Exclusivity/ monogamy contracts

ChloeSummers

New member
Jan 10, 2016
63
0
0
Ottawa
Hello Terbites!

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, or if an Sp should be starting a thread ( I'm more of a lurker and use ' the other board' so I'm not 100% on the etiquette here.)

I was just wondering if there was a market for monogamy contracts between Sp's and clients. If so, what are people's thoughts? Has anyone had experience with that?

I wouldn't say I am offering them per se, but it is something that has had me curious. Sugar Baby relationships are pretty common, and I was wondering if the two worlds were separate and best kept on 'Seeking Arrangement' e.t.c

Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
-Chloe Summers.
 
Hello Terbites!

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, or if an Sp should be starting a thread ( I'm more of a lurker and use ' the other board' so I'm not 100% on the etiquette here.)

I was just wondering if there was a market for monogamy contracts between Sp's and clients. If so, what are people's thoughts? Has anyone had experience with that?

I wouldn't say I am offering them per se, but it is something that has had me curious. Sugar Baby relationships are pretty common, and I was wondering if the two worlds were separate and best kept on 'Seeking Arrangement' e.t.c

Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
-Chloe Summers.

Personally, I don't have any experience on this topic. But this thread on sugar (SD/SB) relationship should provide you with some ideas on the topic -

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...xperience-with-Sugar-Baby-relationships/page7
 
Hello Terbites!

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, or if an Sp should be starting a thread ( I'm more of a lurker and use ' the other board' so I'm not 100% on the etiquette here.)

I was just wondering if there was a market for monogamy contracts between Sp's and clients. If so, what are people's thoughts? Has anyone had experience with that?

I wouldn't say I am offering them per se, but it is something that has had me curious. Sugar Baby relationships are pretty common, and I was wondering if the two worlds were separate and best kept on 'Seeking Arrangement' e.t.c

Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
-Chloe Summers.

I haven't seen any, and not sure if there is a market. I think it may go against the reason many partake - some variety.

Why would you want a contract like that?
 
I would assume it is so that BBFS is on the menu.

God no.

It just means exclusivity to one client and yes they happen. Websites get taken down. Advertisements stop. Or for the females who don't actively advertise, just a promise.

They exist and yes there is a market for it, just like any other desire. It just isn't openly advertised. More money does not equal less protection though, no matter what the assumption may be. Just because a guy is giving more money does not give him the right to expect unprotected services if she isn't comfortable.

Also, you guys are thinking way too literal. Often times, there is no "binding legal document" that is put in play. Just an agreement of terms and a sum of money that is given. These arrangements are built on trust and respect for one another over a long period of time, more than anything else. It doesn't happen with a one-time client.
There are also feelings invested. Genuinely caring for the other person.

This is why you'll never hear about them, but trust and believe they exist and are far more common than most people will have you believe.
 
I am not at all doubting your perception of why these contracts exist Chloe, but the cynical side of me as a client says "why will I pay for something that gets me no material benefit?" The only real benefit of exclusivity without true love is unprotected sex...or am I just being callous?

Not at all. Some people search for different things that's all. What fulfills you isn't the same for another gentleman and that's okay.

Some people don't even like intercourse or can't perform to completion and look for other ways to fill that void through companionship. It isn't entirely about the physical for some or about "scoring". There are different forms of intimacy that some men search for and this train of thinking is quite prevalent with these arrangements. It's often the reason for it.

Remember some guys are cool with routine. They don't need variety. You see that on here too when people talk about sticking with their 1-2 regulars over trying something new. The great thing about these things are that it isn't permanent. This isn't a marriage and you can break free whenever you like.
 
One time I was approach by a woman who wanted something like you are talking about. She wanted all expenses paid, and to be harboured in one of the most expensive places around plus $40000/month. All for exclusivity. Why anyone whould do that is beyond me.
 
For me, the allure of going to a provider is to get some variety, so a situation like this wouldn't work for me.

I get Chloe's point about establishing an exclusive relationship, but I bet those are the exception rather than the norm.

It would be interesting what % of clients would consider this. It would surprise me a lot if it were more that 15-20%.
 
I am not at all doubting your perception of why these contracts exist Chloe, but the cynical side of me as a client says "why will I pay for something that gets me no material benefit?" The only real benefit of exclusivity without true love is unprotected sex...or am I just being callous? I understand that websites get taken down and advertisements stop, and I have seen "former escorts" after they stopped publicly advertising, but then never thought to demand a payment for exclusivity. As for "there are also feelings invested..." I totally agree, but if there are true feelings invested there will be no expectation of payment for fidelity.

True, but I do think you are missing one key idea.

While feelings are invested, this is still a fantasy. The power of a true professional is that she never lets herself lose sight of the dynamic. You are paying for an experience. Does that mean she can't genuinely care for you? No, it doesn't! But she isn't your girlfriend. She is a companion for hire.

The main thing about exclusivity for the companion is her opportunity cost of only seeing you. That's the reason for payment. Her fee, whatever it may be is most likely the estimate of the future profit she's giving up for you.
Unless you want to marry the girl, it is just basic economics.
 
I once brought up an sp from San Diego. She advertised $12,500/day minimum 2 days, or $25,000. I had her for half of Friday , and the weekend and we negotiated $30,000. Without a doubt the stupidist move I have ever made. But I was young and actually thought you get what you pay for. Shall we say, NOT! So asking $40000 for the month is not out of line in that world.
 
Hello Terbites!

I'm not sure if this is the right place to post this, or if an Sp should be starting a thread ( I'm more of a lurker and use ' the other board' so I'm not 100% on the etiquette here.)

I was just wondering if there was a market for monogamy contracts between Sp's and clients. If so, what are people's thoughts? Has anyone had experience with that?

I wouldn't say I am offering them per se, but it is something that has had me curious. Sugar Baby relationships are pretty common, and I was wondering if the two worlds were separate and best kept on 'Seeking Arrangement' e.t.c

Thanks in advance.
Best wishes,
-Chloe Summers.
ha ha ha ha that's funny