Forgotten child dies in hot car

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
9,458
9,596
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Many times when I get home with some takeout food, I park in visitors' because it's quicker to get into my condo and the food is hotter.

I've forgotten dozens of times to later move my car back into my spot. Is that similar?

Just trying to point out how a child (or a dog) is not the same as a takeout food. It is inexcusable, even if you do get caught up in other things. Name me one thing that supersedes the priority of your child's safety.
Oh I agree. I am just saying I can understand someone truly forgetting. I believe that reasoning. I don’t think that it makes it excusable in any way. In fact I am stating the opposite. I can understand forgetting but I wouldn’t excuse it
 
  • Like
Reactions: HumbleJoe

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Very sad. In the related news, 49 illegal migrants died inside an hot trailer trying to enter Texas.
 

Sugarsweet905

Well-known member
May 17, 2022
518
823
93
There are some truly heartless people on this board.
The Mom was in a rush, like many of us are these days.
She was supposed to take the child to daycare, because someone else couldn't do it when they usually do. She had many stops to make that morning, and forgot to drop the child at daycare.
The child was probably asleep, in the rear facing car seat that is likely always in the back seat of the car.
The kid wasn't making any sounds, and you can't see the kid in the seat from the front when the seat faces backwards. She likely forgot she even had the child with her, and it is not that difficult to do under those circumstances.

And what that Mother is going through right now is worse than the most torturous kind of Hell any of us could possible imagine.
This simple little slip of the mind, on a busy morning, will haunt her dreams and every waking second of her life until the day she dies.
And you want to cast judgment on her.
No one here is fit nor capable of judging this woman anymore than she is already judging herself every minute of the day.

Justice must serve specific goals, to punish the guilty, to ensure the safety of the public, and to ensure the person does not commit the crime again.
This woman is no danger to the public.
You can be assured, she will never do anything like this again.
As for punishment. There is little the legal system can do to even come close to the punishment she will be putting herself through FOREVER.
Sometimes justice happens without the intervention of the police.
General deterrence can also be considered, however it generally doesn't work as a form of justice. Do I believe she should be charged, No. That being said if it wasn't a well respected teacher, but a single mother who is struggling to make ends meet and not part of the privileged section of society the legal result would be different. That in and of itself is a whole other argument.
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,532
1,403
113
Oblivion
The crown will and should charge her for criminal negligence causing death. The relationship to the deceased should not be a mitigating factor nor should consideration of possible remorse that she may suffer. She is not the only family member that will grieve. Mental illness, incapacity would be the only way that she should escape charges otherwise a dangerous precedent will have been set.
Public opinion, “It could have happened to any of us” is a non starter towards her not being charged In this careless action resulting in immense suffering and ultimately death.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: John Wick

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,814
2,762
113
The crown will and should charge her for criminal negligence causing death. The relationship to the deceased should not be a mitigating factor nor should consideration of possible remorse that she may suffer. She is not the only family member that will grieve. Mental illness, incapacity would be the only way that she should escape charges otherwise a dangerous precedent will have been set.
Public opinion, “It could have happened to any of us” is a non starter towards her not being charged In this careless action resulting in immense suffering and ultimately death.
That's not going to happen. As much as you'd like to see her rot in jail, there's little chance of conviction on a charge like that.
 

John Wick

Baba Yaga
Oct 25, 2019
2,269
2,498
113
This whole discussion is ridiculous.

This is a clear case of involuntary manslaughter caused by criminal negligence. The mother is unequivocally guilty. Full stop. She should be charged, prosecuted and sentenced accordingly.

A child is dead. There is no reasonable excuse under the law to ignore that fact, nor to demure from pressing charges.

If the child had been accidentally hit by a drunk driver and killed, the same politically correct bleeding hearts in this thread that are saying "Gosh, she's suffered enough because it was her kid' are the same ones who'd be hopping up and down outraged, screaming for the driver to be served up for disembowelment.

Such hypocrisy and predictable posts from the usual lefties.
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,532
1,403
113
Oblivion
That's not going to happen. As much as you'd like to see her rot in jail, there's little chance of conviction on a charge like that.
I would not like to see anything other than the scales of justice and the laws of the land being applied. Likely she will be charged by the crown and if convicted serve no jail time. If she is not even charged then an unfortunate precedent may be set.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,814
2,762
113
I would not like to see anything other than the scales of justice and the laws of the land being applied. Likely she will be charged by the crown and if convicted serve no jail time. If she is not even charged then an unfortunate precedent may be set.
According to KidsandCars.org, which tracks children's deaths associated with automobiles in the US, 43 percent of caregivers who unintentionally left children in hot cars did not face charges, and 11 percent were charged but not convicted.
 

angrymime666

Well-known member
May 8, 2008
1,094
656
113
if you cant be responsible enough not to neglect your kids, people should not be parents. parental rights should be removed for the safety of any other living children. using stress or any other reasons is a cop out for not taking responsibility. lots of people have stressful lives and deal with even worse shit. doesnt mean they would abuse or neglect their kids.
 

lomotil

Well-known member
Mar 14, 2004
6,532
1,403
113
Oblivion
According to KidsandCars.org, which tracks children's deaths associated with automobiles in the US, 43 percent of caregivers who unintentionally left children in hot cars did not face charges, and 11 percent were charged but not convicted.
Maybe there should be a Good Samaritan like clause that if one sees an infant or toddler left alone in a car in winter cold or summer heat and the car window is smashed to free the child, no charges should result either as time could be of the essence. So smash the glass and call 911 so that LE doesn’t get too bent out of shape. Fuck the car and the driver that left the child unattended!
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,814
2,762
113
if you cant be responsible enough not to neglect your kids, people should not be parents. parental rights should be removed for the safety of any other living children. using stress or any other reasons is a cop out for not taking responsibility. lots of people have stressful lives and deal with even worse shit. doesnt mean they would abuse or neglect their kids.
Since there's no course to take, no test to pass, anyone can become a parent. Many aren't responsible enough to become parents. Others are, but then make a mistake. That's the problem with humans, they're not perfect. I'm sure if you asked friends of the woman from Bancroft if she was responsible enough to have kids (before leaving her kid in the car), her friend would overwhelmingly say yes.


Maybe there should be a Good Samaritan like clause that if one sees an infant or toddler left alone in a car in winter cold or summer heat and the car window is smashed to free the child, no charges should result either as time could be of the essence. So smash the glass and call 911 so that LE doesn’t get too bent out of shape. Fuck the car and the driver that left the child unattended!
Nobody's going to get charged for rescuing a child or pet from a hot or freezing cold car. The problem is, most of the time it's too late.
 
Last edited:

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
9,458
9,596
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Maybe there should be a Good Samaritan like clause that if one sees an infant or toddler left alone in a car in winter cold or summer heat and the car window is smashed to free the child, no charges should result either as time could be of the essence. So smash the glass and call 911 so that LE doesn’t get too bent out of shape. Fuck the car and the driver that left the child unattended!
First - I personally would gladly be charged for breaking into a car to rescue an animal or child but that is me.

Second - if a person is not careful, they can injury the animal or child they are trying to rescue. You have to watch which window and how you break it. You may not have to “smash” the window. You could break the driver side window and unlock the lock while the animal or child are in the back passenger side, being careful not to spray the glass, but some people in a panic, could smash the passenger side window and cause more damage

Lastly, here in Ontario, LE are not allow to enter a vehicle unless the animal or child is in clear distress. So crying or whining is not enough. They have to be physically feeling the effects of the heat/cold and be in true medical distress, showing symptoms before a cop and break a window can render aid. Found that out when a person left a dog in the car. It was there for hours. It was hot-ish. Not heat wave but nice sunny summer day. The windows were crack open and there was a bowl knocked over which we assumed was suppose to be for water. The dog was panting but not hard. There was nothing to cop could do. She has to wait for the owner to finally return and give him a warning. That is it.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,814
2,762
113
First - I personally would gladly be charged for breaking into a car to rescue an animal or child but that is me.

Second - if a person is not careful, they can injury the animal or child they are trying to rescue. You have to watch which window and how you break it. You may not have to “smash” the window. You could break the driver side window and unlock the lock while the animal or child are in the back passenger side, being careful not to spray the glass, but some people in a panic, could smash the passenger side window and cause more damage
All side windows are tempered glass and will shatter into small cubes. It only makes sense to smash the one furthest from the person you're trying to recue. But the likelihood of being injured by the broken safety glass is slim to none.

Lastly, here in Ontario, LE are not allow to enter a vehicle unless the animal or child is in clear distress. So crying or whining is not enough. They have to be physically feeling the effects of the heat/cold and be in true medical distress, showing symptoms before a cop and break a window can render aid. Found that out when a person left a dog in the car. It was there for hours. It was hot-ish. Not heat wave but nice sunny summer day. The windows were crack open and there was a bowl knocked over which we assumed was suppose to be for water. The dog was panting but not hard. There was nothing to cop could do. She has to wait for the owner to finally return and give him a warning. That is it.
This is not entirely true. In the case of a child, if they're locked in an unattended hot/cold car for any length of time with no sign of a caregiver in sight, LE would be allowed to break in. A child can die in as little as an hour if left in a hot car. There's no way LE would just stand there waiting for "visible symptoms" before they acted.
 
Toronto Escorts