Don’t Believe The Hype: Woke Is Real And It’s Dangerous

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
"While most scholars are reluctant to estimate a total number of "unnatural deaths" in China under Mao, evidence shows he was in some way responsible for at least 40 million deaths and perhaps 80 million or more. This includes deaths he was directly responsible for and deaths resulting from disastrous policies he refused to change."
HOW MANY DIED? NEW EVIDENCE SUGGESTS FAR HIGHER NUMBERS FOR THE VICTIMS OF MAO ZEDONG'S ERA - The Washington Post
Woke originally meant " alert to social and/or racial discrimination and injustice" . It has since been appropriated by conservatives and mostly racists to mean anything that challenges the status quo in terms of racial and social equality and opportunity. What in ther world does anything that you and your friends have been posting have to do with racial or socila justice.

Are you opposed to racial and socila justice? Yes or no.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,790
1,601
113

krealtarron

Hardened Member
Nov 12, 2021
4,937
9,357
113
Woke has just become a generally meaningless word used with multiple definitions that depend on the speaker and what they don't like.
(Look at Bethany Mandel flail to answer it on that podcast a while back.)

The original definition from 100 years ago is largely gone now.
I did not know woke had a 100 year old definition.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,790
1,601
113
That the best you can rebuke! A comic strip! That what woke ideology did to your mind! I don’t know if I should feel sorry for you.
 

Mr Deeds

Muff Diver Extraordinaire
Mar 10, 2013
6,424
3,633
113
Here
Woke in its present form has morphed into an obsessive oppressive cult.
You mean as opposed to far right fanatics and government who are Banning books and the right for women to choose whether they want to have an abortion or not yeah I think I'll stay woke
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
You mean as opposed to far right fanatics and government who are Banning books and the right for women to choose whether they want to have an abortion or not yeah I think I'll stay woke
To the maga crowd wanting to teach history base on facts and raising awareness of social injustice is oppressive but banning books and teaching certain things is protecting freedom. Iron is truly dead.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,790
1,601
113
To the maga crowd wanting to teach history base on facts and raising awareness of social injustice is oppressive but banning books and teaching certain things is protecting freedom. Iron is truly dead.

I'll never tire of watching Marxists eating their own

Ana Kasparian, of the left wing hosts of The Young Turks, was put on blast this week on Twitter for "using trans-exclusionary language" when she Tweeted out the obvious: that she was a woman.


Kasparian added. "I'm sure a lot of women don't want to be minimized to a bodily function or body part," she said in a later Tweet.


As was predicted by many in the responses, Kasparian was roasted by many "trans-allies".

"Those words are meant for AFAB [assigned female at birth] people as a category, not individual people. Get a grip," transgender journalist Katelyn Burns responded to Kasparian.

"Who called you that? I've only ever heard that used when referring to a population, not an individual person," another user wrote. "Obviously, those terms are meant to be precise to include all people who meet one of those characteristics, when needing to discuss a relevant topic."



"I respect you a lot, but this notion that the mere existence of trans-inclusive terms (rarely used in casual convos) somehow degrades women comes right out of the right's anti-trans 'war on women' playbook," added Mike Figueredo of The Humanist Report.

"I have zero problem with inclusion. None. But there’s gotta be a better way than boiling it down to a body part, no? Especially in the context of having reproductive rights taken away from people who just see woman as a baby-making vessel. That’s all I’m saying," Kasparian said in response.

"Your comment section has turned into a lunatic asylum. Some people just can't accept your remarks," Ian Miles Cheong concluded.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
I'll never tire of watching Marxists eating their own

Ana Kasparian, of the left wing hosts of The Young Turks, was put on blast this week on Twitter for "using trans-exclusionary language" when she Tweeted out the obvious: that she was a woman.


Kasparian added. "I'm sure a lot of women don't want to be minimized to a bodily function or body part," she said in a later Tweet.


As was predicted by many in the responses, Kasparian was roasted by many "trans-allies".

"Those words are meant for AFAB [assigned female at birth] people as a category, not individual people. Get a grip," transgender journalist Katelyn Burns responded to Kasparian.

"Who called you that? I've only ever heard that used when referring to a population, not an individual person," another user wrote. "Obviously, those terms are meant to be precise to include all people who meet one of those characteristics, when needing to discuss a relevant topic."



"I respect you a lot, but this notion that the mere existence of trans-inclusive terms (rarely used in casual convos) somehow degrades women comes right out of the right's anti-trans 'war on women' playbook," added Mike Figueredo of The Humanist Report.

"I have zero problem with inclusion. None. But there’s gotta be a better way than boiling it down to a body part, no? Especially in the context of having reproductive rights taken away from people who just see woman as a baby-making vessel. That’s all I’m saying," Kasparian said in response.

"Your comment section has turned into a lunatic asylum. Some people just can't accept your remarks," Ian Miles Cheong concluded.
Sounds like she turned "ultra MAGA " ROTFLMFAO!! It doesn't take much to be cancelled by the woke lefty crowd. All it takes is to acknowledge basic biology.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,790
1,601
113
Woke ideology.

I'll never tired of watching Marxists eating their own

Ana Kasparian, of the left wing hosts of The Young Turks, was put on blast this week on Twitter for "using trans-exclusionary language" when she Tweeted out the obvious: that she was a woman.


Kasparian added. "I'm sure a lot of women don't want to be minimized to a bodily function or body part," she said in a later Tweet.


As was predicted by many in the responses, Kasparian was roasted by many "trans-allies".

"Those words are meant for AFAB [assigned female at birth] people as a category, not individual people. Get a grip," transgender journalist Katelyn Burns responded to Kasparian.

"Who called you that? I've only ever heard that used when referring to a population, not an individual person," another user wrote. "Obviously, those terms are meant to be precise to include all people who meet one of those characteristics, when needing to discuss a relevant topic."



"I respect you a lot, but this notion that the mere existence of trans-inclusive terms (rarely used in casual convos) somehow degrades women comes right out of the right's anti-trans 'war on women' playbook," added Mike Figueredo of The Humanist Report.

"I have zero problem with inclusion. None. But there’s gotta be a better way than boiling it down to a body part, no? Especially in the context of having reproductive rights taken away from people who just see woman as a baby-making vessel. That’s all I’m saying," Kasparian said in response.

"Your comment section has turned into a lunatic asylum. Some people just can't accept your remarks," Ian Miles Cheong concluded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
I'll never tired of watching Marxists eating their own

Ana Kasparian, of the left wing hosts of The Young Turks, was put on blast this week on Twitter for "using trans-exclusionary language" when she Tweeted out the obvious: that she was a woman.


Kasparian added. "I'm sure a lot of women don't want to be minimized to a bodily function or body part," she said in a later Tweet.


As was predicted by many in the responses, Kasparian was roasted by many "trans-allies".

"Those words are meant for AFAB [assigned female at birth] people as a category, not individual people. Get a grip," transgender journalist Katelyn Burns responded to Kasparian.

"Who called you that? I've only ever heard that used when referring to a population, not an individual person," another user wrote. "Obviously, those terms are meant to be precise to include all people who meet one of those characteristics, when needing to discuss a relevant topic."



"I respect you a lot, but this notion that the mere existence of trans-inclusive terms (rarely used in casual convos) somehow degrades women comes right out of the right's anti-trans 'war on women' playbook," added Mike Figueredo of The Humanist Report.

"I have zero problem with inclusion. None. But there’s gotta be a better way than boiling it down to a body part, no? Especially in the context of having reproductive rights taken away from people who just see woman as a baby-making vessel. That’s all I’m saying," Kasparian said in response.

"Your comment section has turned into a lunatic asylum. Some people just can't accept your remarks," Ian Miles Cheong concluded.
For the woke crowd, the ideological purity and walking the tightrope is everything. It's Marxism at its finest, an ideology that will literally kill its own to protect itself. Kasparian is nothing to them, none of them are. The only thing that counts is the loyalty to the cause- even if that means repeating anti- science nonsense like the gender theories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,045
5,431
113
Lewiston, NY
Honestly, it’s probably enough to apply Justice Potter Stewart’sunderstanding of pornography: “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material … but I know it when I see it.”
Not good enough, dude! You have to be able to tell good quality from garbage.


Truth is not the goal of a never-ending quest to describe what is, but simply whatever they proclaim it to be. When there is no hard and fast truth, anything is possible. Facts are not stubborn things, but malleable building blocks which gain or lose authority based on their usefulness for constructing preferred narratives.
That's how they explain alternative facts, right??

Thus, the woke incessantly offer versions of events that are at odds with the known record. They told us that the summer of 2020 riots were “mostly peaceful;” that antifa was only an idea; that the nation is overrun by white supremacists and Christian nationalists. They insist that women earn a fraction of the pay men get for performing the same work; that unarmed blacks are shot by the police at much higher rates than other Americans; that all disparities between blacks and whites in wealth, health, and education are completely due to racism. And they assert that critical race theory is only taught in some law school classes, that mathematics is racist and sexist, men can menstruate, climate change is an existential threat, and Gov. DeSantis wants to prevent teachers in Florida from saying the word “gay.”
Downright tame compared to rightie propaganda, isn't it??

The crucial dynamic is not just the assertion of fraught claims but the continued advancement of them after they have been debunked. The New York Times, for example, didn’t just declare in its “1619 Project” that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery, it pooh-poohed complaints from leading historians that this was false.
As TV’s Dr. House observed, “everybody lies.” But woke lies have a larger purpose beyond gaining a temporary advantage. They are a strategy aimed at defining reality. Yes, people have always argued over truth, but history shows that societies governed by rigid, facts-be-damned ideology crush freedom, human dignity, and progress in order to coerce submission.
This soul-crushing dynamic is inevitable because people aren’t blind – they can see they are being lied to. This is the chief reason why American politics has become so angry and divisive. The woke left is trying to impose a false world view. When people push back, they are silenced, demonized, and canceled. Dissent is not an option because the entire woke project depends on acceptance of their worldview.
Woke isn’t just a word, it’s a revolution.
If it were,t for the context, you could easily think they are talking about themselves, which they are...
 

Resetset

Well-known member
Nov 12, 2022
829
648
93
I posted this in some other thread. To save yourself the click woke is marxism.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,790
1,601
113
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76
Toronto Escorts