Asterix said:
You're asking me to explain the rationale of another nutbar?
No I'm not, and I don't consider you a nutbar.
I'm asking you to consider looking at things in a different light and to re-examine the "facts" concerning Oswald's character.
Asterix said:
So an organized conspiracy that relied on one loose cannon to carry out the assassination now relies on an emotional unstable man to stumble into the police underground parking and take him out? I'm sorry that's stretching it beyond what I can accept. Oswald was in custody being interogatted for two days. If there had been a conspiracy he never would have made it that far or been taken alive in the first place. Again the risk would have been too great.
I don't believe the two were as emotionally unstable as they've been portrayed. The case against Oswald was building within minutes of the assassination and he had to get caught in order to perpetuate the lone gunman story. Think about it, Oswald was not willing to get caught yet within 2 hours he was arrested. It was some pretty spectacular police work to find and catch a perpetrator who was unwilling to get caught in a city the size of Dallas.
I'm sorry, the whole thing stinks. When it was convenient to portray the "lone gunman" theory, officials had things lined up perfectly yet simple things like an autopsy were botched.
The autopsy on the victim of the crime of the century wasn't even performed by a coroner!
I doubt we will change each other's mind. On this matter I will consider you one who reached his conclusions based on misinformation, false allogations and invalid character assessments. Feel free to consider me another conspiracy theory nutcase.