Gay Marriage
- Thread starter Goober Mcfly
- Start date
Just b/c I disagree with McFly on many issues in regards to religion, abortion and same sex marriages.....It doesn't mean I don't respect his opinion.
McFly's experiences differ from mine....therefore it's only natural his ideas would differ
Now if I found out he looked down upon somebody b/c of their gender, race, physical appearance, class and sexual orientation....then I guess I would no longer respect his opinion.
McFly's experiences differ from mine....therefore it's only natural his ideas would differ
Now if I found out he looked down upon somebody b/c of their gender, race, physical appearance, class and sexual orientation....then I guess I would no longer respect his opinion.
Y
yychobbyist
Goober, the Supreme Court of Canada said that churches have the right to decide for themselves which couples they will marry and which they may not. Therefore, no one will ever force churches to marry homosexuals.
I also find it interesting that you ask for lucid non-flaming threats while at the same time being the one to bring up my name in the context of beastiality. I will point out to you for, oh , the seven hundred and eighth time that what I did to that cow is a medically approved procedure and NOT bestiality. Though I did sport wood while and after doing it.
I also find it interesting that you ask for lucid non-flaming threats while at the same time being the one to bring up my name in the context of beastiality. I will point out to you for, oh , the seven hundred and eighth time that what I did to that cow is a medically approved procedure and NOT bestiality. Though I did sport wood while and after doing it.
[font="]Sorry, that was me yyc. I used you to make a point; the obvious being you are a profoundly unusual thesaurus memorizing redneck who has a rather specific fetish.yychobbyist said:
[/font]
mehyychobbyist said:
Moral Relativism. Farking Liberal.
I rest my case.yychobbyist said:
With regard to the current topic I say give them what they want, call it what they want; Their rights aren't any different than mine.
A topic that I haven't seen discussed here and something that I struggle with is whether or not they should be able to adopt and raise children?
Your thoughts...I'll back with my 2 cents later.
A topic that I haven't seen discussed here and something that I struggle with is whether or not they should be able to adopt and raise children?
Your thoughts...I'll back with my 2 cents later.
Down with the institution
I'm for total equality. But to me it's a step in the wrong direction. I don't believe any marriages should constitute a contract or have any standing in law.
A marriage should be the personal lifestyle choice of two or more people according to their own values & beliefs. Any religious institution should free to perform or reject any mariage as it sees fit. But for the purposes of the state and the law, there is no such thing as marital status - only paternity. Otherwise everyone is just a SIN number.
As for benefits and legal next-of-kin rights are concerned, each individual should be responsible for naming one co-beneficiary, a power of attorney and / or executor - it can be the person they chose to wed, or somebody else. They can change this person once every 5 years.
Until this is law, I would never get married or live in an arrangement which might constitute a commn-law marriage.
I'm for total equality. But to me it's a step in the wrong direction. I don't believe any marriages should constitute a contract or have any standing in law.
A marriage should be the personal lifestyle choice of two or more people according to their own values & beliefs. Any religious institution should free to perform or reject any mariage as it sees fit. But for the purposes of the state and the law, there is no such thing as marital status - only paternity. Otherwise everyone is just a SIN number.
As for benefits and legal next-of-kin rights are concerned, each individual should be responsible for naming one co-beneficiary, a power of attorney and / or executor - it can be the person they chose to wed, or somebody else. They can change this person once every 5 years.
Until this is law, I would never get married or live in an arrangement which might constitute a commn-law marriage.
Last edited:
If that happens the only way I'll ever get to be involved in a threesome would be to come back as a Double A battery.
Fark!
Fark!
Think of it this way
If legalizing gay marriage leads to further acceptance of gays anf their relationships down the road, it will have real benefits for everyone. I was stunned to learn how common it still is for young people who are 100% homo to be married and live straight by day. Most of these types find outlets for their desires in binges of ultra-high risk sex.
Whatever can be done to reduce the preassure to live in the closet will in turn lead to fewer ruined lives for these families when the charade can no longer be maintained, not to mention reducing the spillover effect of problems in one community to another.
If legalizing gay marriage leads to further acceptance of gays anf their relationships down the road, it will have real benefits for everyone. I was stunned to learn how common it still is for young people who are 100% homo to be married and live straight by day. Most of these types find outlets for their desires in binges of ultra-high risk sex.
Whatever can be done to reduce the preassure to live in the closet will in turn lead to fewer ruined lives for these families when the charade can no longer be maintained, not to mention reducing the spillover effect of problems in one community to another.
