Garden of Eden Escorts
Toronto Escorts

Dump a load $60 or Full $80

too2shy

$ Talks Bullshit Walks
Nov 27, 2002
2,635
2
38
ottawa
this post is hilarious. lol. I remember a sp who advertised on one of those old phone dating lines. Arab chick who was well educated, and pretty much did this as a thrill. wanted gangbangs and rough sex.

Can't say I find the pics too attractive of this lady.. perhaps one of you guys who takes your camera can help her out.. please no cockshots lol
 

Jabba

Indy reviewer
May 15, 2003
1,546
199
63
Ottawa
Rough

this post is hilarious. lol. I remember a sp who advertised on one of those old phone dating lines. Arab chick who was well educated, and pretty much did this as a thrill. wanted gangbangs and rough sex.

Can't say I find the pics too attractive of this lady.. perhaps one of you guys who takes your camera can help her out.. please no cockshots lol
Sorry for the hijack...
Hey too2shy - I remember that Arab (Iranian) chick. She was great! Best fun I had in a long time. Too bad she retired. I might have to try Melanie to see if she can fill the void.
 

out4fun

Active member
Jan 8, 2008
977
42
28
Sorry for the hijack...
Hey too2shy - I remember that Arab (Iranian) chick. She was great! Best fun I had in a long time. Too bad she retired. I might have to try Melanie to see if she can fill the void.
Nathalie? She was fun.
 

thruster

New member
Jun 17, 2003
160
0
0
haven't connected yet

I gather that she likes oral, may like to be gangbanged and photo'd. I like her pix on cerb, it looks like she has an absorbing rear that jiggles when probed. Her tits look on the small side but ample enough. Has anyone gone full serv and can share a report? She's milfish or a bit too young at 33.:D
 

ekimout

New member
Nov 26, 2009
11
0
0
I'm sure she may be a great woman, but the ad does nothing for me or my member. Perhaps if she took a more, perhaps less raw approach, she would attract more clients. But hey! go for it.
 

herelookin (pt2)

New member
Jan 4, 2008
436
0
0
Am I the only one that finds that posting a bit disturbing… the fact that there are posting regarding the morality of the person in question; and the fact that it is a (fairly open) board?

Nowhere has anyone stated that anyone has been neglected; in fact the judgement is on one or two people's (limited) contact with the person.

Just seems a bit hypocritical to me; IMHO
 

MissNaomi

Banned
Nov 20, 2008
37
0
0
Ottawa
Am I the only one that finds that posting a bit disturbing… the fact that there are posting regarding the morality of the person in question; and the fact that it is a (fairly open) board?

Nowhere has anyone stated that anyone has been neglected; in fact the judgement is on one or two peoples (limited) contact with the person.

Just seems a bit hypocritical to me; IMHO
I thought it was overly hypocritical... and a discussion better left for a board of another subject.
 

o-dog

Member
Oct 11, 2008
197
5
18
Completely hypothetical question - if you had a child in a joint custody situation, and you found out the mother was posting those CL ads and working with your child in the same apartment, would you be ok with that?

The thread should be deleted for the fact that it can't be substantiated, but neglect isn't as simple as withholding food and shelter. Potentially exposing a child to adult sexuality or even possibly endangering them is just as bad, if not worse.

It's a touchy subject and bound to stir up some emotion.

Am I the only one that finds that posting a bit disturbing… the fact that there are posting regarding the morality of the person in question; and the fact that it is a (fairly open) board?

Nowhere has anyone stated that anyone has been neglected; in fact the judgement is on one or two peoples (limited) contact with the person.

Just seems a bit hypocritical to me; IMHO
 

monkot

New member
Jun 19, 2009
276
0
0
Ottawa
The thread should be deleted for the fact that it can't be substantiated, but neglect isn't as simple as withholding food and shelter. Potentially exposing a child to adult sexuality or even possibly endangering them is just as bad, if not worse.

It's a touchy subject and bound to stir up some emotion.
It was substantiated...poster on the thread says that he saw it first hand...and then the sp in question claimed that her SO takes the child out when she accepts calls...either way, totally messed up situation. Who in their right flippin' mind takes calls in a home where a child lives (and worse when the child is present in the home according to a first hand witness, who really has no axe to grind). I'm not talking about seeing a regular "boyfriend"...this is calls from ads on CL...totally fucked up and as Chris Rock says (but this is not funny at all)...that ain't right!
 

MissNaomi

Banned
Nov 20, 2008
37
0
0
Ottawa
Completely hypothetical question - if you had a child in a joint custody situation, and you found out the mother was posting those CL ads and working with your child in the same apartment, would you be ok with that?

The thread should be deleted for the fact that it can't be substantiated, but neglect isn't as simple as withholding food and shelter. Potentially exposing a child to adult sexuality or even possibly endangering them is just as bad, if not worse.

It's a touchy subject and bound to stir up some emotion.
Yup, too touchy.

It could be worse... she could be a crack whore... then she'd be exposing them to sex and drugs!
I'm not saying I agree, I just think people are really blowing this up when there are abused, unfortunate and starving children who could also use the attention during the holiday season.

I'm not really prepared to judge what others do unless it directly hurts me.
Being one who has sex for money, I'm not sure anyone would trust my morals anyways.. lol

If you do feel strongly about the welfare of children, donate to local food drives, toy drives, children's hospitals and charities.

If you want to make a difference you can. There are organizations out there who will take food, toys and money and put it to helping children in need all over the country.
 

o-dog

Member
Oct 11, 2008
197
5
18
It was substantiated...poster on the thread says that he saw it first hand...and then the sp in question claimed that her SO takes the child out when she accepts calls...either way, totally messed up situation. Who in their right flippin' mind takes calls in a home where a child lives (and worse when the child is present in the home according to a first hand witness, who really has no axe to grind). I'm not talking about seeing a regular "boyfriend"...this is calls from ads on CL...totally fucked up and as Chris Rock says (but this is not funny at all)...that ain't right!
Maybe substantiated isn't the right word...I'm thinking more about proof. A couple of internet postings agreeing to something is enough to make you believe it, but not proof.

I'm not too keen on the idea where sp's work out of a residence where children live either, even if they're not present. But it happens.
 

Jabba

Indy reviewer
May 15, 2003
1,546
199
63
Ottawa
Huh?

Yup, too touchy.

It could be worse... she could be a crack whore... then she'd be exposing them to sex and drugs!
I'm not saying I agree, I just think people are really blowing this up when there are abused, unfortunate and starving children who could also use the attention during the holiday season.

I'm not really prepared to judge what others do unless it directly hurts me.
Being one who has sex for money, I'm not sure anyone would trust my morals anyways.. lol

If you do feel strongly about the welfare of children, donate to local food drives, toy drives, children's hospitals and charities.

If you want to make a difference you can. There are organizations out there who will take food, toys and money and put it to helping children in need all over the country.
Ummm - I think the train definitely left the track here.
While I applaud your suggestion about donating to worthy causes, I think there is a huge disconnect between that and Melanie's business practices. I would NOT patronize any SP who had a minor in the same location where she conducts business. I would consider this to be child endangerment. I too don't claim the moral high ground, but this is just too much!
 

insidevoice

Drinking apple juice
Jul 3, 2008
4,400
1
38
I feel it's good that we have this discussion although if the story is true, it certainly would be terrible to be that kid, would it not? Anyway, to my point.

Now call me naive but I never knew it was taboo to have children in the same location an SP does business. I've not been to hundreds of SPs but I have been to more than a handful that do business out of their homes. Have I ever seen a child present in any of these visits? No. Have I seen indisputable evidence that a child does live there? Yes. So, maybe I'm missing the point here. I can understand that the guy would be freaked out to see a kid after he just made it with mom but what exactly did he expect? I've come across quite a few SPs that are single mothers and to be honest with you if a lady is charging $60 to dump a load I might half expect something of the sort happening.

But back to the big picture. For the community at large an incident like this could make for a good correction. Heck, I admit my wrongdoing if indeed it is such a taboo thing to visit an SP in her home if she's also a mother.

What do others think?
 

MissNaomi

Banned
Nov 20, 2008
37
0
0
Ottawa
Ummm - I think the train definitely left the track here.
While I applaud your suggestion about donating to worthy causes, I think there is a huge disconnect between that and Melanie's business practices. I would NOT patronize any SP who had a minor in the same location where she conducts business. I would consider this to be child endangerment. I too don't claim the moral high ground, but this is just too much!

Well like honestly, do people really expect her to be living and working out of separate places making 80$? LOL

Maybe it's just me, but while everyone's shouting "child endangerment" no one seems to remember that they're flaming a SP who has ridiculously low prices and advertise on cerb and CL, both of which are utterly FREE.

I don't support children being around. I don't have any, and if I did I sure as hell wouldn't be doing this...

But, if you're trolling CL ads and such looking for the cheapest lay, I bet you'll run into these problems (and others) a lot.
 

herelookin (pt2)

New member
Jan 4, 2008
436
0
0
Nowhere has anyone said that the child was in, or ever was in, danger.

I really do not think that “we” have the right to make a judgement of morality here.

We may not agree with what is being done… but we have no moral authority to judge this person. Perhaps some of our own issues cloud this fact. IMHO
 

insidevoice

Drinking apple juice
Jul 3, 2008
4,400
1
38
I don't support children being around. I don't have any, and if I did I sure as hell wouldn't be doing this...
I think this is the crux of the discussion. I quite agree that it's in nobody's best interest for this to happen. But having never walked a mile in her shoes I will not be one to judge.

Another point that kind of pokes at me is, who was it that blew the whistle? Now, the whistle blower might have thought to be working in the best interest of the community (or the child), but I don't think that it can be ignored that the whistle blower might have felt that this $60/80 SP might have been "stealing" clients away from other higher priced ladies (including the whistle blower). Anyway, I hope it was the former that led to the whistle blowing but one can't discount the other argument.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts