Where is that money currently sitting? In your RRSP? TFSA? Other?I thinking about investing my retirement $ in dividend stocks. Embridge and TD. 50/50 split. Interest rates are so low you can' t. make anything. Bury it and see where we're at in ten years.
I had it in rrsp mutual funds last ten years. Its been like 3%. I think dividend alone pay better even without the stock price going up much.Where is that money currently sitting? In your RRSP? TFSA? Other?
You should diversify your risk based on where the money is sitting to offset capital gains (or potential losses).
RRSP: Growth stocks with dividends
TFSA: Solid dividend stocks
Other: Risky dividend stocks (so that you can claim capital loss)
Also, good start but try to get a basket of 10 stocks to spread your risk. I'd pick 5 industries, 2 companies per industry.
This is great advice obviously 95% of the time but this is a special circumstance.i have those two stocks in my rrsp portfolio. solid performing stocks, but i would recommend you diversify more.
mutual funds are great if you are a novice or cannot do research on the net. the management suck up all the profits. fund manager and the company get rich. a basket of good blue chip paying dividend over the long term in your own self directed account is better in the long run. 8% over the long term is a good marker. that is doubling every 7 years.I had it in rrsp mutual funds last ten years. Its been like 3%. I think dividend alone pay better even without the stock price going up much.
I own some BAM but they are into a lot of brick and mortar assets (shopping malls and office buildings). How will shopping malls and office buildings do in the future?I love Brookfield Asset Management also but it’s been finally on a tear a little bit and not buying that for dividend yield but for growth.
The market is forward-looking. So, the right question is not how they will do in the future, but how they will do in the future RELATIVE TO what people think today about how they will do in the future.I own some BAM but they are into a lot of brick and mortar assets (shopping malls and office buildings). How will shopping malls and office buildings do in the future?
So, it is about 12% annually compounded over 22 years. Sounds about right. However, saving their 2.5% MER and going with low-fee growth funds would have netted extra $60K today. Of course, there were no ETFs 20 years ago...Between 96-2000 I was in a pension plan at work with Investors. My contribution every month was 4 hundred. The guy invested me in 6 different funds. One was FID265. Anyway, I got out of the plan when I left the Company and got rid of everything except 265, I bought stocks and other investments with balance. Anyway, I do not know how much I actually contributed to 265, most like no more than 10K. Anyway, I am sure glad I kept it as it is now worth 122K and has out performed my other investments. 2.25 mer, but worth it the fund pays well. Annual divided payment in Dec, last one was over 6K, I am looking forward to this years.
Fidelity Canadian Growth Company Fund Series B (CADFUNDS: FID265.CF) Quote
Updated NAV Pricing for Fidelity Canadian Growth Company Fund Series B (CADFUNDS: FID265.CF). Charting, Tear Sheets, Fund Holdings & more.www.theglobeandmail.com
I guess my point is this. If you look at the last 10 years on the chart attached. If you invested 10k in FID265 it would be worth 50k today. If you invested in the index or the category it would only be worth around 20k. So I am happy to pay 2.25% mer to make this much profit. I know the index or etf funds are usually between .5 and 1% but I am very happy with the results. I have bank stock and other etfs that have performed to the index and while ok they have not outperformed. I invested in all these funds because of the low mers. Now I am beginning to wonder. I always invest in dividend stocks as that is the way to grow for the long term.So, it is about 12% annually compounded over 22 years. Sounds about right. However, saving their 2.5% MER and going with low-fee growth funds would have netted extra $60K today. Of course, there were no ETFs 20 years ago...
Thanks fall. Did I read the chart wrong? It says it grew to 50k not 40K as you suggest. Are you suggesting it was not a good investment? You are right on etf mers for index. I was thinking of other etfs like XIU. Thanks for the correction.Well, FID265 grew from $10K to $40K in 10 years while Canadian market grew only to $20K. However, S&P 500 denominated in CAD grew to $50K and, by the definition of "Canadian Growth" fund, FID265 has only 50% Canadian equity in it. Since it is growth company fund, its beta is above 1, so, yes, you are getting your expected return minus MER. By the way, MER for market-index ETFs is below 0.1%, not between 0.5% and 1%






