Denmark’s Bestiality Problem: It’s Legal

[Aardvark154]

I thought income from prostitution was taxable in Canada. I am sorry.

Remember what happened to Al Capone. (Other than a trial which today would probably have been overturned on appeal, and dying of syphilis.)

 

[GameBoy27]

which begs the question: how would one know if an animal enjoyed human sex?

The same could be said for many Asian girls. lol

Am I reading this right?
Is this to say that it's illegal to pay to have sex with another human being, but it's perfectly above board to have sex with an animal there?
I can't wait to book a trip.

I fixed your post.

Denmark, where men are men and sheep are nervous.

There's a reason for that saying.

 

[widescreen]

Denmark, where men are men and sheep are nervous.

That reminds of something I read when traveling through Wales many years ago;

The correct definition of a Leisure Center in Wales:

"4 Sheep tied to a Lamp Post"

 

[GPIDEAL]

Really ? We have laws against beastiality and we don't have animal brothels.
No, prostitutes don't pay taxes on prostitution. Get with it.

Prostitutes are supposed to claim their income just like any other taxpayer. Prostitution was never illegal per se, and under C-36, since they will be immune for prosecution from receiving the material benefits of prostitution, I doubt this means that CRA will make their livelihoods tax free. How many claim their receipts from escorting is another matter all together.

 

[IM469]

Denmark already has a handful of animal brothels which, according to Ice News, a site specialized in Nordic reporting, charge between $85 and $170 depending on the animal of choice.

Danish news sources have quoted a recent Gallup poll, which found that just 76 percent of the Danish population support the new law, which implies that 24 percent of the population would like freedom of movement when it comes to pursuing beasts for pleasure.

These two items stuck out of the article (other than surprise that there are enough people attracted to animals sexually that there is a market). I have a morbid type curiosity in exactly why one animal would be $85 and the other $170. I'm assuming these guys are just looking for an wet hole with a heartbeat to stick their dicks into - I wonder what the difference is.

Suggesting that because 76 % support the law it means 24% love animal sex is a classic example of flawed logic. Maybe a lot of them didn't feel like talking to a polling twit about animal sex or maybe they would feel better that these guys are in an animal bordello instead of stalking pets in their own backyard.

 

[GameBoy27]

These two items stuck out of the article (other than surprise that there are enough people attracted to animals sexually that there is a market). I have a morbid type curiosity in exactly why one animal would be $85 and the other $170. I'm assuming these guys are just looking for an wet hole with a heartbeat to stick their dicks into - I wonder what the difference is.

Suggesting that because 76 % support the law it means 24% love animal sex is a classic example of flawed logic. Maybe a lot of them didn't feel like talking to a polling twit about animal sex or maybe they would feel better that these guys are in an animal bordello instead of stalking pets in their own backyard.

GFE vs. PSE perhaps?

 

[danmand]

GFE vs. PSE perhaps?

Dog vs. Bobcat?