Flight attendant snaps, makes dramatic exit

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
By CHRIS HERRING

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704164904575421893229913632.html

The lawyer representing a JetBlue flight attendant who allegedly unleashed expletives over an intercom at a plane full of passengers before exiting via the emergency chute offered his client's account of the incident Tuesday, saying it was preceded by two separate run-ins with a rude female passenger.

Steven Slater, 38 years old, was arraigned in Queens Supreme Court and Judge Mary O'Donoghue set his bail at $2,500. He walked into court wearing a green shirt, plaid shorts and a slight smile—a reaction his court-appointed attorney said was prompted by the media coverage of his arrest.

"I think he can't believe the amount of attention this is getting," Howard Turman said following the arraignment. He said his client posted bail but wasn't sure whether he'd been released.

The incident, which took place shortly after noon on Monday at John F. Kennedy Airport, sparked immense interest on social networking sites. On Facebook, a "Steven Slater Legal Defense Fund" page alone had nearly 400 members, many of whom said they would donate, as of Tuesday night. A Facebook fan page for Mr. Slater had topped 65,000 supporters.

Prosecutors have charged Mr. Slater with trespassing, criminal mischief and reckless endangerment, saying his activation of the emergency chute could have been dangerous had there been anyone below on the tarmac. He could face up to seven years in prison if convicted.

Attorney Howard Turman says his client probably doesn't work for jetBlue any more.
.Mr. Turman said his client was provoked during the ordeal, and that a female passenger had been involved in two encounters with Mr. Slater during the trip from Pittsburgh.

Mr. Turman's account differed from the authorities', who made no mention of problems prior to takeoff. He said the woman was verbally abusive to his client before the flight took off, and that when Mr. Slater attempted to break up a dispute between the woman and a man concerning the overhead space the woman "slammed the overhead into [Mr. Slater's] head."

Mr. Turman said the second incident took place after the plane landed: When the woman was asked to wait to collect some of her luggage, she began swearing at Mr. Slater "a great deal" for a second time. Authorities have not released the name of the woman, and it is unclear whether she's been interviewed as part of the investigation.

JetBlue announced Tuesday that it had suspended Mr. Slater pending the outcome of the investigation. A spokesman declined to explain the terms of the suspension.

The judge set a Sept. 21 date for Mr. Slater's next hearing.
 

alexmst

New member
Dec 27, 2004
6,939
1
0
Just guessing, but if there was a dispute before take off over the carry on being in the bin, it could be a case of the bin above her seat was full and the FA told her to put her bag in a bin at the back of the plane that had available space. As those who fly often know, when one does this, once the plane has landed, the passengers get up and it is impossible to go back several rows to get your bag as people are in the way. One has two options - either get up before the seat belt sign is turned off and go back and get the bag and bring it back to your seat, or else wait in your seat until most of the passengers have left and the aisle is clear to go back anf get the bag. I've had to wait until the plane was empty to go back and get my bag. If the woman in questions was one of those "I'm in a rush" types, waiting for the plane to empty would enrage her if the bin above her seat was full with the other people in her row's stuff when she got on he plane.

Anyway, the FA sounds like a funny guy who went postal in a non-violent way. It is funny. If they charge him they should at least ban teh woman from flying on the airline IMHO. I think I read that the charged him with deploying the slide because it inflates with 3000 lbs of pressure per sq inch in seconds and could have hit ground crew servicing the plane who wren't expecting the slide to be deployed.
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,780
0
0
Mr. Turman's account differed from the authorities', who made no mention of problems prior to takeoff. He said the woman was verbally abusive to his client before the flight took off, and that when Mr. Slater attempted to break up a dispute between the woman and a man concerning the overhead space the woman "slammed the overhead into [Mr. Slater's] head."

Mr. Turman said the second incident took place after the plane landed: When the woman was asked to wait to collect some of her luggage, she began swearing at Mr. Slater "a great deal" for a second time. Authorities have not released the name of the woman, and it is unclear whether she's been interviewed as part of the investigation.
The police should investigate the actions of that woman. Also, Mr. Turman should ask his lawyer about filing a civil lawsuit against that woman. No employee should be subject to physical and/or verbal abuse by anybody (even a paying customer). That woman needs to learn a lesson.
 

fun-guy

Executive Senior Member
Jun 29, 2005
7,276
3
38
This guy will now become famous, he'll probably get some sort of reality show, ie. how to get fired from your job, et., and he'll make more money that he dreamed possible. He'll show up on talk shows and be in high demand. He represents how Americans feel today about their economy and the frustrations of life, thus all the support. Only in America.
 

red

you must be fk'n kid'g me
Nov 13, 2001
17,572
8
38
what i dont understand is why they had to send so many cops to arrest him
 

777flyer

New member
Feb 13, 2010
28
0
1
I have been in the airline industry for 30 or so years since my late teens, this incident is certainly one of the more bizarre ones.....

First of all, why is the media glamourizing what this guy did, and make him a folk hero ????

What this CLOWN did was endanger the lives of his passengers, crew AND unsuspecting ground personnel.

If anyone has seen the deployment of an emergency chute, not only is it a violent reaction ( because it deploys so fast ) but anyone underneath in all likelihood would be injured OR KILLED if struck by it.....

Was the FA a victim of ABUSE .... most certainly !....however, the FA's recourse would have resulted in SEVERE CRIMINAL and Civil actions against the passenger, who in all likelihood could have been charged with a felony for improper behaviour and endangering other passenger's during the flight , and THEN A CIVIL LAW SUIT for injuring the FA with the falling bag, which injured the FA.....

The Law, FOR VERY good reasons, deals harshly with those causing any sort of problems on an airplane....this FA, should have done the intelligent thing, which was to report the passenger to the Captain, who would have alerted the authorities, who at the end of the flight would have boarded the plane, and escorted the unwieldy passenger IN HANDCUFFS......wouldn't that have been a sweet payback ?

This guy is not a hero, he is a nut case that deserves to be fired, AND THEN criminally charged...........
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,780
0
0
Was the FA a victim of ABUSE .... most certainly !....however, the FA's recourse would have resulted in SEVERE CRIMINAL and Civil actions against the passenger, who in all likelihood could have been charged with a felony for improper behaviour and endangering other passenger's during the flight , and THEN A CIVIL LAW SUIT for injuring the FA with the falling bag, which injured the FA.....
I was at Canadian Tire earlier to-day. There was a sign behind the customer service desk which read something like this.

"Canadian Tire is committed to a safe workplace for its employees. Any PHYSICAL and/or VERBAL ABUSE of CT staff will not be tolerated."
 

Moraff

Active member
Nov 14, 2003
3,648
0
36
I was at Canadian Tire earlier to-day. There was a sign behind the customer service desk which read something like this.

"Canadian Tire is committed to a safe workplace for its employees. Any PHYSICAL and/or VERBAL ABUSE of CT staff will not be tolerated."
Think that is the law that you are entitled to a safe and harrassment-free workplace... but nice to see CT saying they want to follow the law.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,447
1,331
113
Think that is the law that you are entitled to a safe and harrassment-free workplace... but nice to see CT saying they want to follow the law.
I never understood why people think it is ok to abuse some young kid making minumum wage, regardless of how idiotic they can be.
 
Toronto Escorts