OK...I have a question for the board.
It seems to me that when there are reviews of what most of us would consider hotties - pretty face, tight bodies etc., the term Hot is used. Sometimes you would see it as in "hot body" "smoking ass" etc.
Why is is when there are reviews of ladies whom most of us would not consider hot that the term hot is not used by the reviewer. Is this a fetish? Is it something the reviewer is embarrassed about (why would he post at all if that was the case?)
I'm thinking if you are paying money to see a lady, that you would find her hot in your eyes...no?
Regardless of service (some of the not hot ladies apparently give very good service) you never hear the term hot. You hear things like "lookswise she is not for everyone". Is this because some guys just like less than hot chicks? Is it because you don't feel you could get a hot chick even if you paid for it? Is it because your a 60 plus fat balding dude with garlic breath?
Please enlighten me...personally I'd rather book a hot chick...
It seems to me that when there are reviews of what most of us would consider hotties - pretty face, tight bodies etc., the term Hot is used. Sometimes you would see it as in "hot body" "smoking ass" etc.
Why is is when there are reviews of ladies whom most of us would not consider hot that the term hot is not used by the reviewer. Is this a fetish? Is it something the reviewer is embarrassed about (why would he post at all if that was the case?)
I'm thinking if you are paying money to see a lady, that you would find her hot in your eyes...no?
Regardless of service (some of the not hot ladies apparently give very good service) you never hear the term hot. You hear things like "lookswise she is not for everyone". Is this because some guys just like less than hot chicks? Is it because you don't feel you could get a hot chick even if you paid for it? Is it because your a 60 plus fat balding dude with garlic breath?
Please enlighten me...personally I'd rather book a hot chick...

