ExpressVu vs. Rogers: Should I make the switch?

Johnnysco

New member
Mar 31, 2002
28
0
0
64
Toronto
I see Rogers is increasing the cost for basic cable again. I'm wondering whether it's time to switch to Bell's ExpressVu or StarChoice (are they still around?). Any advice from you fine folks? Thanks kindly.
 

to-guy69

New member
Mar 28, 2004
1,469
0
0
Sonic Temple
Legal satellite service isn't all what it's cooked up to be...there is a reason why most haven't adoped this phenomenon. Here are some reason's why:

You still need a satellite receiver box per TV if you have more than 1 TV in your residence. The more receivers you need, the more money it costs you...otherwise all TVs in the house will play the same channel under 1 box.

Satellite signals are flaky in bad or intermittent weather resulting in choppy pixelization or even outages. If we were living in Miami, then it wouldn't be a problem, however, in cold Canada (6/12 months)...it IS a problem. Cable is more reliable than satellite....signal wise and always will be.

If something goes wrong with your dish after your warranty period expires (frost, out of place by wind, mechanial problem, ect.) there is a fee to have someone come over to have a look at...and it's not cheap either (sometimes up to $60 just for a look at it let alone any fixes it requires). Cable service calls are always FREE with their service.

Even though cable service isn't all that cheap either and the reality is that most people don't watch more than 7-8 channels on a regular basis.....it's still a better alternative...and that's why it leads in market share over satellite.

Don't bother with LookTV. There are a very small pod in the large sea of things. There service and support are sub par at best. Not having alot of subscribers is why. Unless they offer you free installation to try it out, then don't bother. Otherwise, if you want to leave them, you will be paying 2 installation fees (one for LookTV and another to install again with a REAL cable provider).
 

zzap

a muddy reclining Buddha
to-guy69 said:
Satellite signals are flaky in bad or intermittent weather resulting in choppy pixelization or even outages. If we were living in Miami, then it wouldn't be a problem, however, in cold Canada (6/12 months)...it IS a problem. Cable is more reliable than satellite....signal wise and always will be.
You’re just totally with this statement! Rain fade is a small problem with satellite and it only happens when you have a very heavy thunderstorm and lasts only a few minutes. I’ve been on satellite for years and it’s a problem that happens a few times a year really only in the summer time. I upgraded to a 36 inch dish from an 18 inch and rain fade fade problems were gone. Now for anyone who lives in Miami that’s the thunderstorm capital of the USA and they are going to experience rain fade in Miami way more then anyone ever will in Toronto.

I was a cable sub since 1970 to 1999 and getting away for Rogers was the best thing I’ve ever done.
 

aries

Member
Jun 11, 2002
573
6
18
I agree with Zap, I've never ever had a problem in the winter. It only happens during those very humid summer days when you see those REALLY dark clouds and only lasts a few mins. Satelitte TV is way better than cable, the picture quailty is outstanding.
 

Johnnysco

New member
Mar 31, 2002
28
0
0
64
Toronto
What about the cost?

Thanks for the input, guys. So I'm convinced there are no major picture problems. But what about the potentially higher cost?
 

Svend

New member
Feb 10, 2005
4,424
4
0
They're about the same cost.
My selling feature for satellite is the ability to receive east and west coast feeds of all the networks or the CBC service from 5 different timezones. It's easier to catch a show if given this choice if you don't have a PVR or can't be bothered videotaping.
The main drawback is ocassional loss of signal in heavy rainstorms.
 

Svend

New member
Feb 10, 2005
4,424
4
0
Expressvu PVRs do all those things also.
Yes, you're right about needing a clear sightline to the satellite.
 
Toronto Escorts