roll out Windows 7 next year!...:rolleyes:
FWIW I'm more than happy with Linux and care little anymore what MS or Apple do...


Microsoft to businesses: Now is the time to switch to Vista

June 4, 2008 10:28 AM PDT

Posted by Mike Ricciuti


Microsoft has already made its case for consumer adoption of Vista. Now, it's aiming its PR offensive at business customers.

The company on Wednesday released a white paper paper targeted at the many businesses that have chosen to stick with Windows XP instead of moving to Vista. Microsoft argues that Vista is more secure, reliable, and can save companies money when it comes to management and deployment.

"We have tried to close gaps for consumers, and we're doing the same for enterprises," Mike Nash, vice president of Windows Client Product Management at Microsoft, told CNET News.com.

Why should businesses deploy now? Nash says the release of Vista Service Pack 1 has improved Windows security, improved driver support, and minimized application compatibility issues, for starters.

Compared with Windows XP, Vista has had fewer vulnerabilities (45 for Vista versus 56 for XP); fewer critical vulnerabilities (17 as opposed to 35); and 60 percent fewer malicious software infections than XP SP2, Nash said.

The big bonus for companies may come in cost savings versus XP when it comes to deployment and management of Vista across multiple machines, Nash said.

Tom Norton, the worldwide Microsoft services practice lead for Hewlett-Packard, said that a majority of HP's top 500 customers globally "are looking at this (Vista) as a way to save money on support of client environments."

As for application compatibility, the move from Internet Explorer 6 to Internet Explorer 7 was more traumatic than the Windows upgrade, said Norton.

Still, despite the statistics and reassurances, initial impressions tend to last. And the initial Vista experience for many people was less than stellar, a point which Microsoft concedes. Nash says that, yes, the company made a lot of changes with Vista that have taken time for customers to get used to, and initial driver and application support was lacking. But, "there is a huge gap between what is possible with Vista and the perception that is out there," he said.

Nash, who will soon celebrate his 17th anniversary with Microsoft, said that he has seen similar customer trepidation in the past when it comes to new Windows releases. "There has always been a version of Windows that is new that people don't know what to do with; there has always been the incumbent version; and there is always a new version on the horizon. It's not a new phenomenon," Nash said.

This time around, the X factor is Windows 7. Microsoft has said precious little about the planned Windows release, except that it will come in 2009 and will include a touch interface. Still, with companies just getting around to Vista deployment, does it make sense to wait for 7?

"I have heard that with every release (of Windows)," Nash said. "What I will say: back when I worked on security at Microsoft, a lot of customers said they would never deploy XP. Initially they were waiting for better security, then they were waiting for XP SP2. Then they were waiting for Longhorn (the code name used during Vista's development)."

Microsoft's message to customers is that Vista introduced a fair amount of new code in the operating system kernel and in device-level software. Sure, it's been a rough transition from XP to Vista. But Vista and Windows 7 will be largely compatible in those areas, according to the white paper release on Wednesday, meaning that customers will eventually need to bite the bullet and make the switch.

"There is always some level of evaluation that customers will want to go through. Five minutes for some; 12 to 18 months for others. The question is: what is the right time for you as a customer?" Nash said.
 
Last edited:

star_lord1

Member
Feb 18, 2008
209
5
18
WoodPeckr said:
...to stimulate lagging sales and get businesses to switch to Vista....before they do it ALL OVER AGAIN when they roll out Windows 7 next year!...:rolleyes:
FWIW I'm more than happy with Linux and care little anymore what MS or Apple do...


Microsoft to businesses: Now is the time to switch to Vista

June 4, 2008 10:28 AM PDT

Posted by Mike Ricciuti


Microsoft has already made its case for consumer adoption of Vista. Now, it's aiming its PR offensive at business customers.

The company on Wednesday released a white paper paper targeted at the many businesses that have chosen to stick with Windows XP instead of moving to Vista. Microsoft argues that Vista is more secure, reliable, and can save companies money when it comes to management and deployment.

"We have tried to close gaps for consumers, and we're doing the same for enterprises," Mike Nash, vice president of Windows Client Product Management at Microsoft, told CNET News.com.

Why should businesses deploy now? Nash says the release of Vista Service Pack 1 has improved Windows security, improved driver support, and minimized application compatibility issues, for starters.

Compared with Windows XP, Vista has had fewer vulnerabilities (45 for Vista versus 56 for XP); fewer critical vulnerabilities (17 as opposed to 35); and 60 percent fewer malicious software infections than XP SP2, Nash said.
It should be - they've had plenty of experience with fixing previous versions. So why upgrade from XP when it is now more secure and stable than when first released?
The big bonus for companies may come in cost savings versus XP when it comes to deployment and management of Vista across multiple machines, Nash said.

Tom Norton, the worldwide Microsoft services practice lead for Hewlett-Packard, said that a majority of HP's top 500 customers globally "are looking at this (Vista) as a way to save money on support of client environments."

As for application compatibility, the move from Internet Explorer 6 to Internet Explorer 7 was more traumatic than the Windows upgrade, said Norton.
Not for me, although IE 7 relocated a lot of the buttons which took some getting used to (and has not improved my experience).
Still, despite the statistics and reassurances, initial impressions tend to last. And the initial Vista experience for many people was less than stellar, a point which Microsoft concedes. Nash says that, yes, the company made a lot of changes with Vista that have taken time for customers to get used to, and initial driver and application support was lacking. But, "there is a huge gap between what is possible with Vista and the perception that is out there," he said.
True, there are applications I could never get to run with Vista which is why I ended up downgrading to XP on my new machine but I dual boot into Vista to play Halo 2 - the only use I have for Vista at this point!
I can fully understand GM and other companies NOT upgrading to the latest and greatest version of any software. Those machines that are dedicated whether on the shop floor (i.e. for manufacturing) or for dedicated utility purposes are better left as is - nothing is gained by upgrading and a good deal of time and money is spent in upgrading which is better used elsewhere.

If they're not on a public network then security is not an issue which is currently the bulk of the upgrades IMHO.

I found the User Access Control particularly galling and turned it off as soon as I could. Why couldn't MS have followed the Unix approach and provided a persistent login to super user for doing administrative tasks instead of requiring confirmation for each and every install and/or system change?
 
Toronto Escorts