Dude, Where's My Civil War?

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,499
4,904
113
papasmerf said:
And the point is?
....that the US occupation force in Iraq would appear to be in violation of the Geneva convention on this point.
 

papasmerf

New member
Oct 22, 2002
26,531
0
0
42.55.65N 78.43.73W
danmand said:
....that the US occupation force in Iraq would appear to be in violation of the Geneva convention on this point.
Feel free to author a plan for this. I believe you will find that when an army refuses to wear a uniform, the battle lines cross where ever they attak.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,499
4,904
113
papasmerf said:
Feel free to author a plan for this. I believe you will find that when an army refuses to wear a uniform, the battle lines cross where ever they attak.
Is this a clever way of disputing that the US army is occupying Iraq?
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,053
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
The Calvary, and safety, is on the way.......back

danmand said:
The Geneva convention requires an occupation force to provide essential services, including safety, to the civilian population.
Maybe this is how Team 'w' intends 'to provide essential services, including safety, to the civilian population'.
Last throes of the insurgency ......indeed!....:rolleyes:
The 'big guns' are returning!

AC-130 Gunships Returning to Iraq
Fri Mar 3, 1:21 PM ET

AN AIR BASE IN IRAQ - The U.S. Air Force has begun moving heavily armed AC-130 airplanes — the lethal "flying gunships" of the Vietnam War — to a base in
Iraq as commanders search for new tools to counter the Iraqi resistance, The Associated Press has learned.


An AP reporter saw the first of the turboprop-driven aircraft after it landed at the airfield this week. Four are expected.

The Iraq-based special forces command controlling the AC-130s, the Combined Joint Special Operations Task Force, said it would have no comment on the deployment. But the plan's general outline was confirmed by other Air Force officers, speaking anonymously because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Military officials warned that disclosing the location of the aircraft's new base would violate security provisions of rules governing media access to U.S. installations.

The four-engine gunships, whose home base is Hurlburt Field in Florida, have operated over Iraq before, flying from airfields elsewhere in the region. In November 2004, air-to-ground fire from AC-130s supported the U.S. attack that took the western city of Fallujah from insurgents. Basing the planes inside Iraq will cut hours off their transit time to reach suspected targets.

The left-side ports of the AC-130s, 98-foot-long planes that can slowly circle over a target for long periods, bristle with a potent arsenal — 40 mm cannon that can fire 120 rounds per minute, and big 105 mm cannon, normally a field artillery weapon. The plane's latest version, the AC-130U, known as "Spooky," also carries Gatling gun-type 20 mm cannon.

The gunships were designed primarily for battlefield use to place saturated fire on massed troops. In Vietnam, for example, they were deployed against North Vietnamese supply convoys along the Ho Chi Minh Trail, where the Air Force claimed to have destroyed 10,000 trucks over several years.

The use of AC-130s in places like Fallujah, urban settings where insurgents may be among crowded populations of noncombatants, has been criticized by human rights groups.

The slow-moving AC-130s also offer an intelligence gathering advantage in the Iraq fight: sophisticated long-range video, infrared and radar sensors.

American commanders are marshaling all available tools to detect the Iraqi insurgents' stealthy operations, especially at night, when they plant roadside bombs targeting American road patrols and convoys.

The Air Force's senior tactical commander in Iraq said the AC-130 can be both a high-intensity and low-intensity weapon.

"It's got tons of guns, and it's got all kinds of stuff on it that can be applied to the problems you have," Brig. Gen. Frank Gorenc, who refused to discuss the current AC-130 deployment, said in an AP interview.
 
May 3, 2004
1,686
0
0
danmand said:
The Geneva convention requires an occupation force to provide essential services, including safety, to the civilian population.
Civilized society morally expects, that terrorists/insurgents not sabotage and destroy essential services infrastructure that aids society, on a daily basis for almost 3 years now.

Civilized society morally expects that terrorists/insurgents not to intentionally target and murder thosuands and thousands of innocent civilians on a daily basis for almost 3 years now.

Now only if the terrorists/insurgents would adhere to the wishes of civilized society.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,499
4,904
113
rogerstaubach said:
Now only if the terrorists/insurgents would adhere to the wishes of civilized society.
Yeah, why won't they just bend over?

The US, being a cosigner of the Geneva convention, has an obligation, as an occupation force, to provide essential services, including safety, to the civilian population. If they are unable to do so, they have another option.
 
May 3, 2004
1,686
0
0
danmand said:
Yeah, why won't they just bend over?

The US, being a cosigner of the Geneva convention, has an obligation, as an occupation force, to provide essential services, including safety, to the civilian population. If they are unable to do so, they have another option.
Yes I agree with you danmand. If only the terrorists/insurgents/criminal elements would just "bend over" to the overall will of the Iraqi people and let the Iraqi people live in safety then this whole issue of "essential services infrastructure" being destroyed daily and innocent Iraqi being targeted and murdered daily would be resolved .

Go figure.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts