Steeles Royal

Diddy arrested in a Manhattan hotel.

Ceiling Cat

Well-known member
Feb 25, 2009
28,652
1,401
113
I'm thinking of filing my own lawsuit.
Your honour, back in 2005 when Diddy attended Caribana he rubbed his erect penis against me in a Tim Horton's as we passed each other in the doorway.
I am still traumatized and suing for $20 million, but I'll settle for $10 million 😃
 
  • Haha
Reactions: jimidean2011

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,788
4,880
113
Keep in mind that I don’t know for a fact what occurred at the Diddy parties, and neither does any other poster, unless he/she was actually there
Thats what the thousands of hours of video tape evidence will determine once its shown in court. Video tapes dont lie

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Baby oil laced with GHB

 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
2,514
2,385
113
Ok I read the details behind this one and I have to say of all of the lawsuits so far this one sounds the most fabricated. It sounds like a scene from a really bad B movie, down to the woman getting a knife and holding it on diddy but deciding to spare him and run away. The whole thing just sounds....fugaze 🤷‍♂️
 

Toronto Passions

Trusted Since 2001!
Supporting Member
Ok I read the details behind this one and I have to say of all of the lawsuits so far this one sounds the most fabricated. It sounds like a scene from a really bad B movie, down to the woman getting a knife and holding it on diddy but deciding to spare him and run away. The whole thing just sounds....fugaze 🤷‍♂️
I just finished reading the article. It doesn’t sound real.

With the way charges have been mounting up, and with the way different accusers have been stepping forward, it’s very similar to Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby. Almost like once the floodgates open people feel courage to step up. However, this situation does seem like it’s a lie.

Philip
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
2,514
2,385
113
I just finished reading the article. It doesn’t sound real.

With the way charges have been mounting up, and with the way different accusers have been stepping forward, it’s very similar to Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby. Almost like once the floodgates open people feel courage to step up. However, this situation does seem like it’s a lie.

Philip
Ya in a situation like this there are sure to be a few scammers making an attempt at receiving compensation but cmon, at least make it sound plausible and realistic. That story sounded like total nonsense. Do better scammers :ROFLMAO:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Toronto Passions

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,788
4,880
113
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,788
4,880
113
This is getting juicy, folks. The New York Post claims to have seen hours long video of Diddy's freak off parties. Many A-listers were caught on tape, although that doesn't automatically mean they were guilty of any crimes

 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Patron

Well-known member
Jan 5, 2014
516
453
63
This is getting juicy, folks. The New York Post claims to have seen hours long video of Diddy's freak off parties. Many A-listers were caught on tape, although that doesn't automatically mean they were guilty of any crimes

From the article:

“These are consistent with the videos we have,” a federal law enforcement source who is involved in the investigation said after hearing descriptions of the scenes in the videos that The Post viewed.
“Just about everything you can imagine was happening at his parties. Now our job is to determine whether this was consensual for everyone involved, if anyone has been trafficked, and what laws have been broken.”
In the videos viewed by The Post, the identities of most of the participants are unknown, but the feds believe that at least some of the victims in videos they obtained were coerced to perform.”

This is what concerns me. Who in their right mind would throw a party if he/she has deep pockets, including and perhaps especially, when a company is involved?

Have a thousand people over and some of them have sex, and it is a federal crime if any of them have regrets later. Hell, that happens all the time, especially if Money Damages occur if they decide they have regrets. If it happens, it might also be a federal crime if any of them crossed state lines or is underaged.

I know many would argue that Diddy damn well knew, and in fact made money by singing about the things he did, but the precedent that is getting set in these situation is troubling to me.

Of course, this has been the case with alcohol for years. Let someone drive drunk after a party, and the company or party organizer can be held partially liable.

The U.S. has gradually become more tame as a result of actions like these. I guess that is the goal of federal law enforcement here.

If one watched the tape, I suspect everyone involved appeared to be an active and happy participant in the orgy.
 

jimidean2011

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2011
2,514
2,385
113
This is getting juicy, folks. The New York Post claims to have seen hours long video of Diddy's freak off parties. Many A-listers were caught on tape, although that doesn't automatically mean they were guilty of any crimes

I've been starting to think that this is going to play out the same way as the Epstein case. Everything is going to get buried to protect the powerful people involved and we will be left speculating. It's been a few weeks since these tapes have surfaced and the fact that nothing has leaked leads me to believe that celebs are buying the tapes and destroying them to protect themselves.
 

onomatopoeia

Bzzzzz.......Doink
Jul 3, 2020
21,275
17,354
113
Cabbagetown
I've been starting to think that this is going to play out the same way as the Epstein case. Everything is going to get buried to protect the powerful people involved and we will be left speculating. It's been a few weeks since these tapes have surfaced and the fact that nothing has leaked leads me to believe that celebs are buying the tapes and destroying them to protect themselves.
They can't buy the copies possessed by the FBI. I think sleazy news outlets like The Daily Mail and The New York Post will name names after the video evidence is presented in court.

From Phil C McNasty's link in post #415:

“These are consistent with the videos we have,” a federal law enforcement source who is involved in the investigation said after hearing descriptions of the scenes in the videos that The Post viewed.

It's rare that an FBI insider would confirm something printed by The New York Post.

It's really difficult to suppress digital video when multiple people already have copies, and any one of them can generate and distribute an unlimited number of identical copies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,788
4,880
113
They can't buy the copies possessed by the FBI. I think sleazy news outlets like The Daily Mail and The New York Post will name names after the video evidence is presented in court.

From Phil C McNasty's link in post #415:

“These are consistent with the videos we have,” a federal law enforcement source who is involved in the investigation said after hearing descriptions of the scenes in the videos that The Post viewed.

It's rare that an FBI insider would confirm something printed by The New York Post.

It's really difficult to suppress digital video when multiple people already have copies, and any one of them can generate and distribute an unlimited number of identical copies.
But there's a catch 22, if the person on the video is underage it automatically becomes child porn.
So whomever is holding that tape could be in big trouble if they sell it, or even possess it
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

onomatopoeia

Bzzzzz.......Doink
Jul 3, 2020
21,275
17,354
113
Cabbagetown
But there's a catch 22, if the person on the video is underage it automatically becomes child porn.
So whomever is holding that tape could be in big trouble if they sell it, or even possess it
Distribution of copies to the general public for the purpose of generating revenue could cause big trouble for someone in possession of the material. Private distribution to individuals with no direct nor indirect connection to Diddy would be very difficult, if not impossible to trace.

I possess a lot of digital video. None of it is illegal to own. Some of it cannot be overtly shared with the general public, because copyright holders would have it removed from an upload location. I could, however, misname the material with titles that would not appeal to anyone who was curious, and I might store the material in a location which isn't connected to the Internet. No one would find it unless they knew what to look for, and where. The point of this is that the powerful people who appear in the videos cannot possibly make every copy disappear to save their reputations. Even if they could find and delete all copies in private hands, they have no chance of suppressing the copies possessed by the FBI and other Federal authorities. You can't use money to bribe the people who print money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimidean2011

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
39,823
7,306
113
Charged with RICO crimes, you don't have many options. Puffy will die in jail.

Hollywood takes its time but it always takes out the garbage.

 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts