Fujisms

[blackrock13]

Just had to pass this one on for all to read

From the Father Brands Son thread.

Originally Posted by fuji


I'm not a fan of branding, tattoos, or piercings. However lots of people are. George W. Bush bent over and got himself a brand, for example. It was a standard part of the initiation into his fraternity at Yale to get a triangle branded on the small of his back.

We feed cows. We feed people. We brand cows. We brand people. Are you now against feeding people too? The only real difference is that we brand cows whether they like it or not, but it's only acceptable to brand a person who consents.

The only thing unclear about the case in post #1 is to what extent a child, even with the consent of their parents, can consent to branding. They can consent to a lot of things, it's not clear branding is well over the line--things like piercings for example are similar in every medical sense. Branding is just a bit more painful, though not as painful as you probably think it is. Enough more to make a difference? It's hard to say.


I left the whole post so as not to be accused of cherry picking. I had to stop three times from laughing so hard.

Do any of you have favorites?

 

[eurotrash1970]

I read this again after I saw the post and I had to stop reading at least 3 times because I was laughing so hard I was crying.

 

[Aardvark154]

"We feed cows. We feed people. We brand cows. We brand people. Are you now against feeding people too? The only real difference is that we brand cows whether they like it or not, but it's only acceptable to brand a person who consents."

Hmm, we also cut notches into and part of the ears off of cattle. sheep, swine etc. . . So to you think the police - Crown are going to take an hey, live and let live approach to - but they gave their permission for me to cut off their ear.

 

[toguy5252]

Not sure that TERB has enough bandwidth. Not sure where to begin but it would have to be in relation to the father branding his children:

[QUOTEWhat makes me somewhat sympathetic is that he branded himself first,[/QUOTE]

Makes me laugh just seeing it again.

 

[blackrock13]

From the cheating thread;

Only 4 pages and 52 posts long.


'No, I don't think that. I think a different set of rules apply to sexual cheating, always have, and always will. It is part of the human condition. If you look at the behavior of the upper classes they routinely cheat on their wives sexually, but they do NOT for the most part commit crimes. It's just a fact.'

'It is likely in recognition of this fact that sexual cheating is not subject to any legal penalties.'


'Well no that's not quite what I'm saying. Everybody cheats. What makes you classy is doing it discretely. This guy was anything but discrete, he was a cad.'


'OK, you are technically correct (the very best kind of correct). Not everybody cheats, just a lot of people. My point in that case was actually that a lot of people from all walks of life cheat. What separates high and low class people is not that they cheat, but the way they do it.

'Not always, sometimes it is a matter of fact. For example, it's a fact that the term "high class" finds its etymology in a reference to the upper classes, in the sense of holding them out as models to be emulated.'

'Yes, people want to pick and choose what aspects of upper class behavior should be emulated: dress, speech, manners, style, and so on, are commonly included. My inclusion of "cheating" in that list is controversial, but it is not wrong. It is a behavior of the upper classes, of high class individuals, that is routinely depicted in our films and our literature, and ubiquitous in real life. It is also the case that the upper classes expect such cheating to be done discretely.'

'Yes, it's controversial, but the controversy arises from hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy needs to be exposed for what it is.'

'I predict that those who are so offended at the notion that "high class" behavior includes a discrete mistress will turn out to be deeply conflicted individuals who have not come to proper terms with their own conflicting desires.'

.....and short, but a doozie;

I have been pretty good at fessing up when I'm wrong, CG.

 

[fuji]

Hmm, we also cut notches into and part of the ears off of cattle. sheep, swine etc. . . So to you think the police - Crown are going to take an hey, live and let live approach to - but they gave their permission for me to cut off their ear.

So you think that human branding is illegal for adults, that they cannot consent to it? What do you say to all the people who do it then, like George W. Bush?

The reality is that your objection to consensual human branding in adults has no legal basis and no practical or moral basis. You're just old fuddy duddies who don't appreciate body modification.

 

[fuji]

'No, I don't think that. I think a different set of rules apply to sexual cheating, always have, and always will. It is part of the human condition. If you look at the behavior of the upper classes they routinely cheat on their wives sexually, but they do NOT for the most part commit crimes. It's just a fact.'

'It is likely in recognition of this fact that sexual cheating is not subject to any legal penalties.'


'Well no that's not quite what I'm saying. Everybody cheats. What makes you classy is doing it discretely. This guy was anything but discrete, he was a cad.'


'OK, you are technically correct (the very best kind of correct). Not everybody cheats, just a lot of people. My point in that case was actually that a lot of people from all walks of life cheat. What separates high and low class people is not that they cheat, but the way they do it.

'Not always, sometimes it is a matter of fact. For example, it's a fact that the term "high class" finds its etymology in a reference to the upper classes, in the sense of holding them out as models to be emulated.'

'Yes, people want to pick and choose what aspects of upper class behavior should be emulated: dress, speech, manners, style, and so on, are commonly included. My inclusion of "cheating" in that list is controversial, but it is not wrong. It is a behavior of the upper classes, of high class individuals, that is routinely depicted in our films and our literature, and ubiquitous in real life. It is also the case that the upper classes expect such cheating to be done discretely.'

'Yes, it's controversial, but the controversy arises from hypocrisy, and that hypocrisy needs to be exposed for what it is.'

'I predict that those who are so offended at the notion that "high class" behavior includes a discrete mistress will turn out to be deeply conflicted individuals who have not come to proper terms with their own conflicting desires.'

.....and short, but a doozie;

I have been pretty good at fessing up when I'm wrong, CG.

I stand by all that. Absolutely.

And yes, I will let you know when I'm wrong. Unlike you I'm intellectually honest, and if I'm wrong, I fess up to it. You, on the other hand, switch to insults when you lose a point. You have no class when it comes to debating, and probably none when it comes to cheating either.

You will noticed I fessed up to being wrong in one of your quotes when I agreed that "everybody cheats" took it too far. Did you not catch that? I said OK you're technically correct. That is called being honest and acknowledging a statement was not correct-something you could learn a little about.

 

[blackrock13]

So you think that human branding is illegal for adults, that they cannot consent to it? What do you say to all the people who do it then, like George W. Bush?

The reality is that your objection to consensual human branding in adults has no legal basis and no practical or moral basis. You're just old fuddy duddies who don't appreciate body modification.

HaHaHaHa!!! Wrong thread, duffus. See everyone does once in a while, no biggie.

Thanks for coming out.

 

[blackrock13]

From 'Fucking Best Friends Wife' thread;

'The same argument for cheating generally fails: "I wouldn't want my wife to cheat on me, so I won't cheat on her", but in reality lots of people do it, and yes, they'd all be hopping mad if their wife cheated on them. Me too.

So I don't see this as much different.

I'd be pissed off like no tomorrow if my best friend fucked my wife, at both her, and him. But I'd fuck my best friends wife, and sleep well at night.

When it comes to sex we're hardwired to be hypocrits.'

 

[Cycleguy007]

I'm still LMAO with regards to Fuji's definition of "classy"...

 

[blackrock13]

From Fucking best friends wife;

Friends are a dime a dozen. Sex makes the world go round. Anyway, he's never going to find out, so you get the best of both worlds!

'My conscience is fine with this one. I am OK with the fact that we are deeply conflicted over sex, it's just life. Same way we all want to cheat on our SO's but we are fucking outraged if our SO cheats on us. This conflict is part of being human so enjoy it.

I realize this is one of those things that sets me apart from most people.'

'You would be wrong. You may not agree with my morals, but I live and die by them. A trustier friend no-one will ever find, nor more honest in business dealings, nor more reliable. Really. It is a point of pride, a matter of principle, for me.'


'So we come to the moral rule against adultery. Does it serve us as well as all the others? Sort of. It certainly limits social upheaval in the face of betrayal within family units. On the other hand, it runs completely contrary to the purpose of our lives, it opposes seduction, opposes reproduction, and therefore opposes creation itself, arguably, it is in opposition to humanity.

Not only are we as individuals directly incented to seduce and reproduce as much as we can afford to, but society itself is created by that act as well. The logical extension of morality into adultry hits an inflection point where it becomes an empty construct that is fundamentally in opposition to itself. Nietzche hit this point in "The Birth of Tragedy" and "Geneaology of Morals" where he noted that logic and rationality could turn in on itself and become anti-life.'

- - -

'I would also directly counter the TQM comment: I have had "Womanizing Slimeball" under my name for some three years now for a reason, ditto the signature, "going to hell in a handmaiden". This is not a notion I came up with when I opened this thread!! I have had mistresses, girlfriends, used SP's, all while married, and I have been the other guy in more than one relationship.

I have not actually fucked my best friends wife, but I have contemplated it, hence this topic, i certainly don't have a moral problem with it, I think that's tantamount to saying you have a moral problem with humanity.'

The last word on this BF Wife thread goes to Sheik;

'You know Fuji..... I said it before and I'm saying it again, you're a bloody idiot.

This thread is pointless and guess what, its considered trolling....

CLOSED'

 

[Berlin]

I can see why the disagreement in the other threads. This one is a bit...


... too personal don't you think ?

 

[WoodPeckr]

Dumb thread!

Seems like the OP has too much time on his hands.....

 

[fuji]

From Fucking best friends wife;

Friends are a dime a dozen. Sex makes the world go round. Anyway, he's never going to find out, so you get the best of both worlds!

So long as you note that this one is a hypothetical, the premise of that thread was 100% certainty of discretion. In reality that's unlikely.

 

[fuji]

I can see why the disagreement in the other threads. This one is a bit...


... too personal don't you think ?

What I suggest is that we keep this thread, and Blackrock paost all of his inane and childish ad hominems here, so that the other threads can go ahead with only the reasonable people posting. Blackrock of course would be welcome to post to other threads from time to time too, if he actually ever had a real point to contribute, which he very rarely does actually have.

So blackrock, this is now your thread--this is your place to post all your ad hominems, ok? All yours. Just keep them off the other threads.

 

[Aardvark154]

So you think that human branding is illegal for adults, that they cannot consent to it? What do you say to all the people who do it then, like George W. Bush?

May I suggest that some reading on the topic of hazing and consent is in order.

The reality is that your objection to consensual human branding in adults has no legal basis and no practical or moral basis. You're just old fuddy duddies who don't appreciate body modification.

To quote Star Trek: "Fascinating Captain, simply fascinating."

 

[JohnLarue]

Unlike you I'm intellectually honest, and if I'm wrong, I fess up to it. .

I do not think so!
You have been wrong so many times I have lost count, yet, I have yet to observe you fess up to anything.
In fact, you tend to slide down the slippery slope with unrealistic "hypothetical" to justify your hair-brained ideas.

Bye the way, are you still trying to bang your Buddy's wife and still looking him straight in the eye when you call him a friend?

Are you still intent on government sponsored production of unwanted bastard kids by welfare Moms ?

Are you still convinced the Canadian Oil & Gas Industry should be taxed to zero profitability to fund your sovereign fund?

Do you still feel the average Chinese driver is a "Highly Skilled" driver?

Do you still feel China should be free to increase its pollution levels while the West must cut back, despite clear evidence the absolute world level of pollution will increase under your Per-Capita plan?

Each and everyone of these is ill-conceived, yet you did not back down on any of them.
Your claim you fess up when wrong is just another shovel full of bull-shit.

 

[blackrock13]

Seems like the OP has too much time on his hands.....

What time? It took me less than 60 minutes total to research and post. Then I walked away and came back. What, are you afraid you're next. Not likely. You 're fridge magnet comments are irritating, but nowhere near as off the plantation as Fuji's. He actually thinks he's excessively intellectual. You've never made any such claim to my recollection.

 

[blackrock13]

I can see why the disagreement in the other threads. This one is a bit...


... too personal don't you think ?

Well, you could also look at it as a review of what is print on Terb, by Fuji, about Fuji, and thanks to Fuji. You could also say it's simply a retrospective of some of his memorable moments.

 

[Brill]

This blackrock13 dude sure gets wound up - 7,000 posts in a year and half of them are the same thing over and over and over again.