Pickering Angels

Eight steps to immediately accelerate climate action

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,286
2,651
113
Ghawar
Hannah Daly
Dec 1 2022

When he assumes the role of Taoiseach again later this month, Leo Varadkar will need to lead from the front and treat climate change as the emergency it is, if our emissions are to stay below legally binding carbon budgets.

Despite high ambition, Ireland still has its foot on the accelerator of global heating with greenhouse gas emissions still rising, and the Government has a huge amount of work ahead to turn this around.

The climate action plan due to be published later this month will contain hundreds of necessary measures – there are no shortcuts or silver bullets. But I propose the following eight ideas – informed by conversations I’ve had with climate experts – which should be particularly high on the agenda for the incoming Taoiseach and Government.

1. Leaders must lead: Politicians may think climate action measures will be unpopular and be reluctant to spark a water charges-type revolt. But as the cost of a delayed transition becomes clear, politicians who drive bold climate action will be on the right side of history. Varadkar can show direct leadership by personally chairing the Climate Action Delivery Board, becoming an expert in climate change and its solutions – reading The Climate Book by Greta Thunberg is a great place to start – and by channelling his authority to call out disinformation, whataboutery and obfuscation.

2. Make the climate emergency real: In a direct address to the nation and through ongoing, widespread public engagement, leaders must be blunt about how serious the situation is globally: climate change already brought devastation in 2022, including 20,000 excess deaths from European heatwaves and tens of millions displaced in Pakistan from flooding. And this is just the beginning.

They should explain why climate action is vital, and be honest with the public, businesses and farmers that it requires vast transformations. People should be presented with a picture of a better, sustainable future and be asked to do what they can to shift society on to that path, harnessing the social solidarity and trust shown during the pandemic.

3. Lead by example: To credibly ask people to take climate action, the Government must first show how it is decarbonising its own operations. That means removing the car park at Leinster House, putting solar panels on all government buildings, driving an energy saving campaign and monitoring and reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from government air-travel. People won’t get on board if they suspect hypocrisy.

4. Equip State bodies and the Civil Service: Institutions and government departments that regulate and support energy utilities, transport, farming and other sectors are key actors for climate action. But the status quo is powerful, and often deeply entrenched. The Government must ensure these organisations are fully aligned with climate action and have the necessary leadership, resources, mandate and accountability.

5. Use emergency powers to slash fossil fuel power generation: Currently, multiple fossil fuel generators must run at all times to keep the power grid functioning, even when renewables can more than meet electricity needs, increasing emissions and bills. Moreover, roll-out of renewable wind and solar is too slow. The Government has already used emergency legislation to procure backup power capacity to deal with the threat of blackouts: it can, and should, put carbon budgets on the same emergency footing to modernise the grid and accelerate renewables deployment.

6. Walk the walk on sustainable mobility: Active travel infrastructure is a national priority, but local authorities have been far too slow in rolling it out. The Government should require that all (not just new and upgraded) urban streets be compatible with the best-practice design standard this decade, becoming car-free before long.

It should immediately make towns and cities car-free on Sundays to show people what a pleasant urban realm can look like, and sign the contract for Metrolink with urgency to give the 175,000 Dubliners within walking distance a sustainable and modern transport option. And obviously, new SUVs should be taxed out of existence.

7. Restore Ireland’s depleted nature with new national parks: Human activities are causing a mass extinction event, as well as climate change. Ireland’s native ecosystem, temperate rainforest, has nearly completely vanished. That most people don’t know this fact is a mark of how nature-depleted this country is. New national parks to restore rainforest can be a multigenerational project, like building a cathedral.

8. Align enterprise strategy with climate policy: The IDA and Enterprise Ireland should be tasked with assisting existing industries to decarbonise quickly, with growing only clean industries, and identifying economic opportunities in the low-carbon transition, like cellular meat and sustainable aviation fuels.

Hannah Daly is a professor in sustainable energy at the Environmental Research Institute and MaREI Centre at UCC

 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,286
2,651
113
Ghawar
She is a science professor. Climate sheeple worships climate scientists
and call the less gullible science deniers.

I actually think some of her suggestions are worthy of Trudeau's attention.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,666
27,755
113
She is a science professor. Climate sheeple worships climate scientists
and call the less gullible science deniers.

I actually think some of her suggestions are worthy of Trudeau's attention.
The oil&gas industry just wants to keep selling oil&gas even if its going to make life miserable for their children or grandchildren.
They know what they are doing.
Scientists are not gullible.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,932
9,358
113
Although I support climate change initiatives, using emergency powers to stop fossil fuel usage or to consider this as some sort of crisis is absolutely ridiculous.

There is a recent trend to misuse executive powers to push ideologically motivated political positions. Things need to be legislated not forced through executive powers.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,286
2,651
113
Ghawar
Canada is banning gas-powered car sales by
2035. I suppose the ban will be legislated.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,666
27,755
113
Although I support climate change initiatives, using emergency powers to stop fossil fuel usage or to consider this as some sort of crisis is absolutely ridiculous.

There is a recent trend to misuse executive powers to push ideologically motivated political positions. Things need to be legislated not forced through executive powers.
Except that the pandemic just showed us that if we need to make big systematic changes, it has to come from the executive powers.
We'll hit 1.5ºC in the next few years. The big question is how big an overshoot we do and whether we can end the century below 1.5.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,932
9,358
113
Except that the pandemic just showed us that if we need to make big systematic changes, it has to come from the executive powers.
We'll hit 1.5ºC in the next few years. The big question is how big an overshoot we do and whether we can end the century below 1.5.
I think that is a bad precedent though. We might as well have a dictatorship where one guy decides what is right or wrong.

These things need to be legislated per our democratic processes.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,666
27,755
113
I think that is a bad precedent though. We might as well have a dictatorship where one guy decides what is right or wrong.

These things need to be legislated per our democratic processes.
Or even better, you could listen to the summaries of 10's of thousands of scientists and their views on possible solutions.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,932
9,358
113
Or even better, you could listen to the summaries of 10's of thousands of scientists and their views on possible solutions.
Thats different though. When you are trying to make a law, it has to go through the parliament. There are vested interests here, regardless of what the scientists say.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,932
9,358
113
What 'vested interest' do you think scientists operate under?
There are corporate organizations which often times fund studies to reach scientific conclusions that support their business goals. Those studies can be biased even though there are scientists involved. We have to remember there are billions to be earned in profits in the climate change and green energy space.

All that said, I am not disputing climate science. I agree something needs to be done. However, what I dont agree with is the urgency that is being pushed. There are more important existential issues that we should be worried about, like poverty, hunger, accessibility to medicine and so on. Climate initiatives are necessary but a distant priority.

Also worth noting that just destroying the fossil fuel industry is unwise. There are entire towns, thousands of families that depend on them for a living. Whatever is done should be done incrementally and gradually.

For many people who propose and push these drastic, urgent measures as if we are in some dire crisis, these things amount to mere ideological beliefs and nothing more.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
100,666
27,755
113
There are corporate organizations which often times fund studies to reach scientific conclusions that support their business goals. Those studies can be biased even though there are scientists involved. We have to remember there are billions to be earned in profits in the climate change and green energy space.

All that said, I am not disputing climate science. I agree something needs to be done. However, what I dont agree with is the urgency that is being pushed. There are more important existential issues that we should be worried about, like poverty, hunger, accessibility to medicine and so on. Climate initiatives are necessary but a distant priority.

Also worth noting that just destroying the fossil fuel industry is unwise. There are entire towns, thousands of families that depend on them for a living. Whatever is done should be done incrementally and gradually.

For many people who propose and push these drastic, urgent measures as if we are in some dire crisis, these things amount to mere ideological beliefs and nothing more.
If you're following the money it starts and stops with the oil and gas industry.
Not research and not renewables or carbon capture.
Its in the oil industry.

Same with the research, this research is happening in nearly 100 countries with thousands and thousands of researchers. Either you are accusing all of them of being corrupt or you have to explain why even those with 'corporate funding' come to the same results. Not to mention Exxon and Shell's own researches came out with the same numbers nearly 50 years ago.

We are now at the point where without big change in the next few years we'll overshoot 1.5ºC warming which will have massive changes.
If the planet warms above 2ºC feedback effects could kick in which could make it much worse. Worries are already in for feedback effects like methane melts, glacial melts, ocean temp/salinity levels and more extreme weather.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,286
2,651
113
Ghawar
For many people who propose and push these drastic, urgent measures as if we are in some dire crisis, these things amount to mere ideological beliefs and nothing more.
I am not aware of any drastic and urgent measures in place or to be
implemented to avert climate catastrophe. If anything it is carbon
emission growth into the future that our government is working on.

Carbon emission can continue growing until 2029 and the 40--50%
reduction target by 2030 can still be reached.

Gas-powered vehicle sales will not be banned before 2035
or 2034 In all likelihood majority of cars commuting on highways
one decade from now will be running on gas.

Carbon tax is to be rebated as far as I know.

There is no sign our export of metallurgical coal will
ever drop in the near future.

After Steven Guilbeault the climate-lunatic-turned-climate-hypocrite
announced approval of deep water drilling project would be unlikely after
Bay Du Nord Jonathan Wilkinson came in to assure the oil business
deep water projects will continue to be supported by the government
through the coming decades.

There is indeed a pretense the earth is in midst of climate emergency
on the part of our leaders and climate activists. According to world's
climate leaders the scientific consensus of the measure needed to
avert imminent global climate catastrophe seems to be something
along the line of a reduction of carbon emission on a global scale as
drastic as 50% by 2030 and to zero by 2050. If I understand the finding
of climate scientists according to our leaders correctly carbon emission
growth must be reversed before 2030 or some climate tipping point
between now and 2030 will be breached. Once emission growth
is past the tipping point climate change is to become irreversible.

The drastic and urgent measures required to reduce emission
are obvious. An incremental reduction of imports of oil from
Saudi Arabia and other gulf producers, putting a cap on oilsand
production growth in Alberta and placing a ban on deep water
drilling (starting with Bay Du Nord) would do the job of immediate
carbon emission reduction. But if you believe action speak louder
than words you should realize that all the talks about climate crisis
is just a ploy to sucker climate sheeple voters.
 

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,932
9,358
113
If you're following the money it starts and stops with the oil and gas industry.
Not research and not renewables or carbon capture.
Its in the oil industry.
This is not true. Companies like GE and Philips make billions just from LED lighting.

Same with the research, this research is happening in nearly 100 countries with thousands and thousands of researchers. Either you are accusing all of them of being corrupt or you have to explain why even those with 'corporate funding' come to the same results. Not to mention Exxon and Shell's own researches came out with the same numbers nearly 50 years ago.

We are now at the point where without big change in the next few years we'll overshoot 1.5ºC warming which will have massive changes.
If the planet warms above 2ºC feedback effects could kick in which could make it much worse. Worries are already in for feedback effects like methane melts, glacial melts, ocean temp/salinity levels and more extreme weather.
I am not disputing research. I am expressing skepticism that it may be biased.

However, I don't believe in the kind of crisis that you are highlighting, and that it needs to be handled right now, while deprioritizing far greater issues. I think the impacts of warming will not be as severe. For instance, what does "more extreme weather" mean? Are you saying that our summer temps are going to go from 30C to 50C all of a sudden? Or are you saying the lowest temps in Feb is going to be -50C overnight? Or is it going to be a degree or two here and there over a period of many years? I can live with the latter.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
18,808
4,254
113
I am not disputing research. I am expressing skepticism that it may be biased.

Good for you

Starting with a pre-determined conclusion and searching for data that only supports that conclusion is not scientific research
And the fact of the matter is research grants are only available to proposals to support the alarmists view

Arrive at a skeptical conclusion and you will see your funding cut off, publications blocked by pal review or worse
Ask Peter Rudd, Judith Curry, Wille Soon, Richard Lindzen, Will Happer or Mury Salby
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
15,286
2,651
113
Ghawar
??????

How?

?????
I should have appended 'in the mind of the fools who voted in
their climate leaders' to the sentence quoted.

By 2030 Trudeau will be living his retirement years
travelling around in a private jet. The 40--50% emission
reduction target will be flushed down the toilet by then.
 
Toronto Escorts