S.C. Joe said:I don't agree because somebody who gets drunk everyday needs more alcohol to effect them. So them being at .2 might be the same feeling for them as the guy who hardly drinks like me at .1
We both would likely drive just as bad...I had 2 drinks last summer in the Falls and drove back to my hotel after waiting a good half hour after, I wasn't drunk but it did effect me.
I am just trying to make some suggestions for improving the laws that exist. You can find fault with any law, if that is your goal. Are you an anarchist? It seems you would prefer no laws because you can find a potential flaw in everything. For sure there will be drunk drivers until cars can drive themselves. I think my suggestions warrant consideration, even if they are not perfect, because they could potentially reduce drunk driving. I don't think the points you raise above address the questions I have brought up, nor are they valid reasons for not making changes to the law.S.C. Joe said:And with self administered breathalizers at all bars, people would try to drink right up to the limit.
This problem isn't new likein the 1980's was the first real crack down, drunk driving deaths are off the highs in the 80's but have been holding steady or slowly going up since the 90's.
Until cars can drive themselves we might have drunk drivers.

