it seems both sides of the argument are out in force.
The sick day bank stops at 180 days which can be sold back to the city at retirement, it is a 250 million dollar liabilty to the taxpayers of the city and quite frankly is an out of date perk that needs to go, it dates from before the days of short term disability insurance, which I muight add is widely available these days . It is provided by insurance companies who require proof of illness or off work injury which the union does not want that old accountability thing again.
Toronto city council screwed themselves by giving the firefighters a 3% increase in secret negotiations last year, the outside workers now want that or to keep the sick bank, I think they are in for a rough ride if the city holds firm and the strike goes on Hizz Worshippp the mayor looses all that union support when he runs again, but he cann't just give them everything they want either the voters won't stand for that , the taxes might have to go up to the level of reality.
The councilors showed no shame about taking the cost of living increase this year in spite of warnings from some councilors and some people on this board as i recall, that fluttering sound of the hens coming home to roost......
Several years ago the outside workers got employment for life in their contract, they can not be laid off and firing one is so difficult the managment does not even try unless they get arrested on city time, they have the most lucrative contract in history and they are wondering why the taxpayers who are out of work and cutting back have no sympathy for them.