What's "typical" is how you once again evaded the fact that the international media all say that you are completely wrong and that the adjustments to the data were significant.Typical of you, isn't it?
To quote the bolded sub-headline in the Dana Nuccittelli article: "The Adjustments are Important"
Dana also quotes Zeke Hausfather on the significance of the methodology used for sea surface temperatures (with emphasis added by me): "This change is by far the largest single factor responsible for changing global temperatures in the past 17 years compared to temperatures found in the prior NOAA record."
http://www.theguardian.com/environm...bout-the-noaa-global-warming-faux-pause-paper
That sounds a lot bigger than the "minor differences" from "normal processes" that you've been talking about. Doesn't it?
https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=5433084#post5433084