Game Changer?

escortsxxx

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2004
3,541
960
113
Tdot
It may be a game changer 2 or 3 centuries away in the future.

What the world needs to save itself from the impending energy crunch
is not any game changer but to implement an old and proven solution.
Unless we expedite construction of conventional nuclear reactors on
a massive scale be prepared for the unpleasant alternative solution
that is trimming world's population by half by the end of this century.
Lol 300 years. so 1700 introduces the wood stove and we re just now learning to use it and steam power is still science fiction. 1932 we split tje atom and maybe in 2200 we might have our first nuclear bomb and maybe our first reactor at pickering... or gps 1974 1o years for military use 20 for real world use and now everyone has one is 100 years away...

yes the vid phone was invented 50 years ago and it took smart phones to have it catch on since no one saw any use for it... but free power free gas ...not free but so good cheap to be on par with tap water? it might be the wong decision but going to fast vs too slow is more likely
 

escortsxxx

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2004
3,541
960
113
Tdot

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,844
2,893
113
Ghawar
Lol 300 years. so 1700 introduces the wood stove and we re just now learning to use it and steam power is still science fiction. 1932 we split tje atom and maybe in 2200 we might have our first nuclear bomb and maybe our first reactor at pickering... or gps 1974 1o years for military use 20 for real world use and now everyone has one is 100 years away...

yes the vid phone was invented 50 years ago and it took smart phones to have it catch on since no one saw any use for it... but free power free gas ...not free but so good cheap to be on par with tap water? it might be the wong decision but going to fast vs too slow is more likely
If there is ever any chance of commercialization of this discovery
you would very soon read about new developments like duplication
of the reported fusion process and private investment funds pouring
into further development. Remember the cold fusion discovery of
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann?
 

escortsxxx

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2004
3,541
960
113
Tdot
If there is ever any chance of commercialization of this discovery
you would very soon read about new developments like duplication
of the reported fusion process and private investment funds pouring
into further development. Remember the cold fusion discovery of
Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann?
Sure it could be mars life all over again

 

escortsxxx

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2004
3,541
960
113
Tdot
Is fusion power a game-changer? Yes

Is this step a game-changer? No

Is this step progress? Yes

How far away is workable fusion power? Who the fuck knows?!

It is a game changer but its like the 2 seconds of Edison light bulb or the few minutes of flight the Wright brothers manged. Its an important thereshold like breaking the 4 minute mile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boss Nass

anonemouse

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2002
946
354
63
Toronto
From the BBC…

“although the experiment got more energy out than the laser put in, this did not include the energy needed to make the lasers work - which was far greater that the amount of energy the hydrogen produced.”
Came to mention this. It's a good step for sure. With this announcement fusion is only 10 years away, which is a good step forward from the last announcement 10 years ago when fusion was only 12 years away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: escortsxxx

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,851
1,611
113
Maybe time to sell your oil stocks?
You can! Also you can convince all the lefties to sell their oil stock too. I definitely will hold on to mine!


It may be a game changer 2 or 3 centuries away in the future.

What the world needs to save itself from the impending energy crunch
is not any game changer but to implement an old and proven solution.
Unless we expedite construction of conventional nuclear reactors on
a massive scale be prepared for the unpleasant alternative solution
that is trimming world's population by half by the end of this century.
On that front, the US officially announced their nuclear fusion discovery yesterday, saying it would transform *US* industry and *US* national security (yes, this is geopolitical and geoeconomic); then adding we are decades ( minimum 1 centuries) away from commercial application; and the lasers used to generate fusion power delivered ~2 megajoules of energy to create ~3 megajoules… but it took ~300 megajoules to power the lasers(!) That’s akin to feeling morally superior driving an EV if it’s powered by a battery made of minerals dug up by child labour and charged with electricity produced by burning coal; or basing energy grids on fluctuating power sources such as wind and wave when they need stable power to match supply and demand; or relying on solar power in countries with peak energy loads in the depths of winter.

You looking at least 1 centuries in the future! It all a good feel story for the general public! It provided hope for the futuRe maybe in 1 century from now!
 
Last edited:

dirtydaveiii

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2018
8,333
6,127
113
Small modular nuclear reactors are the way to go to replace fossil fuel dependency.

Problem is that the radical leftist activist crowd is stalwart to their unattainable ideology of wind and solar.

But then again they really don't care for the poorest of the planet. That's just a facade.
So you changed your mind from coal ?
 

escortsxxx

Well-known member
Jul 15, 2004
3,541
960
113
Tdot
So you changed your mind from coal ?

Coal good for chicken



We’ve seen this coming. We’ve been moving in this direction incrementally,” said Mike Donaldson, a vice president at the fusion development company General Fusion. “So I don’t think this actually takes any years off the timeline.”

The fusion industry has estimated that deployment of nuclear fusion projects would begin in the early 2030s, although the industry does not necessarily have a history of sticking to its timelines. In 2012, the National Ignition Facility’s director predicted that fusion technology would be commercially viable in 10 years, meaning about now.

Donaldson emphasized that the lab’s work is significant in proving the core science is sound. But he said developers will need to prove the next step: “What is really up to us right now is to build on this to produce practical electricity-producing machines.”

Any results that DOE presents will need to be repeatable to be considered scientifically, said Ed Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists. Questions also remain on how safe fusion reactors would be, given that tritium, one of the main fuels in fusion reactors, is radioactive and the fusion process itself produces dangerous amounts of heat and pressure, Lyman said.

“Not to downplay things if they’ve actually done it, but just take it with a big grain of salt,” Lyman said. “It will be more than a little late for achieving decarbonization. We really need to do that in the next decade or two, and even the most optimistic estimates wouldn’t have fusion power until the 2040s.”
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts