There were good people on both sides.Oh. That was the reason the US carpet bombed them. Same time period lynching was a sport in the American South.
Okay.... Now defend Pol Pot.Thank you Donald.
john c mginley , was just as good, if not better than berenger and defoe. IMHO.Just finished this doc and thought I'd post it for the few mongers out here in TERB-Land who have more than one dimension to their personalities. Maybe some will find it as fascinating as I did.
This doc is amazing. Awe inspiring the bond and the comradery between the actors who made this academy award winning movie that blew my 20 year old self away when it was released. I left that theatre in the dead of winter in Hamilton back in the day shaken to the core. Watching this documentary, it really takes you for a walk through your memories. Incredible the bonds that were formed with these young actors. And great to see Charlie Sheen not being a douche for the first time in decades. Who knew there was still a human being under there.
Oh, and Tom Berringer was robbed for the Best Supporting Actor
The problem with most 60's era WWII films were fairy tales, the Germans were meat puppets to be hacked and mangled in Sir Robin's mercy. Quentin Tarantino followed this formula with his revenge fantasy Inglorius Basterds. The best war films from that era are still Bridge on the River Kwai, The Great Escape and in a lesser light The Battle of the Bulge - mainly due to the formidable presence of Robert Shaw.BS You ignore Kelly's Heroes...
John C. McGinley always brings it. And there is no doubt that this role and how well he executed it, catapulted his career. I remember seeing an interview with him years ago talking about taking the Platoon role. He had to leave a successful role on Broadway and then the film was delayed so he was doing nothing for almost a year.john c mginley , was just as good, if not better than berenger and defoe. IMHO.
Pol Pot owed his power to Henry Kissinger and US foreign policy.Okay.... Now defend Pol Pot.
He was part of the same furball. US bombed him as well.
Just because the US commits war atrocities against your country doesn't make you a nice regime.
Pol Pot was a hardline commie. So you got a helluva argument to make here.Pol Pot owed his power to Henry Kissinger and US foreign policy.
Pol Pot was a hardline commie. So you got a helluva argument to make here.
But fucking around aside, the US were dickheads in the first degree by escalating further and further in an attempt to win an unwinnable war and yes, this included asinine horseshit like bombing the fuck out of Hanoi. And a bunch of other stupid shit.
But the communist regimes in SE Asia weren't exactly poster kids for "nice". They were repressive regimes that were extremely brutal in their own right. Their selling point was that they gave land and participation in government to Viet peasants who - up to that time - had been disempowered, oppressed pawns of the landlord class.
There are no squeaky clean "nice guys" here.
The US promised to help the Vietnamese kick out the French colonialists. When they didn't, Ho Chi Minh sought help from the communists. The US fucked up everything over there. As they fuck up everything everywhere. Their invasion of Iraq spawned isis. I could go on and on. But I won't.
I don't think the States promised Ho that they would help kick out the French. France was an ally and Viet Nam was French territory. The US had no clout there.The US promised to help the Vietnamese kick out the French colonialists. When they didn't, Ho Chi Minh sought help from the communists. The US fucked up everything over there. As they fuck up everything everywhere. Their invasion of Iraq spawned isis. I could go on and on. But I won't.