what do you guys do when your girl takes of her push-up bra and you realize that she has saggy boobs? Is that considered false ad?
False advertising?
- Thread starter toughb
- Start date
Most of these girls are accepting dates with us sight unseen. I don't hear them crying foul when we show up at their door, not meeting their expectations...i dont get it...........................
also it isn't false advertising because its understandable why girls do it but there should be something like disclaimer if girl is heavily tatted
If you have a specific desire, want, need, 'menu item' you can visit their websites, or ads and see exactly what they offer, you get their rate, you get to look at pictures of them from every angle and in different states of undress.. they give you their phone number, their email address.. just about every detail of their lives.. If you have a very specific 'turn off' then don't you think you can take some responsibility for yourself and simply... ask?
Like all advertising, the goal is to create awareness, drive interest and ultimately increase business (advertising should be considered an investment not an expense). In doing so it also creates an expectation and to an extent a "contract" (thats why the gov't will take action where "false advertising" is clear").
If an SP wants to drive "one time" visits, great pics will go a long way. Hence the who B&S scam and the popularity of tools like Tineye and Google. They are only worried about one transaction and either dont care or move on after the first (usually a disappointment for the client). The assumption is there is a sucker born every minute, so there will always be a "next".
The other extreme is SP's who create an impression, image and expectation that they fully meet or actually exceed during a meeting. The ones that become "legendary"
And in the middle there are those that create an expectation and dont fully live up to it but still its a good experience - often reported as "a little heavier than the pics", "little saggy", "the best CBJ".
Im not a Tattoo fan. Always would prefer no tats. Not judging the person, just my preference in looks (like perky natural breasts, nice butt, etc). Like most people, I can overlook somethings for the rest of the package. Or they can add to the rest of a package I dont like anyway. If my expectation is set by "no tat" pics, my disappointment is the SP's creation, not mine. Just like if that incredible looking butt ends up being flat and cheesy with a lot of Photoshop work or a "GFE experience" that doesnt kiss.
Understand the SP's desire for privacy. I assume if you have a clear facial pic, then removing the tats is hardly for personal privacy or safety. For that matter, in many cases, even without a face showing I somehow wonder if naked pics dont pretty well identify someone to someone who is familiar with a womans naked body. But just a thought.
So, my preference is for full disclosure - either leave the tats in or clear disclosure they have been removed. ANY Photoshop or image manipulation should be disclosed, just like any restrictions in service.
Create interest and excitement - absolutely. Lure me in with seductive pictures and great verbage - for sure. Disappoint me by creating an image that isnt delivered (looks, personality, service) - thanks, but no thanks.
So in the end, its no different than cars, restaurants or other advertisers. Just that when its done right, its a LOT more fun!
My personal taste, which drives my personal buying decisions. But, isnt that what TERB is about - sharing personal experience?
If an SP wants to drive "one time" visits, great pics will go a long way. Hence the who B&S scam and the popularity of tools like Tineye and Google. They are only worried about one transaction and either dont care or move on after the first (usually a disappointment for the client). The assumption is there is a sucker born every minute, so there will always be a "next".
The other extreme is SP's who create an impression, image and expectation that they fully meet or actually exceed during a meeting. The ones that become "legendary"
And in the middle there are those that create an expectation and dont fully live up to it but still its a good experience - often reported as "a little heavier than the pics", "little saggy", "the best CBJ".
Im not a Tattoo fan. Always would prefer no tats. Not judging the person, just my preference in looks (like perky natural breasts, nice butt, etc). Like most people, I can overlook somethings for the rest of the package. Or they can add to the rest of a package I dont like anyway. If my expectation is set by "no tat" pics, my disappointment is the SP's creation, not mine. Just like if that incredible looking butt ends up being flat and cheesy with a lot of Photoshop work or a "GFE experience" that doesnt kiss.
Understand the SP's desire for privacy. I assume if you have a clear facial pic, then removing the tats is hardly for personal privacy or safety. For that matter, in many cases, even without a face showing I somehow wonder if naked pics dont pretty well identify someone to someone who is familiar with a womans naked body. But just a thought.
So, my preference is for full disclosure - either leave the tats in or clear disclosure they have been removed. ANY Photoshop or image manipulation should be disclosed, just like any restrictions in service.
Create interest and excitement - absolutely. Lure me in with seductive pictures and great verbage - for sure. Disappoint me by creating an image that isnt delivered (looks, personality, service) - thanks, but no thanks.
So in the end, its no different than cars, restaurants or other advertisers. Just that when its done right, its a LOT more fun!
My personal taste, which drives my personal buying decisions. But, isnt that what TERB is about - sharing personal experience?
So, you're saying that in ALL advertising, there's never once been a retouched photo? All those victoria secret ads I see.. all the ads for the perfect Thanksgiving turkey? Not a single ad.. ever modified to present a better view of a product?
These girls aren't trying to "hide" anything from you, they are protecting their safety, and anonymity. Does removing their tattoos from a photo make them a more desirable product? I mean, honestly if boobs were photographically enhanced, bigger bellies removes, asses shrunk down.. I can see your point. Removing a few tattoos? This is NOT comparable to a B&S tactic, whatsoever.
Don't tell me you've never emailed a girl a request, a question, a desire of yours. Why is it so hard to just ask if it's such a big deal?
As for Terb, you are right. This is about sharing personal experiences.. maybe if you're considering a specific girl, and you've read a few reviews on her, PM the poster. It's not hard to ask 'Hey, I heard you saw ____, is she a heavily tattoo'd girl?' if you're too embarrassed about hurting the girl's feelings or something. Share that experience with your fellow Terbites.
"So, you're saying that in ALL advertising, there's never once been a retouched photo? All those victoria secret ads I see.. all the ads for the perfect Thanksgiving turkey? Not a single ad.. ever modified to present a better view of a product? "
No, thats not what I said. Enhancing and putting the best view forward is standard practice. Those ads aren't selling the woman, they are selling what they are wearing. Creating an image - absolutely. But the woman is a prop, like the set they are shot on. Putting the best image forward for the product. If an advertiser shows a product in a commercial that isnt available, that is false advertising (unless clearly advised). Check car commercials - fine print says "includes optional packages".
Difference is that the lady (or gentleman if you find a site with male escorts) IS the product (sounds cold but it is what it is). And for some, it does matter. Maybe you dont care about tats. Some do.
I still dont see the anonymity/safety factor for most. If the face shows, do tats matter? You wouldnt recognize your girlfriends naked body? Naked pics are less dangerous than meeting someone you dont know, in an illegal or borderline situation adds to the "danger"??
Lots of righteous indignation to follow, but step back and look at reality
No, thats not what I said. Enhancing and putting the best view forward is standard practice. Those ads aren't selling the woman, they are selling what they are wearing. Creating an image - absolutely. But the woman is a prop, like the set they are shot on. Putting the best image forward for the product. If an advertiser shows a product in a commercial that isnt available, that is false advertising (unless clearly advised). Check car commercials - fine print says "includes optional packages".
Difference is that the lady (or gentleman if you find a site with male escorts) IS the product (sounds cold but it is what it is). And for some, it does matter. Maybe you dont care about tats. Some do.
I still dont see the anonymity/safety factor for most. If the face shows, do tats matter? You wouldnt recognize your girlfriends naked body? Naked pics are less dangerous than meeting someone you dont know, in an illegal or borderline situation adds to the "danger"??
Lots of righteous indignation to follow, but step back and look at reality
