Club Dynasty
Toronto Escorts

Global sea level rise on faster pace than expected

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Global sea level rise on faster pace than expected

Dr. Mario Picazo
Meteorologist, PhD

Wednesday, February 14, 2018, 11:26 -

A recent study based on 25 years of NASA and European satellite data shows how sea level rise on earth is increasing faster than originally thought. Water levels have been going up by accelerating incrementally in recent decades, rather than in the steady mode past studies had suggested.

Global warming and consequently the rapid ice melt occurring in both Greenland and Antarctica, are responsible for this acceleration. The research project that has brought light to this new finding is led by Steve Nerem, a professor of aerospace engineering science at the University of Colorado Boulder, fellow at the Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), and a member of NASA´s Sea Level Change team.

Professor Nerem's team suggests that with water levels rising at the accelerated rate seen, sea level rise projected for 2100 could be double compared to past projected scenarios that assumed a fairly constant rate increase.



Image courtesy of NASA. Global sea level rise since 1880 when records began.

Sea level could rise 26 inches by the year 2100
Sea level rise is caused by both the expansion of warming waters and the melting of continental ice sheets and glaciers. Of the 2.8 inch sea level rise measured during the past 25 years, 55% can be attributed to water expansion and the other 45% to melting ice. Satellite data used in this study also shows that more than three quarters of the acceleration since 1993 is a result of melting ice sheets in both Antarctica and Greenland.

The rate of sea level rise in the satellite era has risen from about 0.1 inch (2.5 millimeters) per year in the 1990s to about 0.13 inches (3.4 millimeters) per year today. But even with 25 years of data, detecting sea level rise acceleration is not an easy task. Climate variability can make it more challenging -- for example during a major volcanic eruption like Pinatubo in 1991 which decreased the global mean sea level, or with other phenomena like El Niño and La Niña in the Pacific, which can also cause global sea level fluctuation.

Nerem and his team have used different climate models to simulate the effects of major volcanic eruptions, as well as other datasets to determine the impact of El Niño and La Niña on sea level. This together with tide gauge data to assess potential errors in the altimeter estimate, has been key to come up with the underlying rate and acceleration of sea level rise over the last quarter century.



Satellite Data corrections

Past data shows that sea levels had been stable for about 3,000 years until the 20th century, then they began to rise as a result of global warming caused by an increase in the burning of fossil fuels. "Our results are almost certainly a conservative estimate," Nerem said. "The extrapolation used assumes that sea level continues to change in the future as it has over the last 25 years. Given the large changes we are seeing in the ice sheets today, that's not likely."

"If sea levels do rise another two feet by the end of the century the effects would be quite noticeable in cities like Miami or New Orleans, But I don't I don´t still view that as catastrophic" because those cities can survive at great expense added Nerem.

In 2018, NASA will launch two new satellite missions that will be critical to improving future sea level projections: the Gravity Recovery and Climate (GRACE-FO), will continue measurements of the mass of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets; while the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) will make highly accurate observations of the elevation of ice sheets and glaciers.

https://www.theweathernetwork.com/us/news/articles/extreme-weather/global-sea-level-rise-us-flood-rain-nasa-el-nino-la-nina-pacific-climate-melting-ice-greenland-fossil-fuel/95694
 

Terminator2000

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
3,396
108
63
Global sea level rise on faster pace than expected

Dr. Mario Picazo
Meteorologist, PhD

Wednesday, February 14, 2018, 11:26 -

A recent study based on 25 years of NASA and European satellite data shows how sea level rise on earth is increasing faster than originally thought. Water levels have been going up by accelerating incrementally in recent decades, rather than in the steady mode past studies had suggested.

Global warming and consequently the rapid ice melt occurring in both Greenland and Antarctica, are responsible for this acceleration. The research project that has brought light to this new finding is led by Steve Nerem, a professor of aerospace engineering science at the University of Colorado Boulder, fellow at the Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), and a member of NASA´s Sea Level Change team.

Professor Nerem's team suggests that with water levels rising at the accelerated rate seen, sea level rise projected for 2100 could be double compared to past projected scenarios that assumed a fairly constant rate increase.



Image courtesy of NASA. Global sea level rise since 1880 when records began.

Sea level could rise 26 inches by the year 2100
Sea level rise is caused by both the expansion of warming waters and the melting of continental ice sheets and glaciers. Of the 2.8 inch sea level rise measured during the past 25 years, 55% can be attributed to water expansion and the other 45% to melting ice. Satellite data used in this study also shows that more than three quarters of the acceleration since 1993 is a result of melting ice sheets in both Antarctica and Greenland.

The rate of sea level rise in the satellite era has risen from about 0.1 inch (2.5 millimeters) per year in the 1990s to about 0.13 inches (3.4 millimeters) per year today. But even with 25 years of data, detecting sea level rise acceleration is not an easy task. Climate variability can make it more challenging -- for example during a major volcanic eruption like Pinatubo in 1991 which decreased the global mean sea level, or with other phenomena like El Niño and La Niña in the Pacific, which can also cause global sea level fluctuation.

Nerem and his team have used different climate models to simulate the effects of major volcanic eruptions, as well as other datasets to determine the impact of El Niño and La Niña on sea level. This together with tide gauge data to assess potential errors in the altimeter estimate, has been key to come up with the underlying rate and acceleration of sea level rise over the last quarter century.



Satellite Data corrections

Past data shows that sea levels had been stable for about 3,000 years until the 20th century, then they began to rise as a result of global warming caused by an increase in the burning of fossil fuels. "Our results are almost certainly a conservative estimate," Nerem said. "The extrapolation used assumes that sea level continues to change in the future as it has over the last 25 years. Given the large changes we are seeing in the ice sheets today, that's not likely."

"If sea levels do rise another two feet by the end of the century the effects would be quite noticeable in cities like Miami or New Orleans, But I don't I don´t still view that as catastrophic" because those cities can survive at great expense added Nerem.

In 2018, NASA will launch two new satellite missions that will be critical to improving future sea level projections: the Gravity Recovery and Climate (GRACE-FO), will continue measurements of the mass of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets; while the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) will make highly accurate observations of the elevation of ice sheets and glaciers.

https://www.theweathernetwork.com/us/news/articles/extreme-weather/global-sea-level-rise-us-flood-rain-nasa-el-nino-la-nina-pacific-climate-melting-ice-greenland-fossil-fuel/95694
you have to be highly skeptical of NASA nowadays and any and all announced plans they make. launching satellites to measure antarctica and greenland. did they really land on the moon?
 

Jiffypop69

Active member
Jul 7, 2009
1,474
0
36
you have to be highly skeptical of NASA nowadays and any and all announced plans they make. launching satellites to measure antarctica and greenland. did they really land on the moon?
While I reserve everyone's rights to be skeptical, the moon landings have been proven real several times. Not JUST by NASA, but by several space agencies including China, and Russia's.
I get that some will never believe it though.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,516
2,718
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The Pacific nation of Tuvalu -- long seen as a prime candidate to disappear as climate change forces up sea levels -- is actually growing in size, new research shows.

A University of Auckland study examined changes in the geography of Tuvalu's nine atolls and 101 reef islands between 1971 and 2014, using aerial photographs and satellite imagery.

It found eight of the atolls and almost three-quarters of the islands grew during the study period, lifting Tuvalu's total land area by 2.9 percent, even though sea levels in the country rose at twice the global average.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ation-getting-bigger-study.html#ixzz57fQuOia1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
OMG! Did you even read the article you cut-and-paste??

The article confirms that sea levels are rising in Tuvalu:
- "sea levels in the country rose at twice the global average"
- "It found factors such as wave patterns and sediment dumped by storms could offset the erosion caused by rising water levels"
- "The Auckland team says climate change remains one of the major threats to low-lying island nations. But it argues the study should prompt a rethink on how such countries respond to the problem."

Although the islands are indeed growing in size, it's not habitable land (it's washed-up sediment) and part of the "adapting" is to move people to the larger more stable islands.
 

Promo

Active member
Jan 10, 2009
2,480
0
36
you have to be highly skeptical of NASA nowadays and any and all announced plans they make. launching satellites to measure antarctica and greenland. did they really land on the moon?
Viewing any information with a critical eye is always a good idea. Best to fact check and assign a mental reliability score for the source to be used to judge future information.

Collecting and providing data is one thing. Analyzing and presenting the data is another. Third is understanding everything end-to-end. Stats can be twisted to say anything based on the presenter's biases.

I'm not buying into Trump's and the alt-right's MSM, FBI, NASA, CIA are all biased and producers of fake information bullsh*t. Trump is a proven chronic liar long before he got into politics, it 's only got worse. Stone, Bannon, Breitbart, Alex Jones, Mark Dice, etc. are among the alt-righters that propagate hate and lies for personal gain (meaning money!)

Yes, man landed on the moon. Yes man and satellites can survive the Van-Allen Radiation Belt. No, the Earth is not flat and it's not contained in a fishbowl on a turtle's back in a hologram universe.
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
OMG! Did you even read the article you cut-and-paste??

The article confirms that sea levels are rising in Tuvalu:
- "sea levels in the country rose at twice the global average"
- "It found factors such as wave patterns and sediment dumped by storms could offset the erosion caused by rising water levels"
- "The Auckland team says climate change remains one of the major threats to low-lying island nations. But it argues the study should prompt a rethink on how such countries respond to the problem."

Although the islands are indeed growing in size, it's not habitable land (it's washed-up sediment) and part of the "adapting" is to move people to the larger more stable islands.
LOL
The dude most likely doesn't understand what's being said.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts