We are socialist but how socialist we are is distorted by real estate. In the US you can pass on stocks and real estate to your next of kin without taxation, in Canada you can only do that with real estate. If we taxed both real estate and stocks or did not tax real estate and stocks upon death, capital would probably be available for more productive investments and our economy would be more competitive. Real estate still wins either way because you can depreciate the f*ck out of it to avoid taxes but as long as it is not such a huge lopsided victory for real estate then our economy would benefit and we would look less socialist.
No, not entirely correct.
"In the US you can pass on stocks and real estate to your next of kin without taxation"
No. The US has Estate taxes. This is defined as; "In the United States, the estate tax is a federal tax on the transfer of the estate of a person who dies. The tax applies
to property that is transferred by will or, if the person has no will, according to state laws of intestacy." Thus, Estate taxes apply to real estate which is considered property.
This Estate Tax is levied on an individual basis and is calculated based on a graduated tax rate system
on the value of your taxable estate (including stocks and real estate) beginning at a rate of 18% and quickly moves to a top federal tax rate of 40% on the value that exceeds US$1 million.
en.wikipedia.org
"your next of kin without taxation, in Canada you can only do that with real estate."
This is not correct. You can only do this
with your Personal Residence. Canada does not has Estate Taxes like the US but instead everything is valued as sold and you pay the corresponding taxes on this. This is on top of Probate taxes of course.
"Real estate still wins either way because you can depreciate the f*ck out of it to avoid taxes"
Not entirely true. Real Estate is defined as; Real estate is property consisting of land and the buildings on it, along with its natural resources such as growing crops (e.g. timber), minerals or water, and wild animals; immovable property of this nature; an interest vested in this (also) an item of real property, (more generally) buildings or housing in general.
HOWEVER, in Canada you cannot depreciate land (and animals I suspect).
So, if your "Real Estate" is made up of land, you cannot "depreciate the fuck out of it to avoid taxes". You're also mis-understanding what depreciation is and what it is used for. Depreciation is to spread the cost of of capital over the course of
it's working, or useful lifespan. Thus, the Capital is considered useless naturally and thus it's cost at the time of sale is minimum anyway. This has nothing to do with taxation. Depreciation also follows set rules for types of Capital so
you cannot randomly choose your depreciation schedule (as you seem to infer) to "avoid taxes". This is an accounting issue, not a taxation issue. Taxation is secondary.
Information for individuals and partners claiming capital cost allowance on the depreciable property used in their businesses and the criteria for each class.
www.canada.ca