Release her and let Trump piss off... he'll be gone soon anywaysend her below the 49th parallel and let her plead Her case before her accusers. As far as PM Justine is concerned, he should stick to his slumber parties.
Release her and let Trump piss off... he'll be gone soon anywaysend her below the 49th parallel and let her plead Her case before her accusers. As far as PM Justine is concerned, he should stick to his slumber parties.
Ask Trump what he wants.Release her and let Trump piss off... he'll be gone soon anyway
Except they just openly admitted that the two Canadians are being held as a tit for tat. Their girl is being held hostage by a third party. Canada. As somebody else pointed out. We are doing America's dirty work. Trudeau's pontificating that we can't start a precedent by caving doesn't really hold water. Quit holding their citizens hostage at the bidding of the U.S. and we shouldn't really run into this problem often. Many respected Canadians signed a letter asking him to do the right thing, because they see the bullshit. He apparently can't and thinks he is showing strength. He's not.For once , Trudeau is doing the right thing. But he should've accelerated the process long time ago and extradite Meng asap. The Chinese are adamant that the Michael's are not connected to Meng, so no point releasing her.
It was a gigantic fuckup from the beginning. I blame it on Freeland (and Trudeau)Except they just openly admitted that the two Canadians are being held as a tit for tat. Their girl is being held hostage by a third party. Canada. As somebody else pointed out. We are doing America's dirty work. Trudeau's pontificating that we can't start a precedent by caving doesn't really hold water. Quit holding their citizens hostage at the bidding of the U.S. and we shouldn't really run into this problem often. Many respected Canadians signed a letter asking him to do the right thing, because they see the bullshit. He apparently can't and thinks he is showing strength. He's not.
What an idiot. There is no request or need for negotiations. Just let her travel back to China. USA can ask China for extradition.gTrudeau is right to reject call to swap Meng Wanzhou for the ‘Two Michaels’
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has emphatically rejected a call by several prominent Canadians to politically intervene to end the extradition proceedings against Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou and send her home to China in exchange for the freedom of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.
To do so would “imperil thousands of Canadians travelling in China and around the world,” Trudeau said.
“The bigger question is whether or not we want China or other countries to get the message that all they have to do to get leverage over the Canadian government is randomly arrest a couple of Canadians,” Trudeau said, his face showing some irritation at the mention of the petition.
It was in Mindanao April 2016 that Robert Hall and John Ridsdel were beheaded after Trudeau stated that Canada would never negotiate with those who seized Canadians as hostages.
Trudeau is right to reject call to swap Meng Wanzhou for the ‘Two Michaels’
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has emphatically rejected a call by several prominent Canadians to politically intervene to end the extradition proceedings against Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou and send her home to China in exchange for the freedom of Canadians Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.
To do so would “imperil thousands of Canadians travelling in China and around the world,” Trudeau said.
“The bigger question is whether or not we want China or other countries to get the message that all they have to do to get leverage over the Canadian government is randomly arrest a couple of Canadians,” Trudeau said, his face showing some irritation at the mention of the petition.
It was in Mindanao April 2016 that Robert Hall and John Ridsdel were beheaded after Trudeau stated that Canada would never negotiate with those who seized Canadians as hostages.
Canada has an extradition treaty with the US.What an idiot. There is no request or need for negotiations. Just let her travel back to China. USA can ask China for extradition.g
Likewise, I assume you believe that, if the charges against the two Canadians held in China are baseless, they will surely be exposed.Canada has an extradition treaty with the US.
If the charges against Meng are baseless, she should go to the US and expose them.
That is an idiotic assumption as it presumes that you think China`s justice system is independent and just.Likewise, I assume you believe that, if the charges against the two Canadians held in China are baseless, they will surely be exposed.
What an idiot. There is no request or need for negotiations. Just let her travel back to China. USA can ask China for extradition.g
Except they just openly admitted that the two Canadians are being held as a tit for tat. Their girl is being held hostage by a third party. Canada. As somebody else pointed out. We are doing America's dirty work. Trudeau's pontificating that we can't start a precedent by caving doesn't really hold water. Quit holding their citizens hostage at the bidding of the U.S. and we shouldn't really run into this problem often. Many respected Canadians signed a letter asking him to do the right thing, because they see the bullshit. He apparently can't and thinks he is showing strength. He's not.
1. I think it is extremely stupid to not go for the prisoner exchange. People who oppose the prisoner exchange are still in high school. They have no concept of what the real world is like.
2. What I really want to say, is no one talks about the irony of this anywhere.
Just like what you said, the United States under President Trump, will never receive their prisoner in Meng Wanzhou unless they invade Canada and take her.
If Trump loses this election, he never gets his prisoner.
If Trump wins the election, all the appeals by the high priced lawyers will ensure he will never receive his prisoner by the end of his term. Unless Trump pulls a Putin and appoints himself president for life, then he has a chance to receive his prisoner.
So why is Canada doing this?
The only conclusion we have is that Canada is not lead by serious people. Just jokers in high school who never seen the real world.
?
It is not a lawful arrest, if the charges are bogus. It is not China's fault that US telecommunication companies have fallen behind Huawei.Canada is NOT holding anyone hostage. To compare a lawful arrest under international treaties to what the Chinese are doing is misguided and completely misses the point of what is happening here.
That’s why they are having the extradition hearing instead of just arresting her and immediately sending her to the US.It is not a lawful arrest, if the charges are bogus. It is not China's fault that US telecommunication companies have fallen behind Huawei.
Actually, in the future we will be seeing China overtake USA in many areas of technology.
So, you think it is a crime in Canada for a Chinese company to do business in other country, just because the USA president has sanctioned that country.That’s why they are having the extradition hearing instead of just arresting her and immediately sending her to the US.
The Canadian authorities believe she violated the law. A court will determine if this is so which, by all appearances, appears to be the case. The process is lawful...unlike what tgd
So...if people want to call this a hostage situation by Canada then every person who has ever been arrested by the police was taken “hostage”.
I honestly do not understand what is so difficult for people to grasp about this.
It doesn’t matter what I think...but the judge thinks so:So, you think it is a crime in Canada for a Chinese company to do business in other country, just because the USA president has sanctioned that country.
That is the basis for the arrest.
Any other minister but the idiot Freedland would have been smart enough to avoid this spectacle by giving Meng a hint to take another route to avoid Canada.
It is a Kangaroo court ruling. And you complain about Chinese justice. The key to the charges against Meng is Huawei trading with Iran in conflict with USA sanctions. You can dress up that charge any way you want.It doesn’t matter what I think...but the judge thinks so:
Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes of the B.C. Supreme Court ruled that a key legal test to extradite had been met: that the criminal conduct alleged by the United States must also be considered criminal in Canada. The U.S. alleges the Chinese executive lied to HSBC about Huawei’s business in Iran, which put a U.S. subsidiary of the global bank at risk of running afoul of sanctions on Iran.![]()
Canada braces for economic retaliation from China following Meng Wanzhou court ruling
Ottawa sought to assure China that the court’s decision was a product of Canada’s legal system and out of its handswww.theglobeandmail.com
Ms. Meng’s lawyers had argued that because Canada dropped its own sanctions against Iran in 2016, Ms. Meng’s actions would not be illegal here. But Justice Holmes said “the essence of the alleged wrongful conduct in this case is the making of intentionally false statements," or fraud, which is a crime in both countries.
It is NOT a kangaroo court. It is entirely legal and completely appropriate. You can disagree with the judge’s decision if you like...you can disagree with the decision to arrest Weng....but there is NOTHING illegal or improper about Canada’s actions.It is a Kangaroo court ruling. And you complain about Chinese justice. The key to the charges against Meng is Huawei trading with Iran in conflict with USA sanctions. You can dress up that charge any way you want.